Skip to main content
Log in

Chronic pain—the end of the welfare state?

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of low back pain has reached epidemic proportions in the industrialized nations. The predicament of back pain is common, 30–40% of our populations from 10–65 years old report such trouble to occur on a monthly basis. In 1–8% this results in work-disabling back pain. Only in very few of these patients can physicians diagnose a definite pathoanatomical cause for the pain. It can be deduced that psychosocial factors, including insurance benefits are of importance for this variation. Sweden, with 100% sickness benefits, has the highest disability rate.

Few non-surgical methods have proven effective in rendering the patient better for him to return to work. Even fewer studies demonstrate any benefit from surgery, simple open removal of a proven disc hernia being the only exception. For patients with unproven diagnostic labels such as facet arthritis, degenerative disc disease, internal disc resorption and instability, no evidence exists that any type of surgery is cost-effective.

More attention must be paid to illness behaviour by anyone treating chronic low back pain syndromes (> 3 months). Such psychological reactions to an originally nociceptive pain stimulus somewhere in the motion segment, must be elucidated and addressed, before embarking on risky and expensive treatment modalities including surgery.

It is time for all of us, politicians as well as physicians, to distinguish what types of support will contribute to our nations' future and which ones will undermine it. Our welfare systems are at stake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nachemson A. Onti Ryggen, orsaker, diagnostik och behandling. SBU 1991. (In Swedish).

  2. Osignerad. Repetitive strain injury/occupational overuse syndrome. A statement by the Royal Australian College of Physicians, December 1988.

  3. Dimberg L. Symptoms from the Neck, Shoulders and Arms in an Industrial Population and Some Related Problems. Thesis, 1991 University of Göteborg.

  4. Hadler NM. Arm pain in the workplace. J Occup Med 1992; Feb: 113–119.

  5. The next welfare state. Instead of tinkering, Britain's government needs to rethink the case for public spending. Economist 1993; May 29: 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Branegan J. Sweden. Model No More. Once proud Sweden endures a shattering recession and faces an uncertain future. Time 1993; July 19: 18–19.

  7. Östgaard HC, Andersson GBJ. Previous back pain and risk of developing back pain in a future pregnancy. Spine 1991; 16: 132–436.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frymoyer JW. Predicting disability from low back pain. Clin Orthop 1992; 79: 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Waddell G, Bryn-Jones M. Trends in British sickness and invalidity benefit for back incapacities: 1953–54 to 1990–91. Br Med J (in press).

  10. Nachemson A. Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look. Clin Orthop 1992; 279: 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frymoyre JW, Nachemson A. Natural history of low back disorders. In: Frymoyer JW (ed.) The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice New York: Raven Press, 1991: 1537–1550.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nachemson A, Spengler MD, Bigos S et al. Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. I. Overview and cost analysis. Spine 1986; 11: 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Troup JDG, Martin JW, Lloyd DCEF. Back pain in industry: A prospective study. Spine 1981; 6: 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nachemson A. Lumbar mechanics as revealed by lumbar intradiscal pressure measurements. In: Jayson MIV (ed.) The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain, 4th edn Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1992: 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kelsey JL, Githens PB, O'Conner T. Acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. An epidemiologic study with special reference to driving automobiles and cigarette smoking. Spine 1984; 9: 608–613.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindell V, Hansson T: Arbetsbelastning på ortopedisk vådavdelning. Antalet lyft är inte det avgörande. Läkartidningen 1990; 87: 2237–2239. (In Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lundberg U, Granqvist M, Hansson T et al. Psychological and physiological stress responses during repetitive work at an assembly line. Work Stress 1989; 3: 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Magnusson M, Granqvist M, Jonsson R et al. The loads on the lumbar spine during work at an assembly line. The risks for fatigue injuries of the vertebral bodies. Spine 1990; 15: 774–779.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newton M, Waddell G. Trunk strength testing with iso-machines. Part 1: review of a decade of scientific evidence. Spine 1993; 18: 801–811.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bergenudd H, Nilsson B. Back pain in middle age; occupational workload and psychologic factors: an epidemiologic survey. Spine 1988; 13: 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holmström EB, Lindell L, Moritz U. Low back and neck/shoulder pain in construction workers: occupational workload and psychosocial risk factors. Part 2: relationship to neck and shoulder pain. Spine 1992; 17: 673–677.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vällfors B. Acute, subacute and chronic low back pain. Clinical symptoms, abseenteism and working environment. Scand J Rehab Med 1985; (Suppl): 11.

  23. Bigos SJ, Battié MC, Spengler DM et al. A longitudinal, prospective study of industrial back injury reporting. Clin Orthop 1992; 279: 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Leino P. Physical Loading and Mental Stress as Determinal Musculoskeletal Disorders. Thesis University of Tampere, Finland 1989.

