Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Literature studies showed a very wide range of pedicle screw loosening rates after thoracolumbar stabilization, ranging from less than 1 to 15 % in non-osteoporotic patients treated with rigid systems and even higher in osteoporotic subjects or patients treated with dynamic systems. Firstly, this paper aims to investigate how much this complication is affecting the success rate of pedicle screw fixation, in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic patients, and to discuss the biomechanical reasons which may be related to the variability of the rates found in the literature. The secondary aim was to summarize and discuss the published definitions and conventions about screw loosening from a clinical and radiological point of view.

Methods

Narrative literature review.

Results

Screw loosening appears to be a minor problem for fixation and fusion of healthy, non-osteoporotic bone. Pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic bone is believed to be at risk of loosening, but clinical data are actually scarce. Both expandable and augmented screws may be a viable option to reduce the risk of loosening, but clinical evidence is missing. Posterior motion-preserving implants seems to have a significant risk of screw loosening. Standardization appears to be lacking regarding the radiological assessment. Marked differences in the loosening rates found based either on planar radiography or on CT scanning were observed.

Conclusions

Reported loosening rates primarily depended on the protocol used for the clinical examination during follow-up and on the conventions used for the radiological assessment. Aiming to a better comparability of published data, we recommend the authors of clinical studies to describe which criteria were used to assess a loosened screw, as well as the protocol of the clinical follow-up examination. Low-dose CT should be used for the assessment of screw loosening whenever possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abul-Kasim K, Overgaard A, Maly P, Ohlin A, Gunnarsson M, Sundgren PC (2009) Low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) in the perioperative workup of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Radiol 19:610–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abul-Kasim K, Strombeck A, Ohlin A, Maly P, Sundgren PC (2009) Reliability of low-radiation dose CT in the assessment of screw placement after posterior scoliosis surgery, evaluated with a new grading system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:941–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abul-Kasim K (2010) Low-dose spine CT: optimisation and clinical implementation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139:169–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A, Strombeck A, Maly P, Sundgren PC (2010) Radiological and clinical outcome of screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation with low-dose computed tomography. Eur Spine J 19:96–104

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A (2014) Evaluation of implant loosening following segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2 year follow-up with low-dose CT. Scoliosis 9:13-7161-9-13 (eCollection 2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amendola L, Gasbarrini A, Fosco M, Simoes CE, Terzi S, De Iure F, Boriani S (2011) Fenestrated pedicle screws for cement-augmented purchase in patients with bone softening: a review of 21 cases. J Orthop Traumatol 12:193–199

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Asazuma T, Yamugishi M, Sato M, Ichimura S, Fujikawa K, Crock HV (2004) Posterior spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases using the Crock-Yamagishi (C-Y) spinal fixation system. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:174–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker S, Chavanne A, Spitaler R, Kropik K, Aigner N, Ogon M, Redl H (2008) Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Eur Spine J 17:1462–1469

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berjano P, Bassani R, Casero G, Sinigaglia A, Cecchinato R, Lamartina C (2013) Failures and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 6):S853–S858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boos N, Webb JK (1997) Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view. Eur Spine J 6:2–18

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Botolin S, Merritt C, Erickson M (2013) Aseptic loosening of pedicle screw as a result of metal wear debris in a pediatric patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E38–E42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burval DJ, McLain RF, Milks R, Inceoglu S (2007) Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1077–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen YL, Chen WC, Chou CW, Chen JW, Chang CM, Lai YS, Cheng CK, Wang ST (2014) Biomechanical study of expandable pedicle screw fixation in severe osteoporotic bone comparing with conventional and cement-augmented pedicle screws. Med Eng Phys 36:1416–1420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Choi SW, Yoon YH, Won MH (2009) Arthrodesis to L5 versus S1 in long instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18:531–537

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho W, Cho SK, Wu C (2010) The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1061–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cook SD, Barbera J, Rubi M, Salkeld SL, Whitecloud TS 3rd (2001) Lumbosacral fixation using expandable pedicle screws. an alternative in reoperation and osteoporosis. Spine J 1:109–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dakhil-Jerew F, Jadeja H, Cohen A, Shepperd JA (2009) Inter-observer reliability of detecting Dynesys pedicle screw using plain X-rays: a study on 50 post-operative patients. Eur Spine J 18:1486–1493

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Di Silvestre M, Parisini P, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G (2007) Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1655–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Silvestre M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F, Vommaro F, Martikos K, Parisini P (2008) Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation. Eur Spine J 17:1336–1349

