Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gender differences as an influence on patients’ satisfaction rates in spinal surgery of elderly patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an increased rate of lumbar spinal operations in elderly patients due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Many factors affect the decision of the patient and surgeon to perform the operation, among which are the age of the patient, comorbidities and willingness to undergo surgery. However, the gender of the patient is rarely taken into consideration as a factor for performing the operation. The satisfaction of the patient is an important factor to assess the operative success retrospectively. Therefore, we assessed the differences caused by gender on the satisfaction of elderly patients following lumbar spinal surgery. Three hundred and sixty-seven elderly patients (>65 years) treated in our institution from 1990 to 2000 for lumbar spinal stenosis and who underwent laminectomy without fusion filled in a questionnaire prior to operation regarding their gender, demographic status, comorbidities, activities of daily living (ADL) using the Barthel index, and pain according to visual analogue scale. At follow-up, a telephone interview on 298 patients was structured and included the same pre-operative questions and additional questions regarding the satisfaction rate from surgery.Two hundred and ninety-eight patients responded to our telephone interview with a minimum follow-up of 1 year (mean: 64 months). After surgery, both women and men showed improvement in their ADL, and reduction in pain perception. The number of very satisfied patients was similar in both groups, but women were significantly more dissatisfied with the operation. The surgical parameters, including complications, did not differ between the groups. Gender differences were found to influence the satisfaction rate of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. Women tend to have less satisfactory results than men. The reasons for that are probably multifactorial and are not related to the surgery per se.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Airaksinen O, Herno A, Turunen V, Saari T, Suomlainen O (1997) Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 22:2278–2282

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. An HS, Vaccaro A, Simeone FA, Balderston RA, O’Neill D (1990) Herniated lumbar disc in patients over the age of fifty. J Spinal Disord 3:143–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Fidelman Z, Gepstein R (2004) Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients. Eur Spine J 13:32–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brattberg G, Parker MG, Thorslund M (1997) A longitudinal study of pain: reported pain from middle age to old age. Clin J Pain 13:144–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bush FM, Harkins SW, Harrington WG, Price DD (1993) Analysis of gender effects on pain perception and symptom presentation in temporomandibular joint pain. Pain 53:73–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cicero TJ, Nock B, Meyer ER (1997) Sex-related difference in morphine’s antinociceptive activity: relationship to serum and brain concentration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282:939–944

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coulthard P, Rood JP (1993) Anxiety during induced experimental pain. Anesth Pain Control Dent 2:150–153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fillingim RB, Maixner W, Kincaid S, Silva S (1998) Sex differences in temporal summation but not sensory-discriminative processing of thermal pain. Pain 75:121–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fredman B, Arinzon Z, Zohar E, Shabat S, Jedeikin R, Fidelman ZG, Gepstein R (2002) Observation of the safety and efficacy of surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in geriatric patients. Eur Spine J 11:571–574

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedmann JM, Elasy T, Jensen GL (2001) The relationship between body mass index and self-reported functional limitation among older adults: a gender difference. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:398–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gepstein R, Shabat S, Arinzon ZH, Berner Y, Catz A, Folman Y (2004) Does obesity affect the results of lumbar decompressive spinal surgery in the elderly? Clin Orthop 426:138–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gunzburg R, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Vandeputte K, Spratt KF (2003) Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 12:197–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guralnik MJ, Fried LP, Simonsick EM (1995) The Women’s Health and Aging Study: health and social characteristics of older women with disability. National Institute on Aging, NIH publication 95-4009, Bethesda, Md.

  14. Herno A (1995) Surgical results of lumbar spinal stenosis. Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl 210:1–969

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T, Smovalainen O (1996) Pre- and postoperative factors associated with return to work following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Am J Ind Med 30:473–478

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli E, Liang MH, Karlson EW, Cleary PD (1994) Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthr Rheum 37(5):687–694

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lavsky-Shulan M, Wallace RB, Kohout FJ, Lemke JH, Morris MC, Smith IM (1985) Prevalence and functional correlates of low back pain in the elderly: the Iowa 65+ rural health study. J Am Geriatr Soc 3:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mahoney F, Barthel D (1965) Functional evaluation: Barthel index. Maryland State Med J 14:61–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McCullen GM, Bernini PM, Bernstein SH, Tosteson TD (1994) Clinical and rentgenographic results of decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 7:380–387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mickey RM, Greenland S (1989) The impact on confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 129:125–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mobily PR, Herr KA, Clark MK (1994) An epidemiological analysis of pain in the elderly: the Iowa 65+ study. J Aging Health 6:139–154

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mogil JS, Sternberg WF, Kest B, Pechnick RN, Liebeskind J (1993) Sex differences in the antagonism of swim stress-induced analgesia: effects of gonadectomy and estrogen replacement. Pain 53:17–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shabat S, Leitner Y, Nyska M, Berner Y, Fredman B, Gepstein R (2002) Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients aged 65 years and older. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 35:143–152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spratt KF, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Vandeputte K, Gunzburg R (2004) A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 13:14–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Walker JS, Carmody JJ (1998) Experimental pain in healthy human subject: gender difference in nociception and in response to ibuprofen. Anesth Analg 86:1257–1262

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Whiffen JR, Neuwirth MG (1996) Spinal stenosis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL et al. (eds) Textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor I. Rosenfeld from Dallas, Tex., USA for his statistical assistance and guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spinal Care Unit, Sapir Medical Center, 48 Tchernichovsky Street, Kfar-Saba, 44 281, Israel

    Shay Shabat, Zeev Arinzon & Reuven Gepstein

  2. Sackler Medical School, Tel-Aviv, Kfar-Saba, 48 Tchernichovsky Street, 44 281, Israel

    Shay Shabat, Shay Shabat, Zeev Arinzon & Reuven Gepstein

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hillel-Yaffe Hospital, Israel

    Yoram Folman

  4. Department of Geriatric Rehabilitation, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel

    Abraham Adunsky

  5. Department of Spinal Rehabilitation, Loewenstein Hospital, Raanana, Israel

    Amiram Catz

Authors
  1. Shay Shabat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoram Folman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zeev Arinzon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abraham Adunsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amiram Catz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Reuven Gepstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shay Shabat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shabat, S., Folman, Y., Arinzon, Z. et al. Gender differences as an influence on patients’ satisfaction rates in spinal surgery of elderly patients. Eur Spine J 14, 1027–1032 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0808-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0808-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation