Skip to main content
Log in

National representation in the spine literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited spine journals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Significant progress has been seen in the field of spine in recent years as a consequence of worldwide contributions. However, the national productivity to the field of spine is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the national contributions in the field of spine.

Methods

Web of Science was searched for articles published in the five highly cited spine journals from 2009 to 2013, including The Spine Journal, European Spine Journal, Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. The number of total articles, the per capita numbers, impact factors, citations and funding source were recorded and analyzed.

Results

A total number of 6920 articles were published in the five journals from 2009 to 2013 worldwide. North America, East Asia, and West Europe were the most productive world areas. High-income countries published 83.97 % of articles, middle-income 16.01 %, and lower-income just 0.01 %. The United States published the most number of articles (35.79 %), followed by China, Japan, South Korea, and Canada, and had the highest total impact factors and the highest total citations. However, when normalized to population size, Switzerland had the highest number of articles per million populations, followed by The Netherlands and Sweden.

Conclusions

The majority of the spine articles are published by authors from high-income countries while few publications from low-income countries. The United States is the most productive country in the field of spine. However, some European countries may be more productive when normalized to population size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langer A, Diaz-Olavarrieta C, Berdichevsky K, Villar J (2004) Why is research from developing countries underrepresented in international health literature, and what can be done about it? Bull World Health Organ 82(10):802–803

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bakker IS, Wevers KP, Hoekstra HJ (2013) Geographical distribution of publications in the scientific field of surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 108(8):505–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Q, Jiang Y, Zhang M (2012) National representation in the emergency medicine literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. Am J Emerg Med 30(8):1530–1534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bould MD, Boet S, Riem N, Kasanda C, Sossou A, Bruppacher HR (2010) National representation in the anaesthesia literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited anaesthesia journals. Anaesthesia 65(8):799–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang WJ, Ding W, Jiang H, Zhang YF, Zhang JL (2013) National representation in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. Ann Plast Surg 70(2):231–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li Z, Qiu LX, Wu FX, Yang LQ, Sun YM, Lu ZJ, Yu WF (2012) Assessing the national productivity in subspecialty critical care medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis. J Crit Care 27(6):747.e1–e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Institute for Scientific Information (2014) ISI Journal Citation Reports 2013. http://isiknowledge.com. Accessed 10 Oct 2014

  8. World Bank Data Development Group (2014) World Bank list of economies. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/countryand-lending-groups. Accessed 10 Oct 2014

  9. Central Intelligence Agency (2014) The world factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/. Accessed 10 Oct 2014

  10. Lynch JR, Cunningham MR, Warme WJ, Schaad DC, Wolf FM, Leopold SS (2007) Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):1010–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray MR, Wang T, Schroeder GD, Hsu WK (2012) The 100 most cited spine articles. Eur Spine J 21(10):2059–2069

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Saxena S, Paraje G, Sharan P, Karam G, Sadana R (2006) The 10/90 divide in mental health research: trends over a 10-year period. Br J Psychiatry 188:81–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jia Z, Ding F, Wu Y, He Q, Ruan D (2015) The 50 most-cited articles in orthopaedic surgery from mainland China. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(7):2423–2430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tong D, Wang L, Jiang J (2013) Publications from China in The Lancet, NEJM, and JAMA. Lancet 381(9882):1983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sreekar H, Dawre S, Lamba S, Gupta AK (2012) Trend of India’s Contribution to the Field of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Ann Plast Surg 69(2):223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jia ZW, Wu YH, Li H, Li HF, Zhao XY, Tang Y, Yao CL, Zhao YC, Liu LG, Wang L, He Q, Ruan DK (2015) Growing trend of China’s contribution to the field of spine: a 10-year survey of the literature. Eur Spine J 24:1806–1812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo X, Liang Z, Gong F, Bao H, Huang L, Jia Z (2015) Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009-2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. J Foot Ankle Res 8:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang Z, Luo X, Gong F, Bao H, Qian H, Jia Z, Li G (2015) Worldwide research productivity in the field of arthroscopy: a bibliometric analysis. Arthroscopy 31:1452–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amiri AR, Kanesalingam K, Cro S, Casey AT (2014) Does source of funding and conflict of interest influence the outcome and quality of spinal research? Spine J 14(2):308–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Errico T (2010) The promethean role of industry in spine surgery research. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(8):491–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank many of our colleagues for their helps in collecting data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

F. Ding and Z. Jia contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, F., Jia, Z. & Liu, M. National representation in the spine literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited spine journals. Eur Spine J 25, 850–855 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4204-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4204-7

Keywords

Navigation