Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common finding in MRI scans and X-rays. However, their correlation to morphological and biochemical changes is not well established. In this study, radiological and MRI parameters of DDD were assessed and compared with morphological and biochemical findings of disc degeneration. Thirty-nine human lumbar discs (L1–S1), age 19–86 years, were harvested from eight cadavers. Within 48 h postmortem, MRIs in various spin-echo sequences and biplanar radiographs of intact spines were obtained. Individual discs with endplates were then sectioned in the mid-sagittal plane and graded according to the morphological appearance. Samples from the nucleus of each disc were harvested for biochemical analysis including water and proteoglycan contents. On MRIs, T2-signal intensity, Modic changes, disc extension beyond the interspace (DEBIT), nucleus pulposus shape, annular tears, osteophytes and endplate integrity were graded. On radiographs, an independent observer classified the parameters disc height, endplate sclerosis, osteophytes, Schmorl’s nodes, intradiscal calcifications and endplate shape. General linear-regression models were used for statistical analysis. Backward elimination with a 10% significance cut-off level was used to identify the most significant parameters, which then were summed to create composite scores for radiography, MRI and the combination of both methods. The grading was performed by three observers, and a reliability analysis using Cronbach’s alpha model was used to control interobserver agreement. The three radiographic parameters height-loss, osteophytes and intradiscal calcifications correlated significantly with the morphological degree of degeneration (p<0.001, R2=642). Significant differences of even one morphological grade could also be differentiated in the composite radiological score (p<0.05), except at the extremes between grades 1 and 2 and grades 4 and 5. All MRI parameters correlated significantly with the morphological grade (p<0.05); however Modic changes, T2-intensity and osteophytes accounted for 83% of the variation in the data. T2-signal intensity correlated significantly with H2O and proteoglycan content (p<0.001), and was best for detecting highly degenerated discs. Regression showed that the combined score was better correlated with the morphological grade (p<0.001, R2=775) than either the composite radiographic (p<0.001, R2=642) or composite MRI (p<0.001, R2=696) alone. Based on the combined score, a backwards elimination of the regression was performed, in which the parameters Modic changes, and T2-intensity loss (MRI) as well as calcifications (X-ray) accounted for 87% of the variability. The interobserver validation showed a high correlation for all three scores (Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.95 to 0.97). Conclusion: selective imaging parameters and a newly created scoring scheme were found to correlate with disc degeneration as determined in a morphological manner. Surprisingly, radiographic parameters were able to distinguish different stages of degeneration, whereas MRI could only detect advanced stages of disc degeneration. We conclude that X-rays may remain a cost-effective, non-invasive in vivo-grading method to detect early disc degeneration, and, combined with MRI, correlate best with morphological and biochemical assessment of disc degeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1 a
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson GB (1998) Epidemiology of low back pain. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 281:28–31

  2. Antoniou J, Steffen T, Nelson F, Winterbottom N, Hollander AP, Poole RA, Aebi M, Alini M (1996) The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. J Clin Invest 98:996–1003

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antoniou J, Pike GB, Steffen T, Baramki H, Poole AR, Aebi M, Alini M (1998) Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of degenerative disc disease. Magn Reson Med 40:900–907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benneker LM, Anderson S, Heini P, Alini M, Ito K (2002) Vertebral endplate marrow contact channel occlusions: a mechanism for intervertebral disc degeneration? ISSLS (unpublished data)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:403–408

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Braithwaite I, White J, Saifuddin A, Renton P, Taylor BA (1998) Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI: correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography. Eur Spine J 7:363–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckwalter J, Martin J (1996) Intervertebral disk degeneration and back pain. In: Weinstein JN (ed) Low back pain: A scientific and clinical overview. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL, pp 607–623

  8. Crock HV (1982) Traitement chirurgical de la calcification du nucleus pulposus du disque intervertebral dorsal et lombaire, chez l’adulte. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:171–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fahey V, Opeskin K, Silberstein M, Anderson R, Briggs C (1998) The pathogenesis of Schmorl’s nodes in relation to acute trauma. An autopsy study. Spine 23:2272–2275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Farndale RW, Buttle DJ, Barrett AJ (1986) Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim Biophys Acta 883:173–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Biggemann M (1997) Objektive Messung der Höhe lumbaler Bandscheiben aus seitlichen Röntgen-Übersichtsaufnahmen. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 135:395–402

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frymoyer JW, Newberg A, Pope MH, Wilder DG, Clements J, MacPherson B (1984) Spine radiographs in patients with low-back pain. An epidemiological study in men. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1048–1055

