Skip to main content
Log in

Kinematic study of the relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and degenerative changes in the cervical intervertebral disc

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We located the instantaneous center of rotation (ICR) for the cervical spine at various ages and investigated age-related changes. We evaluated the impact of cervical disc degeneration on the ICR using a scoring system based on plain radiographs.

Methods

Flexion, extension, and neutral lateral radiographs were obtained from 680 asymptomatic subjects (363 men, 317 women; ages 20–79 years) divided into six 10-year-age groups. The ICRs from C3/C4 to C6/C7 were determined from the radiographs using MIMICS software. A scoring system determined from lateral radiographs quantitatively assessed degeneration of cervical intervertebral discs. ICRs were compared among groups to analyze age-related changes and the relation between degenerative changes and ICR location.

Results

In asymptomatic subjects, the ICR was located approximately at the superior half of the lower vertebral body height and the posterior half of its width. The ICR at the C5/C6 level was located more anterior and higher in patients >50 years than in younger subgroups (P < 0.05). Degenerative changes produced more anterosuperior translation of the ICR, which was significantly correlated with height loss (P < 0.05). In moderately or severely degenerated segments, the ICR location change reached statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Baseline data for Chinese cervical spine ICRs were established for the third through eighth decade of life, including age-related changes and the kinematic effects of degenerative change on the ICR in the functional spine unit. These findings should be considered in clinical practice and when designing disc prostheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG (2011) Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: 4-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93:1684–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Brayda-Bruno M, Fornari M (2008) Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review. Clin Biomech 23(9):1095–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogduk N, Mercer S (2000) Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 15:633–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schneider G, Pearcy MJ, Bogduk N (2005) Abnormal motion in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 30:1159–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Penning L (1964) Nonpathologic and pathologic relationships between the lower cervical vertebrae. Am J Roentgenol 91:1036–1050

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Amevo B, Worth D, Bogduk N (1991) Instantaneous axes of rotation of the typical cervical motion segments: a study in normal volunteers. Clin Biomech 6:111–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. White A, Panjabi M (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amevo B, Aprill C, Bogduk N (1991) Instantaneous axes of rotation of the typical cervical motion segments: I. An empirical study of technical errors. Clin Biomech 6:31–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frobin W, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Brinckmann P (2002) Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults. Clin Biomech 17(1):21–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walraevens J, Liu B, Meersschaert J, Demaerel P, Delye H, Depreitere B, Vander Sloten J, Goffin J (2009) Qualitative and quantitative assessment of degeneration of cervical intervertebral discs and facet joints. Eur Spine J 18(3):358–369

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Amevo B, Aprill C, Bogduk N (1992) Abnormal instantaneous axes of rotation in patients with neck pain. Spine 17:748–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Subramanian N, Reitman CA, Nguyen L, Hipp JA (2007) Radiographic assessment and quantitative motion analysis of the cervical spine after serial sectioning of the anterior ligamentous structures. Spine 32:518–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang H, Hipp JA, Ben-Galim P, Reitman CA (2008) Threshold cervical range-of-motion necessary to detect abnormal intervertebral motion in cervical spine radiographs. Spine 33:E261–E267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T (2012) Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 21(8):1492–1498

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bogduk N, Amevo B, Pearcy M (1995) A biological basis for instantaneous centres of rotation of the vertebral column. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 209:177–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rousseau MA, Cottin P, Levante S, Nogier A, Lazennec JY, Skalli W (2008) In vivo kinematics of two types of ball-and-socket cervical disc replacements in the sagittal plane: cranial versus caudal geometric center. Spine 33(1):E6–E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park DK, Lin EL, Phillips FM (2011) Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis. Spine 36:721–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adams MA, Roughley PJ (2006) What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(18):2151–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Le Maitre CL, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA (2007) Accelerated cellular senescence in degenerate intervertebral discs: a possible role in the pathogenesis of intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther 9(3):R45

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gore DR (2001) Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a 10-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(22):2463–2466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Okada E, Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Hashimoto T, Ogawa J, Watanabe M, Takahata T (2009) Aging of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(7):706–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sears WR, Duggal N, Sekhon LH, Williamson OD (2007) Segmental malalignment with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis-contributing factors. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(2):111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim SK, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC (2008) Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 17:20–29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 81171764).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baoge Liu.

Additional information

Baoge Liu and Zhenyu Liu made equal contribution to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, B., Liu, Z., VanHoof, T. et al. Kinematic study of the relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and degenerative changes in the cervical intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J 23, 2307–2313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3431-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3431-7

Keywords

Navigation