Abstract
Purpose
Significant progress has been seen in the field of spine in recent years as a consequence of worldwide contributions. However, the national productivity to the field of spine is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the national contributions in the field of spine.
Methods
Web of Science was searched for articles published in the five highly cited spine journals from 2009 to 2013, including The Spine Journal, European Spine Journal, Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. The number of total articles, the per capita numbers, impact factors, citations and funding source were recorded and analyzed.
Results
A total number of 6920 articles were published in the five journals from 2009 to 2013 worldwide. North America, East Asia, and West Europe were the most productive world areas. High-income countries published 83.97 % of articles, middle-income 16.01 %, and lower-income just 0.01 %. The United States published the most number of articles (35.79 %), followed by China, Japan, South Korea, and Canada, and had the highest total impact factors and the highest total citations. However, when normalized to population size, Switzerland had the highest number of articles per million populations, followed by The Netherlands and Sweden.
Conclusions
The majority of the spine articles are published by authors from high-income countries while few publications from low-income countries. The United States is the most productive country in the field of spine. However, some European countries may be more productive when normalized to population size.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Langer A, Diaz-Olavarrieta C, Berdichevsky K, Villar J (2004) Why is research from developing countries underrepresented in international health literature, and what can be done about it? Bull World Health Organ 82(10):802–803
Bakker IS, Wevers KP, Hoekstra HJ (2013) Geographical distribution of publications in the scientific field of surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 108(8):505–507
Li Q, Jiang Y, Zhang M (2012) National representation in the emergency medicine literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. Am J Emerg Med 30(8):1530–1534
Bould MD, Boet S, Riem N, Kasanda C, Sossou A, Bruppacher HR (2010) National representation in the anaesthesia literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited anaesthesia journals. Anaesthesia 65(8):799–804
Zhang WJ, Ding W, Jiang H, Zhang YF, Zhang JL (2013) National representation in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. Ann Plast Surg 70(2):231–234
Li Z, Qiu LX, Wu FX, Yang LQ, Sun YM, Lu ZJ, Yu WF (2012) Assessing the national productivity in subspecialty critical care medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis. J Crit Care 27(6):747.e1–e5
Institute for Scientific Information (2014) ISI Journal Citation Reports 2013. http://isiknowledge.com. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
World Bank Data Development Group (2014) World Bank list of economies. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/countryand-lending-groups. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
Central Intelligence Agency (2014) The world factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
Lynch JR, Cunningham MR, Warme WJ, Schaad DC, Wolf FM, Leopold SS (2007) Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):1010–1018
Murray MR, Wang T, Schroeder GD, Hsu WK (2012) The 100 most cited spine articles. Eur Spine J 21(10):2059–2069
Saxena S, Paraje G, Sharan P, Karam G, Sadana R (2006) The 10/90 divide in mental health research: trends over a 10-year period. Br J Psychiatry 188:81–82
Jia Z, Ding F, Wu Y, He Q, Ruan D (2015) The 50 most-cited articles in orthopaedic surgery from mainland China. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(7):2423–2430
Tong D, Wang L, Jiang J (2013) Publications from China in The Lancet, NEJM, and JAMA. Lancet 381(9882):1983
Sreekar H, Dawre S, Lamba S, Gupta AK (2012) Trend of India’s Contribution to the Field of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Ann Plast Surg 69(2):223
Jia ZW, Wu YH, Li H, Li HF, Zhao XY, Tang Y, Yao CL, Zhao YC, Liu LG, Wang L, He Q, Ruan DK (2015) Growing trend of China’s contribution to the field of spine: a 10-year survey of the literature. Eur Spine J 24:1806–1812
Luo X, Liang Z, Gong F, Bao H, Huang L, Jia Z (2015) Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009-2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. J Foot Ankle Res 8:12
Liang Z, Luo X, Gong F, Bao H, Qian H, Jia Z, Li G (2015) Worldwide research productivity in the field of arthroscopy: a bibliometric analysis. Arthroscopy 31:1452–1457
Amiri AR, Kanesalingam K, Cro S, Casey AT (2014) Does source of funding and conflict of interest influence the outcome and quality of spinal research? Spine J 14(2):308–314
Errico T (2010) The promethean role of industry in spine surgery research. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(8):491–492
Acknowledgments
We thank many of our colleagues for their helps in collecting data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
F. Ding and Z. Jia contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, F., Jia, Z. & Liu, M. National representation in the spine literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited spine journals. Eur Spine J 25, 850–855 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4204-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4204-7