Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical concepts for disc regeneration

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different strategies exist to treat intervertebral disc degeneration. Biological attempts to regenerate the disc are promising. However, degeneration of the disc is always accompanied by alterations of disc height, intradiscal pressure, load distribution, and motion patterns, respectively. Since those preconditions are independent factors for disc degeneration, it is unlikely that regeneration may occur without firstly restoring the physiological status of the affected spinal segment. In vitro and in vivo animal studies demonstrate that disc distraction normalizes intradiscal height and pressure. Furthermore, histological and radiological examinations provided some evidence for regenerative processes in the disc. Only dynamic stabilization systems currently offer the potential of a mechanical approach to intervertebral disc regeneration. Dynamic stabilization systems either using pedicle screws or with an interspinous device, demonstrate restabilization of spinal segments and reduction of intradiscal pressure. Clinical reports of patients with degenerative disc disease who underwent dynamic stabilization are promising. However, there is no evidence that those implants will lead to disc regeneration. Future treatment concepts should combine intradiscal cell based therapy together with dynamic restoration of the affected spinal segment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) Stress distributions inside intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 78–B:965–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ala-Kokko L (2002) Genetic risk factors for lumbar disc disease. Ann Med 34:42–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Battie MC, Videman T, Parent E (2004) Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine 29:2679–2690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H, Weiler C, Spratt KF, Nerlich AG (2002) Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science. Spine 27:2631–2644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brechbuhler D, Markwalder TM, Braun M (1998) Surgical results after soft system stabilization of the lumbar spine in degenerative disc disease—long-term results. Acta Neurochir 140:521–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brinckmann P, Grootenboer H (1991) Change of disc height radial, disc bulge, and intradiscal pressure from discectomy. An in vitro investigation on human lumbar discs. Spine 1:641–646

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cakir B, Ulmar B, Koepp H, Huch K, Puhl W, Richter M (2003) Posterior dynamic stabilization as an alternative for dorso-ventral fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative instability. Z Orthop 141:418–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Callaghan JP, McGill SM (2001) Intervertebral disc herniation: studies on a porcine model exposed to highly repetitive flexion/extension motion with compressive force. Clin Biomech 16:28–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cew A, McKinlay KJ, Freeman BJC, Shepperd J, McNally DS (2004) In vitro biomechanical effects of Dynesys. Poster at the EuroSpine 2004, Portugal

  10. Ching CT, Chow DH, Yao FY, Holmes AD (2003) The effect of cyclic compression on the mechanical properties of the inter-vertebral disc: an in vivo study in a rat tail model. Clin Biomech 18:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG (2005) Dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine 30(16 Suppl):S73–S78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Court C, Colliou OK, Chin JR, Liebenberg E, Bradford DS, Lotz JC (2001) The effect of static in vivo bending on the murine intervertebral disc. Spine J 1:239–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois B, de Germay B, Schaerer NS, Fennema P (1999) Dynamic neutralization: a new concept for restabilization of the spine. In: Szalski M, Gunzburg R, Pope MH (eds) Lumbar segmental instability. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 233–240

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dunlop RB, Adams MA, Hutton WC (1984) Disc space narrowing and the lumbar facet joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:706–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gottfried Y, Bradford DS, Oegema TR (1986) Facet joint changes after chemonucleosis-induced disc space narrowing. Spine 11:944–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guehring T, Unglaub F, Lorenz H, Omlor G, Wilke HJ, Kroeber MW (2006) Intradiscal pressure measurements in normal discs, compressed discs and compressed discs treated with axial posterior disc distraction: an experimental study on the rabbit lumbar spine model. Eur J Spine 15:597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guehring T, Omlor G, Lorenz H, Engelleiter K, Richter W, Carstens C, Kroeber W (2005) Axiale Distraktion beeinflusst Regenerationsprozesse mittelgradige degenerierter Bandscheiben. Presentation at the 1st combined German Congress of Orthopedics and Traumatology (DGU + DGOOC)

  19. Guigui P, Chopin D (1994) Assessment of the use of the Graf ligamentoplasty in the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Apropos of a series of 26 patients. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 80:681–688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hadlow SV, Fagan AB, Hillier TM, Fraser AD (1998) The Graf ligamentoplasty procedure. Comparison with posterolateral fusion in the management of low back pain. Spine 23:1172–1179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, Osada R, Tsuji H, Obata K (1997) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 22:1085–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsieh AH, Hadi T, Lotz JC (2005) MMP Degradation of annulus fibrosus is reduced by tension. Presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society

