Abstract
Purpose
CT myelography has been used since 1976 to diagnose neural compression in the axial skeleton. With the advent of routine MRI, its role in accurately diagnosing neural compression has been questioned as its normal appearances are not defined in the study. In this study, we examine a series of CT myelograms to define the normal appearances of the neural elements of the spine.
Methods
The CT myelograms of patients with unilateral symptoms were examined by four independent physicians. The lateral extent of contrast was examined and recorded. Concordance between the recorded extents was assessed using kappa scores.
Results
Thirty-six scans were reviewed. Kappa analysis shows that there is a fair agreement in the lateral extent of contrast at L1, L3 and L4. At L2 and L5, agreement is slight.
Conclusion
The interpretation of CT myelography shows significant interobserver variability. As a result, the usefulness of this diagnostic tool can be questioned, and if misinterpreted, it could lead to questionable diagnoses and inadvertently erroneous management if used in isolation.
Graphic abstract
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Di Chiro G, Schellinger D (1976) Computed tomography of spinal cord after lumbar intrathecal introduction of metrizamide (computer-assisted myelography). Radiology 120:101–104. https://doi.org/10.1148/120.1.101
Kim JH, van Rijn RM, van Tulder MW, Koes BW, de Boer MR, Ginai AZ, Ostelo R, van der Windt D, Verhagen AP (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic imaging for lumbar disc herniation in adults with low back pain or sciatica is unknown; a systematic review. Chiropr Man Ther 26:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0207-x
Jackson RP, Becker GJ, Jacobs RR, Montesano PX, Cooper BR, McManus GE (1989) The neuroradiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus: I. A comparison of computed tomography (CT), myelography, CT-myelography, discography, and CT-discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:1356–1361
Gillstrom P, Ericsson K, Hindmarsh T (1986) A comparison of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 106:12–14
Bartynski WS, Lin L (2003) Lumbar root compression in the lateral recess: MR imaging, conventional myelography, and CT myelography comparison with surgical confirmation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:348–360
Bischoff RJ, Rodriguez RP, Gupta K, Righi A, Dalton JE, Whitecloud TS (1993) A comparison of computed tomography-myelography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography in the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus and spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6:289–295
Jackson RP, Cain JE Jr, Jacobs RR, Cooper BR, McManus GE (1989) The neuroradiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus: II. A comparison of computed tomography (CT), myelography, CT-myelography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:1362–1367
Fortin JD, Wheeler MT (2004) Imaging in lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Phys 7:133–139
Kretzschmar K (1998) Degenerative diseases of the spine. The role of myelography and myelo-CT. Eur J Radiol 27:229–234
Ozdoba C, Gralla J, Rieke A, Binggeli R, Schroth G (2011) Myelography in the age of mri: why we do it, and how we do it. Radiol Res Pract 2011:329017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/329017
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Penning L, Wilmink JT (1986) Specificity of CT myelographic findings in cervical nerve root symptoms. Neurosurg Rev 9:99–101
Amrhein TJ, Kranz PG (2019) Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: imaging in diagnosis and treatment. Radiol Clin North Am 57:439–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2018.10.004
McKay G, Torrie PA, Bertram W, Landham P, Morris S, Hutchinson J, Watura R, Harding I (2017) Myelography in the assessment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and its influence on surgical management. Korean J Spine 14:133–138. https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2017.14.4.133
Acknowledgements
Thanks go to Adrian Sayers for his invaluable assistance with statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Brett Rocos, David R S Evans, Brathaban Rajayogeswaran and M. John Hutchinson declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rocos, B., Evans, D.R.S., Rajayogeswaran, B. et al. The normal appearance of CT myelograms. Eur Spine J 29, 1087–1091 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06287-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06287-5