Abstract
During the past 30 years various treatment protocols for hangman’s fractures have been attempted. In order to guide the management of hangman’s fractures, different classifications have been introduced. However, opinions on operative or nonoperative treatment have not yet been solidified. To evaluate both conservative and operative management of hangman’s fractures in the published literature and to provide appropriate guidelines for treatment of hangman’s fractures, a systematic review of the literature regarding the management of hangman’s fractures was performed. An English literature search from January 1966 to January 2004 was completed with reference to treatment of hangman’s fractures. The classification for treatment guidance from the literature was also reviewed. Regarding a primary therapy for hangman’s fractures, there were 20 papers (62.5%) that advocated for a conservative treatment and 11 of the remaining 12 papers suggested that conservative treatment was suitable for some stable fractures. The classification of Effendi et al. modified by Levine and Edwards was used widely. Most hangman’s fractures could be managed successfully with traction and external immobilization, especially in Effendi Type I, Type II and Levine-Edwards Type II fractures. It is necessary for Levine-Edwards Type IIa and III fractures to be treated with rigid immobilization. Only for some stable Type I and Levine-Edwards Type II injuries, nonrigid external fixation alone was sufficient. Rigid immobilization alone was necessary for most cases. Surgical stabilization is recommended in unstable cases when there is the possibility of later instability, such as Levine-Edwards Type IIa and III fractures with significant dislocation. The classification system proposed by Effendi et al. and modified by Levine and Edwards provided a clinically reasonable guideline for successful management of hangman’s fractures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barros TE, Bohlman HH, Capen DA, Cotler J, Dons K, Biering-Sorensen F, Marchesi DG, Zigler JE (1999) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: analysis of management. Spinal Cord 37:166–171
Borne GM, Bedou GL, Pinaudeau M (1984) Treatment of pedicular fractures of the axis: a clinical study and screw fixation technique. J Neurosurg 60:88–93
Brashear R Jr, Venters G, Preston ET (1975) Fractures of the neural arch of the axis: a report of twenty-nine cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:879–887
Bucholz RD, Cheung KC (1989) Halo vest versus spinal fusion for cervical injury: evidence from an outcome study. J Neurosurg 70:884–892
Choi WG, Vishteh AG, Baskin JJ, Marciano FF, Dickman CA (1997) Completely dislocated hangman’s fracture with a locked C2-3 facet: case report. J Neurosurg 87:757–760
Coric D, Wilson JA, Kelly DL Jr (1996) Treatment of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis with nonrigid immobilization: a review of 64 cases. J Neurosurg 85:550–554
Cornish BL (1968) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 50:31–43
Cosan TE, Tel E, Arslantas A, Vural M, Guner AI (2001) Indications of Philadelphia collar in the treatment of upper cervical injuries. Eur J Emerg Med 8:33–37
Daniels CE, Montori VM, Dupras DM (2002) Effect of publication bias on retrieval bias. Acad Med 77:266
Dussault RG, Effendi B, Roy D, Cornish B, Laurin CA (1983) Locked facets with fracture of the neural arch of the axis. Spine 8:365–367
Effendi B, Roy D, Cornish B, Dussault RG, Laurin CA (1981) Fractures of the ring of the axis: a classification based on the analysis of 131 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63:319–327
Francis WR, Fielding JW (1978) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Orthop Clin North Am 9:1011–1027
Francis WR, Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ, Pepin J, Hensinger R (1981) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63:313–318
Govender S, Charles RW (1987) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Injury 18:333–335
Greene KA, Dickman CA, Marciano FF, Drabier JB, Hadley MN, Sonntag VKH (1997) Acute axis fractures: analysis of management and outcome in 340 consecutive cases. Spine 22:1843–1852
Hadley MN, Browner C, Sonntag VK (1985) Axis fractures: a comprehensive review of management and treatment in 107 cases. Neurosurgery 17:281–290
