Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Failure modes in conservative and surgical management of infectious spondylodiscitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose and methods

We reviewed the management, failure modes, and outcomes of 196 patients treated for infectious spondylodiscitis between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010, at the Spinal Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Patients with infectious spondylodiscitis at the site of previous spinal instrumentation, spinal metastases, and tuberculous and fungal spondylodiscitis were excluded.

Results

Mean age at the time of treatment was 59 (range 1–89) years. The most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus. The lumbosacral spine was affected in 64 % of patients and the thoracic in 21 %. In 24 % of patients, there were neurologic compromise, four had the cauda equina syndrome and ten patients were paraplegic. Ninety-one patients were managed conservatively. Treatment failed in 12 cases, 7 patients required re-admission, 3 in-hospital deaths occurred, and 5 patients died during follow-up. Posterior debridement with pedicle screw instrumentation was performed in 75, without instrumentation in 19 cases. Seven patients underwent anterior debridement alone, and in 16 cases, anterior debridement was combined with pedicle screw instrumentation, one of which was a two-stage procedure. Re-operation took place in 12 patients during the same hospitalization and in a further 12 during follow-up. Two in-hospital deaths occurred, and five patients died during follow-up.

Patients were followed for 1 year after treatment. Eight (9 %) patients treated conservatively had a mild degree of back pain, and one (1 %) patient presented with mild muscular weakness. Among surgically treated patients, 12 (10 %) had only mild neurological impairment, one foot drop, one cauda equine dysfunction, but 4 were paraplegic. Twenty-seven (23 %) complained of varying degrees of back pain.

Conclusions

Conservative measures are safe and effective for carefully selected patients without spondylodiscitic complications. Failure of conservative therapy requires surgery that can guarantee thorough debridement, decompression, restoration of spinal alignment, and correction of instability. Surgeons should master various techniques to achieve adequate debridement, and pedicle screw instrumentation may safely be used if needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bettini N, Girardo M, Dema E, Cervellati S (2009) Evaluation of conservative treatment of non specific spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):143–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler JS, Shelly MJ, Timlin M, Powderly WG, O’Byrne JM (2006) Nontuberculous pyogenic spinal infection in adults: a 12-year experience from a tertiary referral center. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2695–2700

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen WH, Jiang LS, Dai LY (2007) Surgical treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis with spinal instrumentation. Eur Spine J 16:1307–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cottle L, Riordan T (2008) Infectious spondylodiscitis. J Infect 56:401–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dai LY, Chen WH, Jiang LS (2008) Anterior instrumentation for the treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis of thoracic and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 17:1027–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalvo A, Abdulla I, Riazi A, De La Harpe D (2011) Single-level/single-stage debridement and posterior instrumented fusion in the treatment of spontaneous pyogenic osteomyelitis/discitis: long-term functional outcome and health-related quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:110–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gouliouris T, Aliyu SH, Brown NM (2010) Spondylodiscitis: update on diagnosis and management. J Antimicrob Chemother 65 Suppl 3:iii11–iii24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto AJ (2000) Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1668–1679

  9. Hadjipavlou AG, Katonis PK, Gaitanis IN, Muffoletto AJ, Tzermiadianos MN, Crow W (2004) Percutaneous transpedicular discectomy and drainage in pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 13:707–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hempelmann RG, Mater E, Schon R (2010) Septic hematogenous lumbar spondylodiscitis in elderly patients with multiple risk factors: efficacy of posterior stabilization and interbody fusion with iliac crest bone graft. Eur Spine J 19:1720–1727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito M, Abumi K, Kotani Y, Kadoya K, Minami A (2007) Clinical outcome of posterolateral endoscopic surgery for pyogenic spondylodiscitis: results of 15 patients with serious comorbid conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:200–206

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karadimas EJ, Bunger C, Lindblad BE, Hansen ES, Hoy K, Helmig P, Kannerup AS, Niedermann B (2008) Spondylodiscitis. A retrospective study of 163 patients. Acta Orthop 79:650–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kayser R, Mahlfeld K, Greulich M, Grasshoff H (2005) Spondylodiscitis in childhood: results of a long-term study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:318–323

    Google Scholar 

  14. Korovessis P, Repantis T, Iliopoulos P, Hadjipavlou A (2008) Beneficial influence of titanium mesh cage on infection healing and spinal reconstruction in hematogenous septic spondylitis: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of twenty-five consecutive cases and review of literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E759–E767

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liljenqvist U, Lerner T, Bullmann V, Hackenberg L, Halm H, Winkelmann W (2003) Titanium cages in the surgical treatment of severe vertebral osteomyelitis. Eur Spine J 12:606–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Okada Y, Miyamoto H, Uno K, Sumi M (2009) Clinical and radiological outcome of surgery for pyogenic and tuberculous spondylitis: comparisons of surgical techniques and disease types. J Neurosurg Spine 11:620–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pee YH, Park JD, Choi YG, Lee SH (2008) Anterior debridement and fusion followed by posterior pedicle screw fixation in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: autologous iliac bone strut versus cage. J Neurosurg Spine 8:405–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Skaf GS, Domloj NT, Fehlings MG, Bouclaous CH, Sabbagh AS, Kanafani ZA, Kanj SS (2010) Pyogenic spondylodiscitis: an overview. J Infect Public Health 3:5–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshimoto M, Takebayashi T, Kawaguchi S, Tsuda H, Ida K, Wada T, Yamashita T (2011) Pyogenic spondylitis in the elderly: a report from Japan with the most aging society. Eur Spine J 20:649–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zaveri GR, Mehta SS (2009) Surgical treatment of lumbar tuberculous spondylodiscitis by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kestutis Valancius.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valancius, K., Hansen, E.S., Høy, K. et al. Failure modes in conservative and surgical management of infectious spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 22, 1837–1844 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2614-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2614-3

Keywords

Navigation