Chapter 35 - Spinal stenosis
Section snippets
Definition of spinal stenosis
Spinal stenosis refers to the narrowing of the spinal canal causing clinical symptoms secondary to spinal cord or radicular compromise. A distinction must be made between anatomic findings and clinical symptoms, since an anatomically narrow canal is often asymptomatic (Postacchini, 1996). Spinal stenosis can involve the cervical, thoracic (rarely), or lumbar spine, being either monosegmental or multisegmental (adjacent or not), and unilateral or bilateral.
Cervical or thoracic spinal stenosis
History
The first description of a narrowed spinal canal was made by Portal in the early 19th century. Dejerine used the expression “neurogenic claudication” in 1911. This clinical diagnosis was later ascribed to spinal canal stenosis by von Gelderen and Verbiest. Brain identified the clinical picture of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) in the 1950s, and in the 1970s, Kirkaldy-Willis proposed a physiopathologic frame for the understanding of spinal stenosis development (Kirkaldy-Willis et al., 1978
Classification
Spinal stenosis may be classified according to its etiology or anatomy. The latter refers to either central canal, lateral recess or foraminal stenosis.
Arnoldi considered two types of spinal stenosis from an etiologic point of view: congenital or, more frequently, acquired (Arnoldi et al., 1976).
Congenital stenosis may be idiopathic or may be caused by achondroplasia, being characterized by the presence of short and thick pedicles that render the central canal stenotic in its sagittal diameter
Epidemiology
Lumbar spinal stenosis incidence is fourfold higher than cervical stenosis, amounting to five cases per 100 000 individuals (Johnsson, 1995). Cervical and lumbar stenosis coexist in 5% of patients (Epstein et al., 1984).
Up to 14% of patients seeking specialist care for low back pain have spinal stenosis (Hart et al., 1995).
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in patients older than 50 years (Berhardt et al., 1993).
Some degree of stenosis is present
Narrowing and stenosis
Degenerative disk disease is considered the primum movens of spinal stenosis, being most frequent at the L4–5 level, followed by L3–4, L5–S1, and L1–2 (Epstein, 1998). Kirkaldy-Willis et al., 1974, Kirkaldy-Willis et al., 1978, Kirkaldy-Willis et al., 1982 described the synergistic effects of different degenerative changes causing stenosis of the spinal canal.
Disk degeneration leads to ventral compression by disc protrusion. Loss of disc height is another consequence of degeneration (Fig. 35.1
Diagnosis
The diagnosis of spinal stenosis is based on the patient’s history and is confirmed by imaging studies. The physical examination is often unremarkable in lumbar stenosis (Katz and Harris, 2008). Neurophysiologic studies may be of help to confirm a coexisting pathology or to aid in the differential diagnosis, particularly with polyneuropathies of various causes (Amundsen et al., 1995). The clinical presentation might not be straightforward in the minority of patients with both cervical and
Management
Knowledge of the natural history of the disease is of paramount importance in determining the most appropriate therapeutic course. Since significant spontaneous improvement is unlikely, intolerable symptoms warrant a more aggressive strategy. Progressive disease is to be expected for both cervical and lumbar stenosis, probably more dramatically in the former (Fouyas et al., 2002), therefore the goal of management should be primarily to halt progression. In the case of lumbar stenosis patients,
Outcome
Two randomized trials comparing the efficacy of decompressive laminectomy with that of nonoperative therapy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis found patients assigned to surgery to have significantly greater improvement in leg and back pain at 1 year and 2 years, although the differences abate with time (Malmivaara et al., 2007, Weinstein, 2008). Two-thirds of patients report to have benefited from the operation (Malmivaara et al., 2007, Weinstein, 2008). Patients with a pronounced
Conclusions
The prevalence of degenerative diseases such as spinal stenosis is likely to increase due to the aging population. The heightened awareness and demand for quality of life will also lead to a future increase in the need for treatment of spinal stenosis.
Until recently there were no clear data to guide conservative versus operative management for this condition. Regarding lumbar spinal stenosis, there is now class 1b evidence that surgery is of benefit in the short term. The best management for
References (51)
- et al.
Increased MRI signal intensity in association with myelopathy and cervical instability: case report and review of literature
Surg Neurol
(2000) The imaging of lumbar spinal stenosis
Clin Radiol
(2000)- et al.
Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features
Spine
(1995) - et al.
Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(1976) - et al.
Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study
Spine
(2005) - et al.
Laser Doppler study of porcine cauda equina blood flow. The effect of electrical stimulation of the rootlets during single and double site, low pressure compression of the cauda equina
Spine
(1995) - et al.
Analysis of cervical spine curvature in cervical spondylosis
Neurosurgery
(1988) - et al.
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy
J Bone Joint Surg
(1993) - et al.
Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1990) - et al.
The pathophysiology of cervical spondylosis and myelopathy
Spine
(1988)
Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis
J Neurosurg
Evaluation of circulatory compromise in the leg in lumbar spinal canal stenosis
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Pathophysiology and treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
Clin Neurosurg
Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitc myelopathy
J Neurosurg
Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of cauda equina involvement by electrophysiological recordings
J Neurol
Significance of the small spinal lumbar canal
J Neurosurg
Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis
Surg Neurol
Coexisting cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnosis and management
Neurosurgery
Cochrane review on the role of surgery in cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy
Spine
The utility of dynamic flexion-extension radiographs in the initial evaluation of the degenerative lumbar spine
Spine
Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey
Spine
The predictive value of preoperative myelography in lumbar spinal stenosis
Spine
Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987–1999
Eur Spine J
Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain
N Engl J Med
Lumbar spinal stenosis. A retrospective study of 163 cases in southern Sweden
Acta Orthop Scand
Cited by (81)
Optimal path, orientation and trajectory planning along arbitrarily shaped surfaces for image-based robot-automated medical procedures
2023, Control Engineering Practice