  23. Hsieh AH, Lotz JC (2003) Prolonged spinal loading induces matrix metalloproteinase-2 activation in intervertebral discs. Spine 28:1781–1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jansson KA, Nemeth G, Granath F, Blomqvist P (2004) Surgery for herniation of a lumbar disc in Sweden between 1987 and 1999 an analysis of 27,576 operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:841–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Konno S, Kikuchi S (2000) Prospective study of surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison between decompression alone and decompression with graf system stabilization. Spine 25:1533–1537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Lambiris E (2002) The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine. Stud Health Technol Inform 91:457–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Koureas G, Lambiris E (2004) Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results. Spine 29:735–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kroeber M, Unglaub F, Guehring T, Nerlich A, Hadi T, Lotz J, Carstens C (2005) Effects of controlled dynamic disc distraction on degenerated intervertebral discs. An in vivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model. Spine 30:181–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kwon SY, Moon SJ, Lee KS, Shim KC, Tack GR, Lee SJ (2005) Disc pressure changes with PMMA interspinous spinal spacer insertion for lumbar spinal stenosis. Poster at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society

  30. LeBlanc AD, Evans HJ, Schneider VS, Wendt RE III, Hedrick TD (1994) Changes in intervertebral disc cross-sectional area with bed rest and space flight. Spine 19:812–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, Weinstein JN, Reinarz SJ, el-Khoury GY, Colby H (1987) Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine 12:97–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF, Yerby SA (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine 28:2192–2197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lotz JC, Colliou OK, Chin JR, Duncan NA, Liebenberg E (1998) Compression-induced degeneration of the intervertebral disc: an in vivo mouse model and finite-element study. Spine 23:2493–2506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lotz JC, Chin JR (2000) Intervertebral disc cell death is dependent on the magnitude and duration of spinal loading. Spine 25:1477–1483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Meakin JR, Hukins DWL (2000) Effect of removing the nucleus pulposus on the deformation of the annulus fibrosus during compression of the intervertebral disc. J Biomech 33:575–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mimura M, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Crisco JJ, Yamamoto I, Vasavada A (1994) Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 19:1371–1380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Minns RJ, Walsh WK (1997) Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine. Spine 22:1819–1825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Moore RJ, Latham JM, Vernon-Roberts B, Fraser RD (1994) Does plate fixation prevent disc degeneration after a lateral anulus tear?. Spine 19:2787–2790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK (2002) Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl2):S198–S205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Neufeld JH (1992) Induced narrowing and back adaptation of lumbar intervertebral discs in biomechanically stressed rats. Spine 17:811–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Putzier M, Schneider SV, Funk JF, Tohtz SW, Perka C (2005) The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine 30:E109–E114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rahm MD, Hall BB (1996) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 9:392–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Schaller R (2004) Failed back surgery syndrome: the role of symptomatic segmental single-level instability after lumbar microdiscectomy. Eur Spin J 13:193–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2003) Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effect on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:418–423

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2006) Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure. Eur Spine J 21:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schnake KJ, Schären S, Jeanneret B (2006) Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 31:442–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Senegas J (2002) Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl2):S164–S169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sengupta DK, Mulholland RC (2005) Fulcrum assisted soft stabilization system: a new concept in the surgical treatment of degenerative low back pain. Spine 30:1019–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sengupta DK (2004) Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 35:43–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Specchia N (2004) Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine can help the disc repairing process. Presentation at the 4th Dynesos Meeting, Austria

  51. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11:170–178

    Google Scholar 

  52. Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF, Yerby SA (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine 28:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tanaka N, An HS, Lim TH, Fujiwara A, Jeon CH, Haughton VM (2001) The relationship between disc degeneration and flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine J 1:47–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Unglaub F, Lorenz H, Nerlich A, Richter W, Kroeber MW (2003) Stimulation of degenerative changes in the intervertebral disc through load in an animal model. Z Orthop 141:412–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Unglaub F, Guehring T, Omlor G, Lorenz H, Carstens C, Kroeber MW (2006) Controlled distraction as a therapeutic option in moderate degeneration of the intervertebral disc—an in vivo study in the rabbit-spine model. Z Orthop 144:68–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Urban JPG, Roberts S (2003) Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res Ther 5:120–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Urban JP, Smith S, Fairbank JC (2004) Nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Spine 29:2700–2709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yu S, Haughton VM, Ho PS, Sether LA Wagner M, Ho KC (1988) Progressive and regressive changes in the nucleus pulposus II. The adult. Radiology 169:93–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus John Schnake.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnake, K.J., Putzier, M., Haas, N.P. et al. Mechanical concepts for disc regeneration. Eur Spine J 15 (Suppl 3), 354–360 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0176-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0176-y

Keywords

Navigation