The effect of sleep restriction on laser evoked potentials, thermal sensory and pain thresholds and suprathreshold pain in healthy subjects
Introduction
Although a nociceptive effect of sleep restriction was demonstrated in an experimental study as early as 1934 (Cooperman et al., 1934), there are still uncertainties about the nature of this relationship (Azevedo et al., 2011, Haack and Mullington, 2005, Kundermann et al., 2008, Kundermann et al., 2004, Onen et al., 2001, Roehrs et al., 2006, Schuh-Hofer et al., 2013, Smith et al., 2007, Smith et al., 2005, Tiede et al., 2010). From previous studies it seems that sleep restriction enhances our subjective experience of pain, including reduced pain thresholds, but reduce the brain’s reaction to pain as demonstrated by laser evoked potential (LEP) amplitudes (Azevedo et al., 2011, Tiede et al., 2010).
However, because these studies have considerable methodological variations, e.g. regarding the type of sleep restriction, it is difficult to explain the neurophysiological mechanism behind this apparently contradictory observation. By extending the LEP- and pain thresholds protocol with paradigms reflecting responses to prolonged pain, i.e. also measuring LEP-habituation and temporal summation of suprathreshold heat pain, we might detect sleep restriction-typical patterns. Such patterns might shed more light on the physiology behind the effects of sleep restriction on pain.
Suprathreshold pain paradigms may reflect temporal summation of pain, and give information about central mechanisms of pain hypersensitivity (Granot et al., 2006). Only a few studies have evaluated the effect of sleep restriction on suprathreshold pain and with varying methods, e.g. to a fixed-intensity laser stimulus (Azevedo et al., 2011, Tiede et al., 2010), as pain score to a cold-pressor conditioning stimulus (Smith et al., 2007), as a heat pain tolerance threshold (Onen et al., 2001) or as a pain score to consecutive pin-pricks for wind-up evaluation (Schuh-Hofer et al., 2013). Generally, results suggest that sleep restriction also might cause suprathreshold hyperalgesia. Since generalized (multi-site) hyperalgesia often suggest central mechanisms of pain hypersensitivity, we used two sites (cephalic and upper extremity) for suprathreshold and for pain threshold determination.
Since habituation is a physiological mechanism that protects individuals from responding to repeated stimuli of moderate magnitude and low significance (Coppola et al., 2013), it is interesting that abnormally decreased LEP-habituation has been described in several painful conditions like migraine (Di Clemente et al., 2013, Valeriani et al., 2003) and fibromyalgia (de Tommaso et al., 2014). Furthermore, as epidemiological studies indicate that there is a causal relationship between insomnia and several painful disorders (Boardman et al., 2006, Canivet et al., 2008, Gupta et al., 2007, Hoogendoorn et al., 2001, Kaila-Kangas et al., 2006, Lyngberg et al., 2005, Odegard et al., 2011, Siivola et al., 2004), it would be interesting to find out whether these two observations are related or not. Specifically, if lack of sleep in healthy individuals result in LEP-habituation abnormalities, it might indicate that sleep loss could be the explanatory mechanism for the observed decreased LEP-habituation in migraine and fibromyalgia. As far as we know, no previous study has investigated the effect of sleep restriction on LEP-amplitude habituation.
As we aimed to compare psychophysical pain thresholds with pain-related CNS-responses, most specifically elicited with laser-induced skin heating, the thermal modality was deemed most suitable. This approach is in line with recent interest in more naturalistic sleep restriction-protocols (Finan et al., 2013). As such, a main aim was to investigate how two nights with sleep restriction affected LEP-amplitude and LEP-habituation. A second major aim was to study how sleep restriction affected thermal pain thresholds and suprathreshold heat pain responses. Thermal detection thresholds were also included as control variables to check for unspecific effects of sleep restriction on the somatosensory system, e.g. related to alertness or attention. Hence, it was also a third general aim to compare several variables, reflecting different aspects of thermal pain and sensory physiology, to explore possible sleep restriction-specific abnormality-patterns.
Section snippets
Study participants
Study participants were recruited through intranet advertisement within our Hospital and University. The study participants were ⩾18 years old, free of migraine or frequent (⩾3 days/month) tension type headache and otherwise healthy (except mild asthma and allergies). Subjects using drugs that could affect neurological, vascular or muscular function, having any history of alcohol or drug abuse, being pregnant or breastfeeding were not included.
From the 80 subjects who responded to the study
Characteristics of the study subjects
There were no group differences regarding gender, age, height, BMI, insomnia, sleep length, breathing difficulty, sleepiness or sleep quality (Table 1).
The effect of sleep restriction on sleep-variables
Subjects randomized to four hours sleep slept on average 3.9 h per night during the study, while subjects randomized to nine hours sleep slept on average 7.4 h per night (Table 1). Tiredness after the final test was increased in the four hours group (Table 1). None of the study subjects had an AHI ⩾5, and there was no difference in mean AHI or
Discussion
In this neurophysiological study on healthy young adults, sleep restriction was associated with decreased N2P2-amplitude, while no change in amplitude was observed in the group randomized to nine hours sleep. It should be noted that there was a significant difference in N2P2-amplitude between the four hours sleep group and the nine hours sleep at baseline as well. Since subjects were randomized, the group difference at baseline is interpreted as a random difference. Importantly, the differences
Acknowledgements
The authors are most grateful to the subjects of the present study for their participation. Conflict of interests: None.