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL (1992) Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 267:374–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR (1991) Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337:867–872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. El Saman A, Meier S, Sander A, Kelm A, Marzi I, Laurer H (2013) Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 39(5):455–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V (1993) Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:2231–2238 (discussion 2238–9)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fan L, Yang B, Shi Q, Xu Y, Chen L, Chen J, Zheng W (2012) Treatment of single-incision vertebral screw–rod fixation combined with pedicle screw–rod fixation for thoracolumbar tuberculosis. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 26:1062–1065

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Faraj AA, Webb JK (1997) Early complications of spinal pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 6:324–326

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fay LY, Wu JC, Tsai TY, Wu CL, Huang WC, Cheng H (2013) Dynamic stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis: evaluation of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:535–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frankel BM, Jones T, Wang C (2007) Segmental polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation in patients with bone softening caused by osteoporosis and metastatic tumor involvement: a clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery 61:531–537 (discussion 537–8)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Glaser J, Stanley M, Sayre H, Woody J, Found E, Spratt K (2003) A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1390–1395

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hallab NJ, Cunningham BW, Jacobs JJ (2003) Spinal implant debris-induced osteolysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:S125–S138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hasegawa T, Inufusa A, Imai Y, Mikawa Y, Lim TH, An HS (2005) Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study. Spine J 5:239–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B (1992) The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:124–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hwang JH, Modi HN, Yang JH, Kim SJ, Lee SH (2009) Short segment pedicle screw fixation for unstable T11-L2 fractures: with or without fusion? A three-year follow-up study. Acta Orthop Belg 75:822–827

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kahanovitz N (1992) Osteoporosis and fusion. Instr Course Lect 41:231–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kang SH, Kim KT, Park SW, Kim YB (2011) A case of pedicle screw loosening treated by modified transpedicular screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 49:75–78

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ko CC, Tsai HW, Huang WC, Wu JC, Chen YC, Shih YH, Chen HC, Wu CL, Cheng H (2010) Screw loosening in the Dynesys stabilization system: radiographic evidence and effect on outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28:E10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kocak T, Cakir B, Reichel H, Mattes T (2010) Screw loosening after posterior dynamic stabilization–review of the literature. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 77:134–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Goss BG, Stauffer E, Ettinger L, Aebli N (2012) Effect of vertebral cement augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate on intervertebral disc and bone tissue. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100:660–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, O’Brien MF, Lehman RA Jr, Polly DW Jr, Schroeder TM (2005) Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90 degrees. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumano K, Hirabayashi S, Ogawa Y, Aota Y (1994) Pedicle screws and bone mineral density. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:1157–1161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lazary A, Speer G, Varga PP, Balla B, Bacsi K, Kosa JP, Nagy Z, Takacs I, Lakatos P (2008) Effect of vertebroplasty filler materials on viability and gene expression of human nucleus pulposus cells. J Orthop Res 26:601–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Li T, Xiao R, Guan Q, Wang M, Dong C (2012) Improved method of treating thoracolumbar burst fracture by posterior pedicle fixation and grafting through injured vertebrae. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 26:546–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lutz JA, Otten P, Maestretti G (2012) Late infections after dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with Dynesys. Eur Spine J 21:2573–2579

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. McAfee PC, Weiland DJ, Carlow JJ (1991) Survivorship analysis of pedicle spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:S422–S427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR (1993) Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:162–167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ohlin A, Karlsson M, Duppe H, Hasserius R, Redlund-Johnell I (1994) Complications after transpedicular stabilization of the spine. A survivorship analysis of 163 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2774–2779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Kamoda H, Suzuki M, Kubota G, Sakuma Y, Oikawa Y, Inage K, Sainoh T, Takaso M, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2013) Comparison of teriparatide and bisphosphonate treatment to reduce pedicle screw loosening after lumbar spinal fusion surgery in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a bone quality perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E487–E492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K (1999) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study of complications after facet joint excision and pedicle screw fixation in 148 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 70:329–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K (2000) Can insertional torque predict screw loosening and related failures? An in vivo study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:858–864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K (2001) Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Spine J 1:402–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ozawa T, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Ohtori S, Aoki Y, Saito T, Inoue G, Ito T, Moriya H (2005) Insertional torque of the lumbar pedicle screw during surgery. J Orthop Sci 10:133–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pihlajamaki H, Myllynen P, Bostman O (1997) Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:183–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ponnusamy KE, Iyer S, Gupta G, Khanna AJ (2011) Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: biomechanical and clinical considerations. Spine J 11:54–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Razak M, Mahmud MM, Hyzan MY, Omar A (2000) Short segment posterior instrumentation, reduction and fusion of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures—a review of 26 cases. Med J Malays 55(Suppl C):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rollinghoff M, Schluter-Brust K, Groos D, Sobottke R, Michael JW, Eysel P, Delank KS (2010) Mid-range outcomes in 64 consecutive cases of multilevel fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2:e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Saito H, Gill CJ (2014) How Frequently Do the Results from Completed US Clinical Trials Enter the Public Domain?—A Statistical Analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov Database. PLoS One 9:e101826

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sanden B, Olerud C, Johansson C, Larsson S (2001) Improved bone-screw interface with hydroxyapatite coating: an in vivo study of loaded pedicle screws in sheep. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2673–2678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sanden B, Olerud C, Petren-Mallmin M, Larsson S (2002) Hydroxyapatite coating improves fixation of pedicle screws. A clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:387–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sanden B, Olerud C, Petren-Mallmin M, Johansson C, Larsson S (2004) The significance of radiolucent zones surrounding pedicle screws. Definition of screw loosening in spinal instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:457–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Schatzker J, Horne JG, Sumner-Smith G (1975) The effect of movement on the holding power of screws in bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 111:257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V (2009) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 33:1683–1688

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Shea TM, Laun J, Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Doulgeris JJ, Lee WE 3rd, Aghayev K, Vrionis FD (2014) Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status. Biomed Res Int 2014:748393

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Smith TO, Williams TH, Samuel A, Ogonda L, Wimhurst JA (2011) Reliability of the radiological assessments of radiolucency and loosening in total hip arthroplasty using PACS. Hip Int 21:577–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Soini J, Laine T, Pohjolainen T, Hurri H, Alaranta H (1993) Spondylodesis augmented by transpedicular fixation in the treatment of olisthetic and degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 297:111–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S170–S178

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Kim JH, Chung ER (2001) Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2049–2057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Upasani VV, Farnsworth CL, Tomlinson T, Chambers RC, Tsutsui S, Slivka MA, Mahar AT, Newton PO (2009) Pedicle screw surface coatings improve fixation in nonfusion spinal constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. van der Werf M, Lezuo P, Maissen O, van Donkelaar CC, Ito K (2007) Inhibition of vertebral endplate perfusion results in decreased intervertebral disc intranuclear diffusive transport. J Anat 211:769–774

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Villa T, La Barbera L, Galbusera F (2014) Comparative analysis of international standards for the fatigue testing of posterior spinal fixation systems. Spine J 14:695–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang RY, Hua YJ, Chen JH, Chai JL, Shao LF, Zhao JF (2012) Single-segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures through the gap of paravertebral muscles. Zhongguo Gu Shang 25:42–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wu JC, Huang WC, Tsai HW, Ko CC, Wu CL, Tu TH, Cheng H (2011) Pedicle screw loosening in dynamic stabilization: incidence, risk, and outcome in 126 patients. Neurosurg Focus 31:E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Wu ZX, Cui G, Lei W, Fan Y, Wan SY, Ma ZS, Sang HX (2010) Application of an expandable pedicle screw in the severe osteoporotic spine: a preliminary study. Clin Invest Med 33:E368–E374

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wu ZX, Gong FT, Liu L, Ma ZS, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Yang M, Lei W, Sang HX (2012) A comparative study on screw loosening in osteoporotic lumbar spine fusion between expandable and conventional pedicle screws. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Xie J, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2011) The safe placement of upper and middle thoracic pedicle screws in pediatric deformity. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Xie Y, Ma H, Li H, Ding W, Zhao C, Zhang P, Zhao J (2012) Comparative study of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthopedics 35:e1517–e1523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Yang X, Kong Q, Song Y, Liu H, Zeng J, Liu L (2012) Clinical application of pedicle screw fixation under guidance of computer assisted navigation in patients with osteoporosis. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 26:196–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Yuan HA, Garfin SR, Dickman CA, Mardjetko SM (1994) A Historical Cohort Study of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracic, Lumbar, and Sacral Spinal Fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2279S–2296S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Zeng ZY, Zhang JQ, Jin CY, Wang B, Jiang CY, Wu P, Yan WF (2012) Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures using pedicle screws fixation at the level of the fracture: results for following up more than 2 years. Zhongguo Gu Shang 25:128–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang JW, Xiao BP, Xu RM, Zhao LJ, Ma WH, Ruan YP (2009) Analysis of safety and effect of reconstructing anterior and middle columns by single posterior approach in treating lumbar burst fractures. Chin J Traumatol 12:107–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy through the Central Innovation Program SME (project KF3180101JL3) is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Galbusera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galbusera, F., Volkheimer, D., Reitmaier, S. et al. Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?. Eur Spine J 24, 1005–1016 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6

Keywords

Navigation