Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Retrospective study on the results of microendoscopic decompression surgery for the treatment of cervical myelopathy. The purpose of this study was to describe the microendoscopic laminoplasty (MEL) technique as the surgical method in the treatment of cervical myelopathy, and to document the clinical outcomes for MEL surgery. Endoscopic surgery poses several challenges for the aspiring endoscopic surgeons, the most critical of which is mastering hand–eye coordination. With training in live animal and cadaver surgery, the technical progress has reduced the problem of morbidity following surgery. The authors have performed microendoscopic decompression surgery on more than 2,000 patients for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Fifty-one patients underwent the posterior decompression surgery using microendoscopy for cervical myelopathy at authors’ institute. The average age was 62.9 years. The criteria for exclusion were cervical myelopathy with tumor, trauma, severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, rheumatoid arthritis, pyogenic spondylitises, destructive spondylo-arthropathies, and other combined spinal lesions. The items evaluated were neurological evaluation, recovery rates; these were calculated following examination using the Hirabayashi’s method with the criteria proposed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system (JOA score). The mean follow-up period was 20.3 months. The average of JOA score was 10.1 points at the initial examination and 13.6 points at the final follow-up. The average recovery rate was 52.5%. The recovery rate according to surgical levels was, respectively, 56.5% in one level, 46.3% in two levels and 54.1% in more than three levels. The complications were as follows: one patient sustained a pin-hole-like dura mater injury inflicted by a high-speed air-drill during surgery, one patient developed an epidural hematoma 3 days after surgery, and two patients had the C5 nerve root palsy after surgery. The epidural hematoma was removed by the microendoscopy. All two C5 palsy improved with conservative therapy, such as a neck collar. These four patients on complications have returned to work at the final follow-up. This observation suggests that the clinical outcomes of microendoscopic surgery for cervical myelopathy were excellent or showed good results. This minimally invasive technique would be helpful in choosing a surgical method for cervical myelopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamason TE (2001) Microendoscopic posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy: results of a new technique in 100 cases. J Neurosurg 95(Suppl):51–57

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto M, Toyama Y (2006) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy—average 14-year follow-up study. Spine 31:2998–3005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, Maruiwa H, Watanabe M, Hirabayashi K (2002) Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 27:2108–2115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fessler RG, Khoo LT (2002) Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy: an initial clinical experience. Neurosurgery 51:S37–S45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine 27:432–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8:693–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T, Oga M, Nakano S, Sasaki K, Goshi K, Yo M, Fukagawa S (2005) Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2:624–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, Ohmori K, Abe Y, Kimura T (2003) Pathomechanism of myelopathy and surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine 28:2209–2214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 51:S146–S154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McAfee PC, Regan JR, Zdeblick T, Zuckerman J, Picetti GD, Heim S, Geis WP, Fedder IL (1995) The incidence of complications in endoscopic anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstructive surgery. A prospective multicenter study comprising the first 100 consecutive cases. Spine 20:1623–1632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McCulloch JA (1991) Microsurgical spinal laminotomies. In: Frymoyer JW (ed) The adult spine: principles and practice. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Minoda Y, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Yamano Y, Takaoka K (2003) Palsy of the C5 nerve root after midsagittal-splitting laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine 28:1123–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakagawa Y, Yoshida M, Kawakami M, Ando M, Hashizume H, Minamide A, Maio K, Enyo Y, Okada T (2006) Posterior endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation with contralateral symptoms—a report of two cases. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49:282–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nowitzke AM (2005) Assessment of the learning curve for lumbar microendoscopic discectomy. Neurosurgery 56:755–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R (2002) Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 97:213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Perez-Cruet MJ, Foley KT, Isaacs RE, Rice-Wyllie L, Wellington R, Smith MM, Fessler RG (2002) Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical note. Neurosurgery 51:S129–S136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H (2003) C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine 28:2447–2451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Fujiwara Y, Kamei N, Ochi M (2006) Postoperative segmental C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty may occur without intraoperative nerve injury: a prospective study with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials. Spine 31:3013–3017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsai RY, Yang RS, Bray RS Jr (1998) Microscopic laminotomies for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spin Disord 11:389–394

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiner BK, Walker M, Brower RS, McCulloch JA (1999) Microsurgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 24:2268–2272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yabuki S, Kikuchi S (2005) Endoscopic partial laminectomy for cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2:170–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 26:1890–1894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshida M, Otani K, Shibasaki K, Ueda S (1992) Expansive laminoplasty with reattachment of spinous process and extensor musculature for cervical myelopathy. Spine 17:491–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama City, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan

    Akihito Minamide, Munehito Yoshida, Hiroshi Yamada, Yukihiro Nakagawa, Kazuhiro Maio, Masaki Kawai & Hiroshi Iwasaki

Authors
  1. Akihito Minamide
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Munehito Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hiroshi Yamada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yukihiro Nakagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kazuhiro Maio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Masaki Kawai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hiroshi Iwasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akihito Minamide.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minamide, A., Yoshida, M., Yamada, H. et al. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 19, 487–493 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1233-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1233-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation