Abstract
A retrospective clinical–radiological study to evaluate the long-term outcome after artificial disc replacement was performed. The objective is to investigate long-term results after implantation of a modular type artificial disc prosthesis in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD). Total disc replacement (TDR) is a surgical procedure intended to save segmental spinal function, and thus replace spondylodesis. Short-term results are promising, whereas long-term results are scarce. The Charité TDR is the oldest existing implant, therefore, the longest possible follow-up is presented here. Seventy-one patients were treated with 84 Charité TDRs types I–III. Indication for TDR was moderate to severe DDD. Fifty-three patients (63 TDRs) were available for long-term follow-up of 17 years. Evaluation included Oswestry disability index, visual analog scale, overall outcome score, plain and extension/flexion radiographs. Implantation of Charité TDR resulted in a 60% rate of spontaneous ankylosis after 17 years. No significant difference between the three types of prostheses was found concerning clinical outcome. Reoperation was necessary in 11% of patients. Although no adjacent segment degeneration was observed in the functional implants (17%), these patients were significantly less satisfied than those with spontaneous ankylosis. TDR, nowadays, is an approved procedure. Proof that long-term results of TDR implantation in DDD are at least as good as fusion results is still missing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams MA, Freeman BJC, Morrison HP, Nels IW, Dolan P (2000) Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 25(13):1625–1636
Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S (1995) Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord 8(6):464–473
Bertagnoli R, Kumar S (2002) Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S131–S136
Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer R, Hochschuler S, McAfee P, Garcia R, Salib R, Yuan H, Lee C, Bertagnoli R, Bryan V, Winter R (2002) Artificial intervertebral discs and beyond: a North American Spine Society Annual Meeting symposium. Spine J 2(6):460–463
Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH (2003) Prospective study evaluating total disc replacement: preliminary results. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(5):450–454
Boden SD, Wiesel SW (1990) Lumbosacral segmental motion in normal individuals. Have we been measuring instability properly? Spine 15(6):571–576
Buettner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H, Conrad P (1988) [Experience and results with the SB-Charité lumbar intervertebral endoprosthesis]. Z Klin Med 43:1785–1789
Buettner-Janz K, Hahn S, Schikora K, Link HD (2002) [Basic principles of successful implantation of the SB Charite model LINK intervertebral disk endoprosthesis]. Orthopäde 31(5):441–453
Butler D, Trafimow JH, Andersson GB, et al (1990) Discs degenerate before facets. Spine 15:111–113
Chapman CR, Casey KL, Dubner R, Foley KM, Gracely RH, Reading AE (1985) Pain measurement: an overview. Pain 22:1–31
Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21(8):995–1000
David T (1993) Lumbar disc prosthesis. Surgical technique, indications and clinical results in 22 patients with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Spine J 1:254–259
Delamarter RB, David M, Kanim A, Linda E, Bae H (2003) ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 28(Suppl 20):S167–S175
Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, Gilbertson LG, Wilder DG (2001) Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 26(6):E122–E129
Dunlop R, Adams MA, Hutton WC (1984) Disc space narrowing and the lumbar facet joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:706–710
Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (1999) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop 28:336–340
Enker P, Steffee A, Mcmillin C, Keppler L, Biscup R, Miller S (1993) Artificial disc replacement. Preliminary report with a 3-year minimum follow-up. Spine 18(8):1061–1070
Etebar S, Cahill DW (1999) Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fication with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 90:163–169
Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies J, O’Brien J (1980) The oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 8:271
Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K, LeMaire JP, Zeegers WS (1994) A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine 19(16):1842–1849
Hochschuler SH, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Blumenthal SL (2002) Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S106–S110
Hopf C, Heeckt H, Beske C (2002) [Disc replacement with the SB Charite endoposthesis—experience, preliminary results and comments after 35 prospectively performed operations]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 140(5):485–491
Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Lucke M, Schröder R, Mittlmeier T (2001) Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines. An anatomic, radiographic bone mineral density, and biomechanical study. Spine 26(9):1028–1037
Kumar MN, Jacquot F, Hall H (2001) Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 10:309–313
de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WC (2003) Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 12(2):108–116
Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13:375–377
Lee CK, Parsons JR, Langrana LA, Zimmermann MC (1992) Relative efficacy of the artificial disc versus spinal fusion. In: Weinstein JN (ed) Clinical efficacy and outcome in the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Raven Press, New York, pp 237–244
Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, et al (1987) Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine 12:97–104
Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Templier A, Mendes F, Diop A, Sauty V, Laloux E (1997) Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop 337:64–76 (Review)
Link HD (2002) History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S98–S105
Manzini CU, Spina V, Mascia MT, Magistro R, Carpenito G, Ferri C (2004) [Diffuse post-traumatic calcification of the anterior longitudinal ligamentum of cervical and dorsal spine]. Reumatismo 56(2):114–117
Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A, Qose I (2002) Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S124–S130
McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J (2003) Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):384–389
McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, Shucosky EM, Cunningham BW (2003) SB Charite disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):424–433
Meyerding HW (1956) Spondylolisthesis; surgical fusion of lumbosacral portion of spinal column and interarticular facets; use of autogenous bone grafts for relief of disabling backache. J Int Coll Surg 26:566–591
Miyamoto S, Kuratsu S, Yonenobu K, Ono K (1992) Evaluation of cell proliferating potentials in ossification of the spinal ligaments by argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) staining. In: Kurokawa T (ed) Annual report of the investigation committee for ossification of the spinal ligaments under the auspices of Japanese ministry of health and welfare. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Tokyo, Japan, pp 160–165
Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B (1958) Cervical disc lesions. JAMA 166:23–28
Oegema TR Jr, Bradford DS (1991) The interrelationship of facet joint osteoarthritis and degenerative disc disease. Br J Rheumatol 30:16–20
van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):369–383
Pope MH, Wilder DG, Matteri RE, Frymoyer JW (1977) Experimental measurements of vertebral motion under load. Orthop Clin North Am 8(1):155–167
Rahm MD, Hall MD (1996) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: A retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 9(5):392–400
Ray CD (1992) The artificial disc. In: Weinstein JN (ed) Clinical efficacy and outcome in the diagnosis of low back pain. Raven Press, New York, pp271–278
Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, et al. (1994) The relative contributions of the disc and zygapophyseal joint in chronic low back pain. Spine 19:801–806
Steffee AD (1992) The Steffee artificial disc. In: Weinstein JN (ed) Clinical efficacy and outcome in the diagnosis of low back pain. Raven Press, New York, pp 245–257
Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Marnay T (2003) Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):362–368
Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, Verhaegen MJ (1999) Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8(3):210–217
Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, Sachs BL, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD (2003) Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):352–361
Zippel H (1991) “Charité modular”: conception, experience and results. In: Weinstein JN, Mayer HM, Weigel K (eds) The artificial disc. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 69–78
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Putzier, M., Funk, J.F., Schneider, S.V. et al. Charité total disc replacement—clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15, 183–195 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1022-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1022-3