Hadley MN, Dickman CA, Browner CM, Sonntag VK (1989) Acute axis fractures: a review of 229 cases. J Neurosurg 71:642–647
Johner R, Wruhs O (1983) Classification of tibial shaft fractures and correlation with results after rigid internal fixation. Clin Orthop 178:7–25
Levine AM (1998) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: hangman’s fracture. In: Clark CR, Ducker TB, Dvorak J, Garfin SF, Herkowitz HN, Levine AM, Pizzutillo PD, Ullrich CG, Zeidman SM (eds) The cervical spine. 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 429–448
Levine AM, Edwards CC (1985) The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:217–226
Levine AM, Rhyne AL (1991) Traumatic spondilolisthesis of the axis. Semin Spine Surg 3:47–60
Marton E, Billeci D, Carteri A (2000) Therapeutic indications in upper cervical spine instability: considerations on 58 cases. J Neurosurg Sci 44:192–202
Montori VM, Swiontkowski MF, Cook DJ (2003) Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Orthop 413:43–54
Moon MS, Moon JL, Moon YW, Sun DH, Choi WT (2001–2002) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: 42 cases. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 60:61–66
Muller EJ, Wick M, Muhr G (2000) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: treatment rationale based on the stability of the different fracture types. Eur Spine J 9:123–128
Norrell H, Wilson CB (1970) Early anterior fusion for injuries of the cervical portion of the spine. JAMA 19; 214: 525–530
Pepin JW, Hawkins RJ (1981) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: hangman’s fracture. Clin Orthop 157:133–138
Rockswold GL, Bergman TA, Ford SE (1990) Halo immobilization and surgical fusion: relative indications and effectiveness in the treatment of 140 cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 30:893–898
Roda JM, Castro A, Blazquez MG (1984) Hangman’s fracture with complete dislocation of C-2 on C-3: case report. J Neurosurg 60:633–635
Samaha C, Lazennec JY, Laporte C, Saillant G (2000) Hangman’s fracture: the relationship between asymmetry and instability. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1046–1052
Schneider RC, Livingston KE, Cave AJ, Hamilton G (1965) “Hangman’s fracture” of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg 22:141–154
Seljeskog EL, Chou SN (1976) Spectrum of the hangman’s fracture. J Neurosurg 45:3–8
Sherk HH, Howard T (1983) Clinical and pathologic correlations in traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Clin Orthop 174:122–126
Starr JK, Eismont FJ (1993) Atypical hangman’s fractures. Spine 18:1954–1957
Takahashi T, Tominaga T, Ezura M, Sato K, Yoshimoto T (2002) Intraoperative angiography to prevent vertebral artery injury during reduction of a dislocated hangman fracture: case report. J Neurosurg 97(Spine 3):355–358
Taller S, Suchomel P, Lukas R, Beran J (2000) CT-guided internal fixation of a hangman’s fracture. Eur Spine J 9:393–397
Tan ES, Balachandran N (1992) Hangman’s fracture in Singapore (1975–1988). Paraplegia 30:160–164
Termansen NB (1974) Hangman’s fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 5:529–539
Tuite GF, Papadopoulos SM, Sonntag VK (1992) Caspar plate fixation for the treatment of complex hangman’s fractures. Neurosurgery 30:761–765
Vaccaro AR, Madigan L, Bauerle WB, Blescia A, Cotler JM (2002) Early halo immobilization of displaced traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Spine 27:2229–2233
Verheggen R, Jansen J (1998) Hangman’s fracture: arguments in favor of surgical therapy for type II and III according to Edwards and Levine. Surg Neurol 49:253–262
Vieweg U, Schultheiss R (2001) A review of halo vest treatment of upper cervical spine injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:50–55
White AA, Panjabi MM (1978) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Lippincott, Philadelphia
Williams TG (1975) Hangman’s fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 57:82–88
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, XF., Dai, LY., Lu, H. et al. A systematic review of the management of hangman’s fractures. Eur Spine J 15, 257–269 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0918-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0918-2