Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a prospective analysis of 129 patients operated for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Paucity of prospective data on surgical management of CSM, especially multilevel CSM (MCM), makes surgical decision making difficult. The objectives of the study were (1) to identify radiological patterns of cord compression (POC), and (2) to propose a surgical protocol based on POC and determine its efficacy. Average follow-up period was 2.8 years. Following POCs were identified: POC I: one or two levels of anterior cord compression. POC II: one or two levels of anterior and posterior compression. POC III: three levels of anterior compression. POC III variant: similar to POC III, associated with significant medical morbidity. POC IV: three or more levels of anterior compression in a developmentally narrow canal or with multiple posterior compressions. POC IV variant: similar to POC IV with one or two levels, being more significant than the others. POC V: three or more levels of compression in a kyphotic spine. Anterior decompression and reconstruction was chosen for POC I, II and III. Posterior decompression was chosen in POC III variant because they had more incidences of preoperative morbidity, in spite of being radiologically similar to POC III. Posterior surgery was also performed for POC IV and IV variant. For POC IV variant a targeted anterior decompression was considered after posterior decompression. The difference in the mJOA score before and after surgery for patients in each POC group was statistically significant. Anterior surgery in MCM had better result (mJOA = 15.9) versus posterior surgery (mJOA = 14.96), the difference being statistically significant. No major graft-related complications occurred in multilevel groups. The better surgical outcome of anterior surgery in MCM may make a significant difference in surgical outcome in younger and fitter patients like those of POC III whose expectations out of surgery are more. Judicious choice of anterior or posterior approach should be made after individualizing each case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSM:

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy

MCM:

Multilevel cervical myelopathy

POC:

Pattern of compression

ACDF:

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

ACCF:

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion

References

  1. Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine 27:2453–2458. doi:10.1097/00007632-200211150-00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosacco DN, Berman AT, Levenberg RJ et al (1992) Surgical results in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a countersunk interlocking autogenous iliac bone graft. Orthopedics 15:923–925

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carol MP, Ducker TB (1988) Cervical spondylitic myelopathies: surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord 1:59–65. doi:10.1097/00002517-198801000-00008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H (2002) Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine 27:1168–1175. doi:10.1097/00007632-200206010-00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards CC 2nd, Riew KD, Anderson PA et al (2003) Cervical myelopathy. Current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Spine J 3:68–81. doi:10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00566-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Emery SE, Bolesta MJ, Banks MA et al (1994) Robinson anterior cervical fusion comparison of the standard and modified techniques. Spine 19:660–663. doi:10.1097/00007632-199403001-00004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein JA (1989) The surgical management of cervical spinal stenosis, spondylosis, and myeloradiculopathy by means of the posterior approach, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geck MJ, Eismont FJ (2002) Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am 33:329–348. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(02)00002-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilibrand AS, Fye MA, Emery SE et al (2002) Increased rate of arthrodesis with strut grafting after multilevel anterior cervical decompression. Spine 27:146–151. doi:10.1097/00007632-200201150-00005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillard VH, Apfelbaum RI (2006) Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for multilevel cervical discectomy. Spine J 6:242S–251S. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata M et al (1985) Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:609–615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Irwin ZN, Hilibrand A, Gustavel M et al (2005) Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part II: cervical spine. Spine 30:2214–2219. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000181056.76595.f7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE et al (2000) Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 93:199–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Law MD Jr, Bernhardt M, White AA 3rd (1995) Evaluation and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Instr Course Lect 44:99–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morimoto T, Okuno S, Nakase H et al (1999) Cervical myelopathy due to dynamic compression by the laminectomy membrane: dynamic MR imaging study. J Spinal Disord 12:172–173. doi:10.1097/00002517-199904000-00017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Naderi S, Alberstone CD, Rupp FW et al (1996) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated with corpectomy: technique and results in 44 patients. Neurosurg Focus 1:e5 Discussion 1 p following e5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Naderi S, Benzel EC, Baldwin NG (1996) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical decision making. Neurosurg Focus 1:e1

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Orr RD, Zdeblick TA (1999) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Approaches to surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 58–66. doi:10.1097/00003086-199902000-00007

  19. Papadopoulos EC, Huang RC, Girardi FP et al (2006) Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: radiographic and clinical results. Spine 31:897–902. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000209348.17377.be

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rushton SA, Albert TJ (1998) Cervical degenerative disease: rationale for selecting the appropriate fusion technique (anterior, posterior, and 360 degree). Orthop Clin North Am 29:755–777. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70046-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y et al (2005) Long-term outcome of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to disc herniation: a comparative study of laminoplasty and anterior spinal fusion. Spine 30:756–759. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000157415.79713.7e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sasso RC, Ruggiero RA Jr, Reilly TM et al (2003) Early reconstruction failures after multilevel cervical corpectomy. Spine 28:140–142. doi:10.1097/00007632-200301150-00009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Suri A, Chabbra RP, Mehta VS et al (2003) Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 3:33–45. doi:10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00448-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Swank ML, Lowery GL, Bhat AL et al (1997) Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction. Eur Spine J 6:138–143. doi:10.1007/BF01358747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Scuderi GJ et al (1998) Early failure of long segment anterior cervical plate fixation. J Spinal Disord 11:410–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A et al (2001) Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 26:1443–1447. doi:10.1097/00007632-200107010-00011 discussion 8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM (1988) Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 13:856–860. doi:10.1097/00007632-198807000-00029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yasuoka S, Peterson HA, MacCarty CS (1982) Incidence of spinal column deformity after multilevel laminectomy in children and adults. J Neurosurg 57:441–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M et al (1992) Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 17:1281–1284. doi:10.1097/00007632-199211000-00004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zdeblick TA, Ducker TB (1991) The use of freeze-dried allograft bone for anterior cervical fusions. Spine 16:726–729. doi:10.1097/00007632-199107000-00006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. King Edward Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400 014, India

    Mihir R. Bapat, Kshitij Chaudhary, Amit Sharma & Vinod Laheri

  2. B-1002 Jagatvidya Society, Bandra (East), Mumbai, 400 051, India

    Mihir R. Bapat

Authors
  1. Mihir R. Bapat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kshitij Chaudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amit Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vinod Laheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihir R. Bapat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bapat, M.R., Chaudhary, K., Sharma, A. et al. Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases. Eur Spine J 17, 1651–1663 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0792-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0792-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation