Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence of vascular complications during lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an examination of the mini-open access technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This article examines the incidence and management of vascular injury during Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF). The details of the mini-open access technique are presented.

Methods

A total of 900 patients who underwent a LLIF at an average 1.94 levels (range: 1–5 levels) by one of six fellowship trained surgeons on 1,754 levels from 2006 to 2013 were identified. The incidence of intraoperative vascular injury was retrospectively determined from the Operative Records. The management of vascular injury was evaluated. The mini-open access adapted by our institution for LLIF is described.

Results

The incidence of major vascular complication in our series was 1/900. The incidence of minor vascular injury was 4/900. The overall incidence of vascular injury was calculated to be 0.056 % per case and 0.029 % per level. All minor vascular injuries were identified to be segmental vessel lacerations, which were readily ligated under direct visualization without further extension of the incision with no clinical sequelae. The laceration of the abdominal aorta, the major vascular complication of this series, was emergently repaired through an exploratory laparotomy. None of the patients suffered long-term sequelae from their intraoperative vascular injuries.

Conclusions

The mini-open lateral access technique for LLIF provides for minimal risk of vascular injury to the lumbar spine. In the rare event of minor vascular injury, the mini-open access approach allows for immediate visualization, confirmation and repair of the vessel with no long-term sequelae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6(4):435–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(26 Suppl):S302–S311. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182023438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aghayev K, Vrionis FD (2013) Mini-open lateral retroperitoneal lumbar spine approach using psoas muscle retraction technique. Technical report and initial results on six patients. Eur Spine J 22(9):2113–2119. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2931-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuan PS, Rowshan K, Verma RB, Miller LE, Block JE (2014) Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion with direct psoas visualization. J Orthop Surg Res 9(1):20. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-9-20

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardenbrook MA, Miller LE, Block JE (2013) TranS1 VEO system: a novel psoas-sparing device for transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Med Devices (Auckl) 6:91–95. doi:10.2147/MDER.S43746

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pumberger M, Hughes AP, Huang RR et al (2012) Neurologic deficit following lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21(6):1192–1199. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2087-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taher F, Hughes AP, Lebl DR et al (2013) Contralateral motor deficits after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22):1959–1963. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a463a9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lykissas MG, Aichmair A, Hughes AP et al (2014) Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors. Spine J 14(5):749–758. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fantini GA, Pawar AY (2013) Access related complications during anterior exposure of the lumbar spine. World J Orthop 4(1):19–23. doi:10.5312/wjo.v4.i1.19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aichmair A, Fantini GA, Garvin S, Beckman J, Girardi FP (2013) Aortic perforation during lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech [Epub ahead of print]

  11. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(1):26–32. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e1040a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prince EA, Ahn SH (2013) Basic vascular neuroanatomy of the brain and spine: what the general interventional radiologist needs to know. Semin Intervent Radiol 30(3):234–239. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1353475

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shimizu S, Tanaka R, Kan S et al (2005) Origins of the segmental arteries in the aorta: an anatomic study for selective catheterization with spinal arteriography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(4):922–928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berenstein A, Lasjaunias P, Ter Brugge KG (2001) Spinal and spinal cord arteries and veins. In: Berenstein A, Lasjaunias P, Ter Brugge KG (eds) Surgical neuroangiography. Clinical vascular anatomy and variations, vol 2nd. Springer, New York, pp 73–164

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kao FC, Tsai TT, Chen LH, et al (2014) Symptomatic epidural hematoma after lumbar decompression surgery. Eur Spine J [Epub ahead of print]

  16. Amiri AR, Fouyas IP, Cro S, Casey AT (2013) Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (SEH): incidence, risk factors, onset, and management. Spine J 13(2):134–140. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Regan JJ, Aronoff RJ, Ohnmeiss DD, Sengupta DK (1999) Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(20):2171–2174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Khajavi K, Shen AY (2014) Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Eur Spine J 23(6):1215–1223. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3246-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith AG, Capobianco R, Cher D et al (2013) Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Innov Res 7(1):14. doi:10.1186/1750-1164-7-14

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh K, Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A et al (2013) A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 13:01723–01733. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR et al (2002) Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 51(1):97–103 (discussion 103-5)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P et al (1999) Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg 91(1 Suppl):60–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ, Heggeness MH (1993) Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(15):2227–2230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Flynn JC, Price CT (1984) Sexual complications of anterior fusion of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9(5):489–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fantini GA, Pappou IP, Girardi FP, Sandhu HS, Cammisa FP Jr (2007) Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(24):2751–2758

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There were no sources of financial support or perceived conflicts of interest for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janina Kueper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kueper, J., Fantini, G.A., Walker, B.R. et al. Incidence of vascular complications during lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an examination of the mini-open access technique. Eur Spine J 24, 800–809 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3796-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3796-2

Keywords

Navigation