Online-only article
Major article
Using electronic medical records to increase the efficiency of catheter-associated urinary tract infection surveillance for National Health and Safety Network reporting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.005Get rights and content

Background

Streamlining health care–associated infection surveillance is essential for health care facilities owing to the continuing increases in reporting requirements.

Methods

Stanford Hospital, a 583-bed adult tertiary care center, used their electronic medical record (EMR) to develop an electronic algorithm to reduce the time required to conduct catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) surveillance in adults. The algorithm provides inclusion and exclusion criteria, using the National Healthcare Safety Network definitions, for patients with a CAUTI. The algorithm was validated by trained infection preventionists through complete chart review for a random sample of cultures collected during the study period, September 1, 2012, to February 28, 2013.

Results

During the study period, a total of 6,379 positive urine cultures were identified. The Stanford Hospital electronic CAUTI algorithm identified 6,101 of these positive cultures (95.64%) as not a CAUTI, 191 (2.99%) as a possible CAUTI requiring further validation, and 87 (1.36%) as a definite CAUTI. Overall, use of the algorithm reduced CAUTI surveillance requirements at Stanford Hospital by 97.01%.

Conclusions

The electronic algorithm proved effective in increasing the efficiency of CAUTI surveillance. The data suggest that CAUTI surveillance using the National Healthcare Safety Network definitions can be fully automated.

Section snippets

Methods

Stanford Hospital, a 583-bed tertiary care center, assigned a multidisciplinary team of front-line providers, infection preventionists, and clinical informaticists to create an automated electronic algorithm and data reporting system to increase the efficiency of CAUTI surveillance and reporting. Using the CDC definitions published in January 2013,12 the team designed an algorithm that provides inclusion and exclusion criteria for patients meeting the criteria for a CAUTI. The team visually

Results

Using the SHECA, we retrospectively analyzed all positive urine cultures collected at Stanford Hospital between September 1, 2012, and February 28, 2013. During this period, 6,379 positive urine cultures were recorded; of these, the SHECA identified 6,101 (95.64%) as not a CAUTI because the positive culture did not meet the NHSN criteria; 191 (2.99%) as a possible CAUTI because there were insufficient data to verify whether the culture was or was not a CAUTI; and 87 (1.36%) as a definite CAUTI (

Discussion

Infection prevention surveillance is a very time-consuming and resource-intensive process. It is estimated that 45% of infection preventionists' time is spent on surveillance and analysis.13 With the ever-increasing reporting requirements for infection prevention departments2, 14, 15 comes the need to maximize the efficiency of surveillance and analysis. As a result of the mass adoption of EMRs in recent years, hospitals now have the ability to leverage their data to increase the efficiency of

Conclusion

Our study suggests that health care facilities, regardless of the EMR in use, available data, or available funds, can effectively leverage their current EMR infrastructure by investing in low-cost solutions to greatly increase the efficiency and effectiveness of HAI surveillance. The health care environment is requiring hospitals to reduce costs and improve quality; infection prevention departments are focused on achieving both. However, growing surveillance requirements hinders infection

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (18)

  • Identification of postoperative complications using electronic health record data and machine learning

    2020, American Journal of Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although the NSQIP data are considered to be of high quality, the data collection methods greatly limit the number of patients who can be assessed (∼15% of those patients undergoing surgery at most large hospitals) because the process is time-consuming and costly, and participating hospitals must pay to participate. There is a large literature regarding the use of statistical models applied to the electronic health record (EHR) to identify surgical complications: surgical site infections,1–4 urinary tract infections,5–15 sepsis,16 bleeding,17,18 and any type of complication.19–21 Most work on the identification of postoperative complications using EHR data has used structured data for the identification of specific types of complications, but because of the chosen statistical models for these analyses, the authors only explored a small number of explanatory variables.1,2,22,23

  • Identification of urinary tract infections using electronic health record data

    2019, American Journal of Infection Control
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although we did not include catheterization in our final model reported in Table 3, we suggest including it when applying similar methodology to different UTI datasets, especially given the continued high risk of CAUTIs reported in the literature.5,18-20 However, as we pointed out in the introduction, catheter identification from EHR data can be difficult,2,5-8,21-23 and it was not clear whether the EHR data used in this study properly captured the catheter variable. It is also important to point out that we were not specifically looking for CAUTIs in this analysis.

  • Detecting the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter and urinary symptoms in hospitalized patients using natural language processing

    2017, Journal of Biomedical Informatics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Attempts at automating the surveillance process for detecting infections have had mixed success as the data required to make the inference usually reside in disparate hospital information systems and are not always amenable to mining [5]. There have been attempts to automate the detection of CAUTI, also with mixed success [6–9]. The most important data element is the presence of an IUC in the patient and, arguably, this is the most challenging to determine using available medical records.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was funded through hospital quality improvement initiatives.

Conflict of interest: None to report.

View full text