@article {GORNET557, author = {MATTHEW F. GORNET and GLENN R. BUTTERMANN and RICHARD WOHNS and JASON BILLINGHURST and DARRELL C. BRETT and RICHARD KUBE and J. RAFE SALES and NICHOLAS J. WILLS and ROSS SHERBAN and FRANCINE W. SCHRANCK and ANNE G. COPAY}, title = {Safety and Efficiency of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Ambulatory Surgery Centers vs. Hospital Settings}, volume = {12}, number = {5}, pages = {557--564}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.14444/5068}, publisher = {International Journal of Spine Surgery}, abstract = {Background: Outpatient surgery has been shown safe and effective for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and more recently, for 1-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). The purpose of this analysis is to compare the safety and efficiency of 1-level and 2-level CDA performed in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and in a hospital setting.Methods: The study was a retrospective collection and analysis of data from consecutive CDA patients treated in ASCs compared to a historical control group of patients treated in hospital settings who were classified as outpatient (0 or 1-night stay) or inpatient (2 or more nights). Surgery time, blood loss, return to work, adverse events (AEs), and subsequent surgeries were compared.Results: The sample consisted of 145 ASC patients, 348 hospital outpatients, and 65 hospital inpatients. A greater proportion of 2-level surgeries were performed in hospital than ASC. Surgery times were significantly shorter in ASCs than outpatient or inpatient 1-level (63.6 {\textpm} 21.6, 86.5 {\textpm} 35.8, and 116.7 {\textpm} 48.4 minutes, respectively) and 2-level (92.4 {\textpm} 37.3, 126.7 {\textpm} 43.8, and 140.3 {\textpm} 54.5 minutes, respectively) surgeries. Estimated blood loss was also significantly less in ASC than outpatient and inpatient 1-level (18.5 {\textpm} 30.6, 43.7 {\textpm} 35.9, and 85.7 {\textpm} 98.0 mL, respectively) and 2-level (21.1 {\textpm} 12.3, 67.8 {\textpm} 94.9, and 64.9 {\textpm} 66.1 mL). There were no hospital admissions and no subsequent surgeries among ASC patients. ASC patients had 1 AE (0.7\%) and hospital patients had 10 AEs (2.4\%). Working patients returned to work after a similar number of days off, but fewer ASC patients had returned to work by the end of the 90-day period.Conclusions: Both 1- and 2-level CDA may be performed safely in an ASC. Surgeries in ASCs are of shorter duration and performed with less blood loss without increased AEs.}, issn = {2211-4599}, URL = {https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/12/5/557}, eprint = {https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/12/5/557.full.pdf}, journal = {International Journal of Spine Surgery} }