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamanishi C, Kawabata T, Yosii T, Tanaka S (1994) Schmorl’s nodes on magnetic resonance imaging. Their incidence and clinical relevance. Spine 19:450–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hilton RC, Ball J, Benn RT (1976) Vertebral end-plate lesions (Schmorl’s nodes) in the dorsolumbar spine. Ann Rheum Dis 35:127–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain [see comments]. N Engl J Med 331:69–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen MC, Kelly AP, Brant-Zawadzki MN (1994) MRI of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Q 10:173–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Katz ME, Teitelbaum SL, Gilula LA, Resnick D, Katz SJ (1988) Radiologic and pathologic patterns of end-plate-based vertebral sclerosis. Invest Radiol 23:447–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamer TJ (1999) Lumbar spine pain originating from vertebral osteophytes. Reg Anesth Pain Med 24:347–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Lamminen A, Viikari-Juntura E (1999) Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 25:487–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. MacNab I (1971) The traction spur. An indicator of segmental instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:663–670

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Malmivaara A, Videman T, Kuosma E, Troup JD (1987) Plain radiographic, discographic, and direct observations of Schmorl’s nodes in the thoracolumbar junctional region of the cadaveric spine. Spine 12:453–457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Modic MT, Ross JS (1991) Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 22:283–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR (1988) Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 166:193–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Neill TW, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA, Bhalla AK, Reeve J, Reid DM, Todd C, Woolf AD, Silman AJ (1999) The distribution, determinants, and clinical correlates of vertebral osteophytosis: a population based survey. J Rheumatol 26:842–848

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Osti OL, Fraser RD (1992) MRI and discography of annular tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. A prospective clinical comparison [see comments]. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:431–435 [published erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992 Sep; 74(5):793]

  26. Paajanen H, Erkintalo M, Kuusela T, Dahlstrom S, Kormano M (1989) Magnetic resonance study of disc degeneration in young low-back pain patients. Spine 14:982–985

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Paajanen H, Erkintalo M, Parkkola R (1997) Age-dependent correlation of low-back pain and lumbar disc degeneration. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:106–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Panagiotacopulos ND, Pope MH, Krag MH, Block R (1987) Water content in human intervertebral discs. Part I. Measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 12:912–917

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peterson CK, Bolton JE, Wood AR (2000) A cross-sectional study correlating lumbar spine degeneration with disability and pain. Spine 25:218–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pfirrmann CW, Resnick D (2001) Schmorl nodes of the thoracic and lumbar spine: radiographic-pathologic study of prevalence, characterization, and correlation with degenerative changes of 1,650 spinal levels in 100 cadavers. Radiology 219:368–374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26:1873–1878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Praemer A, Furner S, Rice D (1992) Musculoskeletal conditions in the United States. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Park Ridge, IL, USA

  33. Resnick D (1985) Degenerative diseases of the vertebral column. Radiology 156:3-14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts S, Menage J, Urban JP (1989) Biochemical and structural properties of the cartilage end-plate and its relation to the intervertebral disc. Spine 14:166–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roberts S, Menage J, Eisenstein SM (1993) The cartilage end-plate and intervertebral disc in scoliosis: calcification and other sequelae. J Orthop Res 11:747–757

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Roberts S, Urban JP, Evans H, Eisenstein SM (1996) Transport properties of the human cartilage endplate in relation to its composition and calcification. Spine 21:415–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Roberts S, McCall IW, Menage J, Haddaway MJ, Eisenstein SM (1997) Does the thickness of the vertebral subchondral bone reflect the composition of the intervertebral disc? European Spine Journal 6:385–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Salminen JJ, Erkintalo MO, Pentti J (1999) Recurrent low back pain and early disc degeneration in the young. Spine 24:1316–1321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Savage RA, Whitehouse GH, Roberts N (1997) The relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males. Eur Spine J 6:106–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sobel DF, Zyroff J, Thorne RP (1987) Diskogenic vertebral sclerosis: MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:855–858

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tertti M, Paajanen H, Laato M, Aho H, Komu M, Kormanc M (1991) Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines. Spine 16:629–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, Adams ME, Tsang IK, Bishop PB (1990) Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15:411–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Viikari-Juntura E, Raininko R, Videman T, Porkka L (1989) Evaluation of cervical disc degeneration with ultralow field MRI and discography. An experimental study on cadavers. Spine 14:616–619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yu SW, Sether LA, Ho PS, Wagner M, Haughton VM (1988) Tears of the annulus fibrosus: correlation between MR and pathologic findings in cadavers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9:367–370

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by a grant from the AO Foundation, Switzerland. The authors wish to thank the University of Basel and McGill University, Montreal, for providing spine specimens, K. Zwygart for conducting the MRI scans; and D. Pfluger for statistical assistance

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul F. Heini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benneker, L.M., Heini, P.F., Anderson, S.E. et al. Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 14, 27–35 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0759-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0759-4

Keywords

Navigation