Abstract
Background
In total brachial plexus injury, intercostal nerves (ICNs) are used as donor nerves to restore the elbow flexion; albeit in upper brachial plexus injury (BPI), ulnar nerve provides a source of motor axons for this purpose. The present study set out to compare the restoration of elbow flexion by using these two donor nerves.
Methods
Between 2010 and 2013, 24 adult patients with upper-middle BPI and 15 patients with total BPI undergoing elbow flexion restoration surgery were studied. Motor fascicle of flexor carpi ulnaris branch of ulnar nerve (mFCU nerve) procedure was utilized in upper-middle BPI, as well as transfer of ICN to biceps branch of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) in total BPI. Both techniques included sectioning, rerouting, and direct suturing of the biceps branch of the MCN. Follow-up consisted serial clinical examinations and EMG–NCV tests. Motor strength was recorded according to the British Medical Research Council grading system in that the results were reported as nonfunctional (grades M0–M2) and functional (grades M3–M5).
Result
No significant difference was documented between the Oberlin procedure and ICN–MCN transfer in terms of reinnervation results (P = 0.6). However, a significant difference in restoration of muscle force was found between the mFCU (95.83%) and ICN–MCN transfers (66.66%) (P = 0.02).
Conclusion
The evidence from the present study indicates that although ICN–MCN transfer is a viable method for reanimation of elbow flexion in BPI, mFCU nerve is a better donor if exists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhardwaj P, Bhardwaj N (2009) Motor grading of elbow flexion—is Medical Research Council grading good enough? J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Injury 4:3
Chuang DC, Yeh MC, Wei FC (1992) Intercostal nerve transfer of the musculocutaneous nerve in avulsed brachial plexus injuries: evaluation of 66 patients. J Hand Surgery 17:822–828
Coulet B, Boretto JG, Lazerges C, Chammas M (2010) A comparison of intercostal and partial ulnar nerve transfers in restoring elbow flexion following upper brachial plexus injury (C5 − C6 ± C7). J Hand Surg 35:1297–1303
de Sousa AC, Guedes-Correa JF (2016) Post-Oberlin procedure cortical neuroplasticity in traumatic injury of the upper brachial plexus. Radiol Bras 49:201–202
Emamhadi M, Alijani B, Andalib S (2016) Long-term clinical outcomes of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve in patients with brachial plexus palsy. Acta Neurochir 158:1801–1806
Emamhadi M, Andalib S (2018) The first experience of triple nerve transfer in proximal radial nerve palsy. World Neurosurg 109:351–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.033
Flores LP (2011) Brachial plexus surgery: the role of the surgical technique for improvement of the functional outcome. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 69:660–665
Frey M (2000) Avulsion injuries to the brachial plexus and the value of motor reinnervation by ipsilateral nerve transfer. SAGE Publications, London
Kakinoki R, Ikeguchi R, Dunkan SF, Nakayama K, Matsumoto T, Ohta S, Nakamura T (2010) Comparison between partial ulnar and intercostal nerve transfers for reconstructing elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Injury 5:4
Merrell GA, Barrie KA, Katz DL, Wolfe SW (2001) Results of nerve transfer techniques for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature. J Hand Surg 26:303–314
Moran SL, Steinmann SP, Shin AY (2005) Adult brachial plexus injuries: mechanism, patterns of injury, and physical diagnosis. Hand Clin 21:13–24
Nagano A, Ochiai N, Okinaga S (1992) Restoration of elbow flexion in root lesions of brachial plexus injuries. J Hand Surg 17:815–821
Nagano A, Yamamoto S, Mikami Y (1995) Intercostal nerve transfer to restore upper extremity functions after brachial plexus injury. Ann Acad Med Singap 24:42–45
Narakas AO, Hentz VR (1988) Neurotization in brachial plexus injuries. Indication and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 237:43–56
Oberlin C, Ameur NE, Teboul F, Beaulieu J-Y, Vacher C (2002) Restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injury by transfer of ulnar nerve fascicles to the nerve to the biceps muscle. Tech Hand Upper Extrem Surg 6:86–90
Oberlin C, Beal D, Leechavengvongs S, Salon A, Dauge MC, Sarcy JJ (1994) Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5–C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: anatomical study and report of four cases. J Hand Surg 19:232–237
Pondaag W, Malessy MJA (2014) Intercostal and pectoral nerve transfers to re-innervate the biceps muscle in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Hand Surg (Eur Vol) 39:647–652
Ruch DS, Friedman A, Nunley JA (1995) The restoration of elbow flexion with intercostal nerve transfers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 314:95–103
Russell T (1999) Surgical disorders of the peripheral nerves. R. Birch, G. Bonney, CB Wynn Parry. 283 × 223 mm. Pp. 539. Illustrated. 1998. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. Br J Surg 86:429
Seddon HJ (1963) Nerve grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Br 45:447–461
Teboul F, Kakkar R, Ameur N, Beaulieu J-Y, Oberlin C (2004) Transfer of fascicles from the ulnar nerve to the nerve to the biceps in the treatment of upper brachial plexus palsy. JBJS 86:1485–1490
Tsuyama NHT (1968) Reconstructive surgery for traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Clin Orthop 3:675–687
Tung TH, Mackinnon SE (2010) Nerve transfers: indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Hand Surg 35:332–341
Wagner E, Hundepool CA, Kircher M, Spinner R, Bishop A, Shin AY (2015) Intercostal nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion: level 4 evidence. J Hand Surg 40:e12
Xiao C, Lao J, Wang T, Zhao X, Liu J, Gu Y (2014) Intercostal nerve transfer to neurotize the musculocutaneous nerve after traumatic brachial plexus avulsion: a comparison of two, three, and four nerve transfers. J Reconstr Microsurg 30:297–304
Acknowledgements
The research was financially supported by Guilan University of Medical Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Guilan University of Medical Sciences) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1 (WMV 3489 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Emamhadi, M., Behzadnia, H., Zamanidoust, M. et al. Intercostal or ulnar nerve: Which donor nerve is to be used for reanimation of elbow flexion?. Musculoskelet Surg 105, 183–188 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-020-00653-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-020-00653-z