Clinical StudyOutpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis
Introduction
First described by Smith, Robinson and Cloward in 1958, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has become increasingly common treatment for cervical spine pathology [1], [2], [3]. Cost-saving strategies for surgical care have increased in popularity due to the unsustainable growth in healthcare costs, particularly the 7% of the United States gross domestic product (GDP) comprised by surgical care alone [4].
As a result of such strategies, ACDF performed on an outpatient basis has increased in popularity, since outpatient surgeries cost approximately 30% less than comparable inpatient procedures [5], [4]. Nearly all outpatient ACDF patient reports have originated from single-center studies, with the procedure yet to be addressed via a meta-analysis of the peer-reviewed literature [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. The rise of outpatient ACDF provides an ideal opportunity for a meta-analysis.
Section snippets
Methods
The Entrez gateway of the PubMed database was used to conduct a comprehensive literature search for articles published in English up to 3/9/16. Following this search, bibliographies from selected studies were subsequently culled for acquisition of additional pertinent articles. The inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis was as follows: (a) Minimum of 25 outpatient ACDF patients reported, (b) Data source not duplicative with a more voluminous published study, (c) Providing Oxford Center for
Results
The initial literature and bibliography search yielded a total of 13 studies examining outpatient ACDF [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] (Table 1). Of these studies, six failed to meet inclusion criteria; five failed to include an inpatient ACDF control group for comparison, while a sixth relied upon data used in a larger published study [12] (Table 2).
The seven studies meeting inclusion criteria encompassed a 21-year timespan from 1996 to 2016, and yielded a total of 2448 outpatient ACDF
Discussion
The majority of studies involving outpatient ACDF have originated from single institutions. Given that the cost advantages of outpatient surgery have resulted in increasing popularity of outpatient ACDF, this meta-analysis was performed in order to provide a more general examination.
The results from this meta-analysis comprising nearly 2500 outpatient ACDF patients are striking. Although the first outpatient ACDF series was published more than two decades ago, more than 95% of patients have
Conclusions
Outpatient ACDF has become increasingly popular, with more than 95% of patients represented by studies published since 2011. Nearly two-thirds of outpatient ACDFs underwent single-level fusion, with virtually none undergoing 3+ level ACDF. Outpatient ACDF is safe, with a low readmission rate and complication rates comparable to those associated with inpatient ACDF. These findings support an argument for increasing ACDFs performed on an outpatient basis in appropriately selected patients.
Conflicts of Interest/Disclosures
The authors declare that they have no financial or other conflicts of interest in relation to this research and its publication.
References (18)
- et al.
Anterior cervical decompression and fusion with plate fixation as an outpatient procedure
Spine J
(2005) - et al.
Feasibility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as an outpatient procedure
World Neurosurg
(2011) - et al.
The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Spine J
(2007) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks
J Neurosurg
(1958)- et al.
National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2010) - et al.
The treatment of certain cervical spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1958) - et al.
Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2009) - et al.
Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database
Neurosurg Focus
(2015) - et al.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases
J Neurosurg Spine
(2016)
Cited by (59)
Growing utilization of ambulatory spine surgery in Medicare patients from 2010–2021
2024, North American Spine Society JournalImpact of age within younger populations on outcomes following cervical surgery in the ambulatory setting
2022, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and TraumaIncrease in surgeons performing outpatient anterior cervical spine surgery leads to a shift in case volumes over time
2022, North American Spine Society JournalCitation Excerpt :Nonetheless, recent studies show that utilization rates for outpatient anterior cervical surgery continue to increase [14–16]. A number of studies conducted over the past decade have demonstrated that following careful patient selection, outpatient anterior cervical surgery can be performed with similar outcomes and morbidity relative to the inpatient setting [17–23]. Thus, the observed increase in outpatient volume may stem from more surgeons performing this procedure in the outpatient setting after being convinced by the findings of these studies.