  25. Åstrand NE. Prediction of Sick Leave, Early Retirement, Unemployment, Labour Turnover and Mortality in a Swedish Male Working Population. A Prospective Study. Thesis, Malmö 1988.

  26. Hirsch C, Nachemson A. Clinical observations on the spine in ejected pilots. Acta Orthop Scand 1961; 31: 136–145.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sandstedt P, Rutberg P. Skador efter raketstolsutskjutningar i svenska flygvapnet 1967–1987. Läkartidningen 1989; 86: 1159–1161. (In Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Allan DB, Waddell G. An historical perspective on low back pain and disability. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: (Suppl. 234) 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fordyce W, McMahon R, Rainwater G et al. Pain complaint-exercise performance. Relationship in chronic pain. Pain 1981; 10: 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robertson LS, Keeve JP. Worker injuries: The effects of workers compensation and OSHA inspections. J Health Polit Policy Law 1983; 8: 581–597.

    Google Scholar 

  31. WCRI research brief: benefit increases and system utilization. The Connecticut experience. Cambridge, MA: Workers Compensation Research Institute, 1991; 7: 12

  32. Fefer MD. What to do about Workers' Comp. Fortune 1992; June 29: 80–82.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Greenough CG, Fraser RD. The effects of compensation on recovery from low-back injury. Spine 1989; 14: 947–955.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Greenwood J, Taricco A. Workers' Compensation Health Care Cost Containment. USA: LRP Publications, 1992: 1–228.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Guest GH, Drummond PD. Clinical section. Effect of compensation on emotional state and disability in chronic back pain. Pain 1992; 48: 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Osterweis M, Kleinman A, Mechanic D. Pain and disability. Clinical, Behavioral, and Public Policy Perspectives. Washington; National Academy Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bell DS. ‘Repetition strain injury’: an iatrogenic epidemic of simulated injury. Med J Aust 1989; 151: 280–284.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Californian jobs. Mexico, ho. 1993; The Economist July 17: 48.

  39. Holm S. Nutrition of the Intervertebral Disc. Transport and Metabolism. Thesis, University of Göteborg, Sweden, 1980.

  40. Bortz WM. The disuse syndrome. West J Med 1984; 141: 691–694.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nachemson A, Spitzer WO et al. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine 1987; Suppl. 7S: S1–S59.

  42. Chöler U, Larsson R, Nachemson A, Peterson L-E. Ont i ryggen-Försök med vådprogram för patienter med lumbala smärttillstaød. Spri rapport 1985; 188. (In Swedish)

  43. Fordyce WE, Brockway JA, Bergman JA. Acute back pain: A control-group comparison of behavioral vs traditional management methods. J Behav Med 1985; 9: 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shekelle P. Spinal manipulation for low back pain. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 590.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wood DJ. Design and evaluation of a back injury prevention program within a geriatric hospital. Spine 1987; 12: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lindström I, Öhlund C, Eek C et al. Mobility, strength and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain. Spine 1992; 17: 641–652.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lindström I, Öhlund C, Nachemson A. Industrial physical work demands inpatients with subacute low back pain. Validity of patient reporting and predictive value of industrial physical work demands. Submitted to Spine.

  48. Revel M, Payan C, Vallee C et al. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy versus chemonucleolysis in the treatment of sciatica. A randomized multicenter trial. Spine 1993; 18: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Floor H et al. Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers, a meta analytic review. Pain 1992; 49: 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bush T, Waddell G. An international comparison of back surgery rates. (Submitted to Spine)

  51. Taylor VM, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Kreuter W. Low Back Pain Hospitalization: Recent US Trends and Regional Variations. (Submitted to Spine).

  52. Nachemson A. Low back pain. Are orthopaedic surgeons missing the boat? Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Waddell G, Somerville D, Henderson I, Newton M. Objective clinical evaluation of physical impairment in chronic low back pain. Spine 1992; 17: 617–628.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Waddell G. Biopsychosocial analysis of low back pain. Clin Rheumatol 1992; 6: 523–557.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Waddell G. Understanding the patient with backache. In: Jayson MIV (ed.) The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1992; 469–485.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Keefe FJ, Block AR. Development of an observation method for assessing pain behavior in chronic low back pain patients. Behav Ther 1982; 13: 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Linton SJ, Kamwendo K. Risk factors in the psychosocial work environment for neck and shoulder pain in secretaries. J Occup Med 1989; 31.

  58. Mechanic D, Angel RJ. Some factors associated with the report and evaluation of back pain. J Health Soc Behav 1987; 28: 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nachemson, A. Chronic pain—the end of the welfare state?. Qual Life Res 3 (Suppl 1), S11–S17 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433370

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433370

Key words

Navigation