Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis using the ideal pedicle entry point during the freehand technique

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previously, we described the ideal pedicle entry point (IPEP) for the thoracic spine at the base of the superior facet at the junction of the lateral one third and medial two thirds with the freehand technique on cadavers. Here we measured the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement (Chung et al. Int Orthop 2008) on post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans in 43 scoliosis patients who underwent operation with the freehand technique taking the same entry point. Of the 854 inserted screws, 268 (31.3%) were displaced; 88 (10.3%) and 180 (21.0%) screws were displaced medially and laterally, respectively. With regard to the safe zone, 795 screws were within the safe zone representing an accuracy rate of 93%; 448 and 406 thoracic screws inserted in adolescent idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis showed an accuracy of 89.9 and 94%, respectively (p = 0.6475). The accuracy rate of screws inserted in the upper, middle and lower thoracic pedicles were 94.2, 91.6 and 93.7%, respectively (p = 0.2411). The results indicate that IPEP should be considered by surgeons during thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation.

Résumé

Le point d’entrée idéal des vis pediculaires (IPEP) au niveau thoracique se situe au niveau de la facette articulaire supérieure à la jonction du tiers latéral, 2/3 médial. Nous avons mesuré l’efficacité de cette technique « à main levée » par des scanners post-opératoires sur 43 scolioses chez 43 patients opérés. 268 (31,3%) des 854 vis mises en place n’étaient pas à un niveau parfait. 88 (10,3%) et 180 (21,0%) étaient soit trop médianes soit trop latérales. Néanmoins, si l’on considère la zone de sécurité, 795 vis soit 93% étaient en zone de sécurité. 448 et 446 vis thoraciques insérées lors d’une scoliose idiopathique ou neuromusculaire de l’adolescent étaient en zone saine dans respectivement 89,9% et 94% (p = 0,6475). Le taux de précision des vis insérées à la partie supérieure ou médiane ou inférieure du pédicule thoracique était respectivement de 94,2%, 91,6% et 93,7% (p = 0,2411). Résultats : cette étude montre que la technique de mise en place des vis pediculaires à « main levée » peut être considérée comme une technique efficace au niveau thoracique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belmont PJ, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, Polly DW (2001) In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine 26(21):2340–2346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boucher HH (1959) A method of spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 41:248–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Broom MJ, Banta JV, Renshaw TS (1989) Spinal fusion augmented by luque-rod segmental instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:32–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown CA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Geideman WM, Hasan SA, Blanke K (1998) Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws. Spine 23(14):1566–1571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cinotti G, Gumina S, Ripani M et al (1999) Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. Spine 24:654–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung KJ, Suh SW, Desai S, Song HR (2007) Ideal entry point for the thoracic pedicle screw during the free hand technique. Int Orthop Apr 17 (Epub ahead of print)

  7. Dvorak M, MacDonald S, Gurr KR, Bailey SI, Haddad RG (1993) An anatomic, radiographic, and biomechanical assessment of extrapedicular screw fixation in the thoracic spine. Spine 18:1689–1694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebraheim NA, Jabaly G, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1997) Anatomic relations of the thoracic pedicle to adjacent neural structures. Spine 22:1553–1557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V (1993) Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine 18:2231–2239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Faraj AA, Webb JK (1997) Early complications of spinal pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 6:324–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrick MR, Kowalki JM, Simmons ED (1997) Reliability of roentgenogram evaluation of pedicle screw position. Spine 22(11):1249–1252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher CG, Sahajpal V, Keynan O, Boyd M, Graeb D, Baily C, Panagiotopoulos K, Dvorak MF (2006) Accuracy and safety of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic spine trauma. J Neurosurg Spine 5:520–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fu TS, Wong CB, Tsai TT, Liang YC, Chen LH, Chen WJ (2007) Pedicle screw insertion: computed tomography versus fluoroscopic image guidance. Int Orthop Apr 5 (Epub ahead of print)

  14. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE (1990) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in vivo. Spine 15:11–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Sandhu HS, Alvarez L (1999) The placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computerised stereotactic guidance. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(5):825–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD (2004) Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 29(3):333–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuntz C 4th, Maher PC, Levine NB, Kurokawa R (2004) Prospective evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement using fluoroscopic imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:206–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marty Z, Michael B, Christian K, Joachim L, Christian K, Leonard B (2004) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine fractures. Part II: a retrospective analysis of 278 pedicle screws using computed tomographic scans. Eur J Trauma 30:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds AF, Roberts PA, Pollay M, Stratemeier PH (1985) Quantitative anatomy of the thoracolumbar epidural space. Neurosurgery 17(6):905–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sapkas GS, Papadakis SA, Stathakopoulos DP et al (1999) Evaluation of pedicle screw position in thoracic and lumbar spine fixation using plain radiographs and computed tomography. A prospective study of 35 patients. Spine 24:1926–1929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schhwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Jost B, Visarius H, Arm E, Langlotz F, Nolte L, Ozdoba C (1997) Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement: an in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine 22(4):452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ, Cho KH, Oh JH (1994) Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 18:341–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim W, Chung Y, Park Y (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1399–1405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomic and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200–1206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zeiller SC, Lee J, Lim M, Vaccaro AR (2005) Posterior thoracic segmental pedicle screw instrumentation: evolving methods of safe and effective placement. Neurol India 53(4):458–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Woo Suh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Modi, H., Suh, S.W., Song, HR. et al. Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis using the ideal pedicle entry point during the freehand technique. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 469–475 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0535-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0535-x

Keywords

Navigation