References (55)
- et al.
The effects of total and REM sleep deprivation on laser-evoked potential threshold and pain perception
Pain
(2011) - et al.
Diurnal time course of heat pain perception in healthy humans
Neurosci Lett
(2011) - et al.
Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials
Clin Neurophysiol
(2008) - et al.
The association of sleep and pain: an update and a path forward
J Pain
(2013) - et al.
Brain generators of laser-evoked potentials: from dipoles to functional significance
Neurophysiol Clin
(2003) - et al.
Contact heat-evoked temporal summation: tonic versus repetitive-phasic stimulation
Pain
(2006) - et al.
Determinants of endogenous analgesia magnitude in a diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) paradigm: do conditioning stimulus painfulness, gender and personality variables matter?
Pain
(2008) - et al.
Sustained sleep restriction reduces emotional and physical well-being
Pain
(2005) - et al.
Reproducibility and influence of test modality order on thermal perception and thermal pain thresholds in quantitative sensory testing
Clin Neurophysiol
(2010) - et al.
Simultaneous recording of laser-evoked brain potentials and continuous, high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging in humans
Neuroimage
(2005)
Validation of the Karolinska sleepiness scale against performance and EEG variables
Clin Neurophysiol
Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials
Pain
Contribution of attentional and cognitive factors to laser evoked brain potentials
Neurophysiol Clin
One night of total sleep deprivation promotes a state of generalized hyperalgesia: a surrogate pain model to study the relationship of insomnia and pain
Pain
How do sleep disturbance and chronic pain inter-relate? Insights from the longitudinal and cognitive-behavioral clinical trials literature
Sleep Med Rev
Sleep restriction attenuates amplitudes and attentional modulation of pain-related evoked potentials, but augments pain ratings in healthy volunteers
Pain
Reduced habituation to experimental pain in migraine patients: a CO(2) laser evoked potential study
Pain
Disturbed sleep in shift workers, day workers, and insomniacs
Chronobiol Int
Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. The report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine task force
Sleep
Laser-evoked potentials are graded and somatotopically organized anteroposteriorly in the operculoinsular cortex of anesthetized monkeys
J Neurophysiol
Reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Epworth sleepiness scale
Sleep Breath
The natural history of headache: predictors of onset and recovery
Cephalalgia
Sleeping problems as a risk factor for subsequent musculoskeletal pain and the role of job strain: results from a one-year follow-up of the Malmo Shoulder Neck Study Cohort
Int J Behav Med
The acute effects of alcohol on sleep architecture in late adolescence
Alcohol Clin Exp Res
Studies on the physiology of sleep: XI. Further observations on the effects of prolonged sleeplessness
Am J Physiol
Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches
J Headache Pain
Update on laser-evoked potential findings in fibromyalgia patients in light of clinical and skin biopsy features
J Neurol
Cited by (39)
The differential effects of sleep deprivation on pain perception in individuals with or without chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2022, Sleep Medicine ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The methodological quality of the included RCTs and randomized crossover studies are summarized in Figs. S1a and S1b. Six of the seven included RCTs had high risk of bias [35,41,43,45,51,53], and one had moderate risk of bias [39]. The included randomized crossover trials had high (n = 6) [12,13,46,48,50,55] and moderate (n = 5) [16,37,38,44,52] risk of bias.
Is low intensity exercise sufficient to induce exercise-induced pain threshold modulation in people with persistent pain?
2022, Musculoskeletal Science and PracticeCitation Excerpt :Further, heightened psychological distress, such as pain catastrophising, stress, anxiety or depression potentially influences EIH, although evidence for this is inconclusive (Munneke et al., 2020). Poor sleep quality may influence EIH as sleep disruption reduces pain thresholds and pain inhibition (Ødegård et al., 2015; Simpson et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2007) and by extension may impair EIH; however, limited data prevents firm conclusions (Travers et al., 2018), and further investigation is warranted. This study aimed to: (1) investigate whether a 12-min walk test (12MWT) was sufficient to yield exercise-induced pain threshold modulation (EIPM) within two cohorts with persistent pain; (2) compare exercise-induced responses between these two cohorts (tertiary vs. community); (3) investigate whether baseline self-report measures (pain severity, pain distribution, psychological distress, sleep) and baseline pain sensitivity differed between EIPM response categories following the 12MWT.
Mechanisms and Pathways of Pain Photobiomodulation: A Narrative Review
2021, Journal of PainCitation Excerpt :Aberrant light exposure at night causes disruptions in the circadian rhythm by modulation of the melatonin signaling system which ultimately disrupts sleep.7 These disruptions in the diurnal sleep schedule have been shown to increase pain perception, as seen in night-shift workers.52,71,80,86,97 Although the mechanism has not been fully elucidated, there are some animal studies that might provide a mechanistic explanation.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral sleep interventions for adolescents and emerging adults
2020, Sleep Medicine ReviewsCitation Excerpt :One of the trials included naps in the protocol for the sleep restriction group [33], and inconsistency or omission in the reports of recovery sleep after intervention. Overall, it was feasible for both adolescents and emerging adults to follow the sleep restriction protocol (>80%) [21,30–34]. The sleep restriction interventions had a negative effect on positive and negative mood [31], preservation of slow wave sleep, and memory consolidation in recovery sleep [34]; they also led to a poorer working memory, executive function, and sustained attention [21], and more subjective sleepiness despite naps [33].