Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of the Italian version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score (mJOA-IT): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The modified Japanese orthopaedic association scale (mJOA) is considered one of the most appropriate outcome measures for the assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Moreover, mJOA has been recognised among the key predictors of surgical outcome at a global level. To apply the mJOA successfully at an international level, it should be translated and culturally adapted in the native language of the investigators using this scale. A translated version of the mJOA or any other functional scale has never been studied within an Italian population affected by CSM. The aim of this study has been to describe translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the mJOA (mJOA-IT).

Methods

The mJOA-IT was developed following a forward–backward translation procedure. Psychometric properties were assessed on a cohort of patients with CSM undergone anterior or posterior decompression associated with stabilisation in lordosis.

Results

The mJOA-IT proved to be a reliable outcome measure for CSM (internal consistency 0.60, test–retest stability 0.910, P < 0.001, inter-observer reliability 0.80, P < 0.001). The mJOA-IT was associated with the Nurick scale (r = −0.615) while it was not associated with NDI, SF-36 and SF-36 components. The mJOA-IT was also responsive (d = 0.867).

Conclusions

The mJOA-IT proved to be a reliable and valid tool to assess patients affected by CSM. This form is recommended to be used for clinical and research purposes in Italy, to promote the global standardisation of assessment tools and to compare studies on CSM worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG (2013) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 19:409–421. doi:10.1177/1073858412467377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Denaro V (1991) Stenosis of the cervical spine: causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Gross AR, Aker PD, Goldsmith CH, Peloso P (2000) Patient education for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev (Online):CD000962

  4. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14:409–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. BenDebba M, Heller J, Ducker TB, Eisinger JM (2002) Cervical spine outcomes questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties. Spine 27:2116–2123 (discussion 2124). doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000025729.35559.28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Zamora J, Gil Teresa, del Real M, Llobera J, Fernandez C, Bauza JR, Bauza K, Coll J, Cuadri M, Duro E, Gili J, Gestoso M, Gomez M, Gonzalez J, Ibanez P, Jover A, Lazaro P, Llinas M, Mateu C, Mufraggi N, Muriel A, Nicolau C, Olivera MA, Pascual P, Perello L, Pozo F, Revuelta T, Reyes V, Ribot S, Ripoll J, Ripoll J, Rodriguez E, Kovacs-Atencion Primaria G (2004) Correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with common low back pain. Spine 29:206–210. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000107235.47465.08

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T (1991) Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 4:286–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalsi-Ryan S, Singh A, Massicotte EM, Arnold PM, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Fehlings MG (2013) Ancillary outcome measures for assessment of individuals with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 38:S111–S122. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kopjar B, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Fehlings M (2015) Psychometric properties of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association scale in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 40:E23–E28. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tetreault LA, Cote P, Kopjar B, Arnold P, Fehlings MG, America AON, International Clinical Trial Research N (2015) A clinical prediction model to assess surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: internal and external validations using the prospective multicenter AOSpine North American and international datasets of 743 patients. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 15:388–397. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.12.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, Benzel EC, Fehlings MG, Guiot BH (2010) Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools. Neurosurgery 66:1013–1016. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000368391.79314.6F

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boni M, Cherubino P, Denaro V, Benazzo F (1984) Multiple subtotal somatectomy. Technique and evaluation of a series of 39 cases. Spine 9:358–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boni M, Denaro V (1982) Surgical treatment of cervical arthrosis. Follow-up review (2–13 years) of the 1st 100 cases operated on by anterior approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:269–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boni MDGL, Denaro V (1987) CT evaluation of the multiple subtotal somatectomy results. In: Kehr P, Weidner A (eds) Cervical Spine. Springer-Verlag, Vienna, pp 124–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh A, Crockard HA (2001) Comparison of seven different scales used to quantify severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and post-operative improvement. J Outcome Meas 5:798–818

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vernon H (2008) The neck disability index: state-of-the-art, 1991–2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 31:491–502. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vernon H (2008) The psychometric properties of the neck disability index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:1414–1415 (author reply 1415–1416). doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holly LT, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Heary RF, Kaiser MG, Mummaneni PV, Ryken TC, Choudhri TF, Vresilovic EJ, Resnick DK, Joint Section on Disorders of the S, Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological S, Congress of Neurological S (2009) Functional outcomes assessment for cervical degenerative disease. J Neurosurg Spine 11:238–244. doi:10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kopjar B (1996) The SF-36 health survey: a valid measure of changes in health status after injury. Inj Prev 2:135–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L (1992) Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 305:160–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Denaro L, D’Avella D, Denaro V (2010) Pitfalls in cervical spine surgery: avoidance and management of complications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52:281–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kraemer HC (1980) Extension of the kappa coefficient. Biometrics 36:207–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Monticone M, Ferrante S, Maggioni S, Grenat G, Checchia GA, Testa M, Teli MG, Mannion AF (2014) Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 23:863–872. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3092-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro Del Portillo, 200, Trigoria, 00128, Rome, Italy

    Umile Giuseppe Longo, Alessandra Berton, Giuseppe Salvatore & Vincenzo Denaro

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, University-Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani, 5, Padua, Italy

    Luca Denaro

Authors
  1. Umile Giuseppe Longo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessandra Berton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luca Denaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giuseppe Salvatore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vincenzo Denaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Berton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Longo, U.G., Berton, A., Denaro, L. et al. Development of the Italian version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score (mJOA-IT): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Eur Spine J 25, 2952–2957 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4512-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4512-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation