Skip to main content
Log in

Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987–1999

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite being recognised for many years as a clinical diagnosis, no exact definition of spinal stenosis has yet been agreed, leading to difficulties in interpreting and comparing studies of the incidence, prevalence and treatment. This study presents the first analysis of national data to be reported. It is a retrospective population-based national register study, aimed at analyzing surgical interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, patient characteristics, subsequent development, and case fatality rate, based on Swedish national data for 1987–1999. Complete follow-up data were obtained of incidence and type of spinal stenosis surgery, rate of multiple operations, mortality, underlying causes of death, length of hospital stay, and case fatality rate by linkage of the National Inpatient Register and Swedish Death Register. The study cohort consisted of 10,494 patients. Laminectomy was performed in 89%, and additional fusion in 11%. The mean annual rate of operations was 9.7 per 100,000 inhabitants, the annual number of operations performed increased from 4.7 to 13.2 per 100,000 inhabitants per year. The case fatality rate within 30 days after surgery was 3.5 per 1000 operations. Cardiovascular disease was the most common cause of death (46%). Relative risk of dying within 30 days of admission was doubled in men, and for fusion surgery, and increased four fold in patients older than 80 years. The relative risk of dying decreased during the study period. The results show that spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden has increased, and is associated with a low risk. Within an ageing group of patients, mortality has declined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine 20:1178–1186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F, et al (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25:1424–1435

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atlas S, Deyo R, Keller R, et al (1996) The Maine Lumbar Spine Study. III. One-year outcomes of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:1787–1794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berney J (1994) Epidemiology of narrow spinal canal. Neurochirurgie 40:174–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boden S (1996) The use of radiographic imaging studies in the evaluation of patients who have degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:114–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolender N, Schönström N, Spengler D (1985) Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:240–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciol M, Deyo R, Howell E, Kreif S (1996) An assesment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:285–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deyo R, Cherkin D, Loeser J, Bigos S, Ciol M (1992) Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:536–543

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T (1993) Long-term results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 18:1471–1474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hopp E, Tsou P (1983) Postdecompression lumbar instability. Clin Orthop 179:86–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnsson K (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. A retrospective study of 163 cases in southern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 66:403–405

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnsson K, Uden A, Rosen I (1991) The effect of decompression on the natural course of spinal stenosis. A comparison of surgically treated and untreated patients. Spine 16:615–619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katz J, Lipson S, Larson M, McInnes J, Fossel A, Liang M (1991) The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:809–816

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kent D, Haynor D, Larson E, et al (1992) Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults. A meta analysis of the accuracy of CT, MR and myelography. Am J Roentgenol 158:1135–1144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martinelli T, Wiesel S (1992) Epidemiology of spinal stenosis. Instr Course Lect 179–181

  16. Nilasena D, Vaughn R, Mori M, Lyon J (1995) Surgical trends in the treatment of diseases of the lumbar spine in Utah's Medicare population, 1984 to 1990. Med Care 33:585–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oldridge N, Yuan Z, Stoll J, Rimm A (1994) Lumbar spine surgery and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries, 1986. Am J Public Health 84:1292–1298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parvizi J, Johnson B, Rowland C, Ereth M, Lewallen D (2001) Thirty-day mortality after elective total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1524–1528

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rothman K (1998) Introduction to categorical statistics. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S (eds) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

  20. SAS Institute (1997) SAS/STAT (R) software: changes and enhancements through release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, pp 247–348

  21. Schönström NS, Bolender NF, Spengler DM (1985) The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine 10:806–811

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Simotas A, Dorey F, Hansraj K, Cammisa Jr F, Katz J (2000) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 25:197–203; http://ipsapp002.lwwonline.com/content/getfile/160/65/1/fulltext.htm - R29-10401

    Google Scholar 

  23. Statistics (1998) Health, diseases, causes of death 1996. The National Board of Health and Welfare, Centre for Epidemiology, Stockholm

  24. Statistics Sweden (1997) Statistical yearbook of Sweden 1997. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm

  25. Statistics Sweden (2000) Statistical yearbook of Sweden 2000. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm

  26. Strömqvist B, Jönsson B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Larsson B, Lind B (2001) The Swedish National Register for Lumbar Spine Surgery, Swedish Society for Spinal Surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 72:99–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Anders Ekbom for inspiring discussions on the study design.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K-Å. Jansson.

Additional information

K-Å. Jansson was partly funded by the Karolinska Institute and the Karolinska Hospital

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jansson, KÅ., Blomqvist, P., Granath, F. et al. Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987–1999. Eur Spine J 12, 535–541 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0544-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0544-9

Keywords

Navigation