Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To study the characteristics and changes in the total Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and in its ten component items in female and male patients pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Ninety-eight patients [mean (SD) age 43 (13), 61% males] undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery were selected for this clinical 12-month follow-up. Subjective disability and back and leg pain were assessed by ODI version 1.0 and the visual analog scale. Pre-operatively females had a significantly higher mean (SD) total ODI [59(3)] than males [51(2)] (P = 0.030). Females were more disabled in the walking, sex life, social life and travelling items of the ODI compared to males. The total Oswestry decreased by 38 (95% CI − 44 to − 31) in females and by 34 (− 39 to − 30) in males at the 1-year follow-up. Most of the improvement (88% in females and 80% in males) occurred during the first 6 weeks; thereafter the changes were minor. In males the changes were greatest in pain, social life and travelling and in females in walking, social life and travelling. Internal consistency value of ODI was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.91). Item analysis of the ODI showed that all the items except pain had high corrected item correlation. As recovery following lumbar disc surgery occurred to a great extent during the first 6 weeks, the early post-operative outcome appears to be quite a reliable indicator of the overall post-operative outcome over the 1-year follow-up. The ODI proved to capture a wide range of disability in these lumbar disc surgery patients, thereby supporting the future use of the index. The “pain intensity” component, which collects data on the use of painkillers in version 1.0 of the ODI did not support the item structure of the index in this study. The use of ODI version 2.0 might remove this problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angevine PD, McCormick PC (2002) Outcomes research and lumbar discectomy. Neurosurg Focus 13:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, Egnatchik JG, Yu YJ, Clabeaux DE, Hyland AH (2002) Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg 96(1 Suppl):34–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30:927–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE (2001) Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol 28:431–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dedering A, Harms-Ringdahl K, Nemeth G (2005) Back extensor muscle fatigue in patients with lumbar disc herniation pre-operative and post-operative analysis of electromyography, endurance time and subjective factors. Eur Spine J:Jun 7; [Epub ahead of print]

  6. Deyo RA, Andersson G, Bombardier C, Cherkin DC, Keller RB, Lee CK, Liang MH, Lipscomb B, Shekelle P, Spratt KF, Weinstein JN (1994) Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain. Spine 19:2032S–2036S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon S, Bird H (1981) Reproducibility along a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 40:87–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Findlay GF, Hall BI, Musa BS, Oliveira MD, Fear SC (1998) A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine 15:1168–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Graven-Nielsen T, Lund H, Arendt-Nielsen L, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H (2002) Inhibition of maximal voluntary contraction force by experimental muscle pain: a centrally mediated mechanism. Muscle Nerve 26:708–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Graver V, Haaland AK, Magnaes B, Loeb M (1999) Seven-year clinical follow-up after lumbar disc surgery: results and predictors of outcome. Br J Neurosurg 13:178–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hartvigsen J, Christensen K, Frederiksen H (2004) Back and neck pain exhibit many common features in old age: a population-based study of 4,486 Danish twins 70–102 years of age. Spine 29:576–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the results of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishnan E, Sokka T, Häkkinen A, Hannonen P (2005) Impact of age and comorbidities on the criteria for remission and response in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 64:1350–1352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G (1999) Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine 24:2313–2317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore AJ, Chilton JD, Uttley D (1994) Long-term results of microlumbar discectomy. Br J Neurosurg 8:319–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ostelo R, de Vet HC (2005) Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:593–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stucki G, Sigl M (2003) Assessment of the impact of disease on the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17:451–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. WHO (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF, 1st edn. WHO, Geneva

  25. Wood EG, Hanley EN (1991) Lumbar disc herniation and open limited discectomy: indications, techniques, and results. Oper Tech Orthop 1:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine 26:652–657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Arja Häkkinen & Jari Ylinen

  2. Rheumatism Foundation Hospital, Heinola, Finland

    Hannu Kautiainen & Marja Arkela-Kautiainen

  3. Medcare Foundation, Äänekoski, Finland

    Salme Järvenpää

Authors
  1. Arja Häkkinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hannu Kautiainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salme Järvenpää
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marja Arkela-Kautiainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jari Ylinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arja Häkkinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Häkkinen, A., Kautiainen, H., Järvenpää, S. et al. Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 16, 347–352 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0187-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0187-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation