Original article
Biomechanical comparison of instrumentation techniques in treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a finite element analysis

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1341-zGet rights and content

Abstract

Background

There are several surgical techniques currently employed to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures, including anterior fixation, posterior fixation, or combined anterior-posterior fixation. Biomechanical analysis of the various types of surgical techniques is therefore critical to enable selection of the appropriate surgical method for successful spinal fusion. However, the effects of the various spinal fusion techniques on spinal stiffness have not been clearly defined, and the strengths and weaknesses of each fusion technique are still controversial.

Methods

The biomechanical effects of increasing the number of anterior rods and removing the mid-column in anterior fixation, posterior fixation, and combined anterior-posterior fixation on spinal stiffness in thoracolumbar burst fractures was investigated. Finite element analysis was used to investigate the effects of the three fusion methods on spine biomechanics because of its ability to control for variables related to the material and experimental environment.

Results

The stiffness of the fused spinal junction highly correlates with the selection of an additional posterior fixation. The mid-column decompression showed a significant change in stiffness, although the effect of decompression was much less than that with the application of posterior fixation and the anterior rod number. In addition, two-rod anterior fixation without additional posterior fixation is able to provide enough spinal stability; and one-rod anterior fixation with posterior fixation yields better results in regard to preventing excessive motion and ensuring spinal stability.

Conclusions

The present study shows that careful consideration is necessary when choosing the anterior rod number and applying posterior fixation and mid-column decompression during surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (46)

  • A biomechanical study of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior long segment fusion with vertebral body augmentation

    2021, Clinical Biomechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The lower parts of L5 were fixed to simulate the spine flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation motion (Elmasry et al., 2018; Park et al., 2015)(in Fig. 2). The material properties of each anatomical structure in the models were taken from literature as shown in Table 1 (Fan and Guo, 2018; Park et al., 2009; Ruberte et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2018). Six degrees of freedom of the L5 segment lowest surface were limited and corresponding symmetrical boundary conditions for flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation were set (Bess et al., 2017).

  • Finite Element Analysis of Short- Versus Long-Segment Posterior Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture

    2019, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Finally, the various portions of the model were combined to create a 3D FE model of a normal T9–L3 TL spine. The material properties used are given, including the elastic modulus and Poisson ratio, in Table 1.9,14-16 The models were assumed to be homogeneous, isotropic, and linearly elastic.

  • Computational Modeling of the Spine

    2016, Benzel's Spine Surgery: Techniques, Complication Avoidance and Management: Volume 1-2, Fourth Edition
  • Biomechanical effects of fusion levels on the risk of proximal junctional failure and kyphosis in lumbar spinal fusion surgery

    2015, Clinical Biomechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The FE model was developed to be symmetric across the mid-sagittal plane and comprised seven vertebrae, six intervertebral discs, and seven types of major ligaments. The material properties used in the model were obtained from previously published literature, and ligament attachment points were determined based on anatomical information (Goel et al., 1995; Guan et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2010; Lu et al., 1996; Natarajan and Andersson, 1999; Natarajan et al., 2000; Park et al., 2009; Rohlmann et al., 2006; Ruberte et al., 2009; Schmidt et al., 2006, 2007a,2007b, 2009; Shirazi-Adl et al., 1986; Ueno and Liu, 1987; Wagner and Lotz, 2004). The FE models of spinal bones included the cortical (Young's modulus (E) = 12,000 MPa, Poisson's ration (ν) = 0.3), cancellous (E = 100 MPa, ν = 0.2), and post bones (E = 3500 MPa, ν = 0.24) using linear elastic solid elements.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text