Elsevier

The Spine Journal

Volume 10, Issue 11, November 2010, Pages 979-986
The Spine Journal

Clinical Study
Predictors and prevalence of patients undergoing additional kyphoplasty procedures after an initial kyphoplasty procedure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.027Get rights and content

Abstract

Background context

Vertebral cement augmentation, including kyphoplasty, has been shown to be a successful treatment for pain relief for vertebral compression fracture (VCF). Patients can sustain additional symptomatic VCFs that may require additional surgical intervention.

Purpose

To examine the prevalence and predictors of patients who sustain additional symptomatic VCFs that were treated with kyphoplasty.

Study design

A retrospective review of patients who previously underwent kyphoplasty for VCFs and had additional VCFs that were treated with kyphoplasty.

Patient sample

A total of 256 patients underwent kyphoplasty for VCFs from 2000 to 2007 at a single medical center.

Outcome measures

The outcome measure of interest was the need for an additional kyphoplasty procedure for a symptomatic VCF.

Methods

Risk factors such as age, sex, smoking status, and steroid use were assessed, as well as bisphosphonate use. Sagittal spinal alignment via Cobb angles for thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar regions was assessed.

Results

About 22.2% of the patients had an additional symptomatic VCF that was treated with a kyphoplasty procedure. Steroid use was the only significant risk factor for predicting patients with additional symptomatic VCFs who underwent additional kyphoplasty. The average time to the second VCF was 33 days. Adjacent-level VCFs were most common in the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine. Bisphosphonate use was not shown to be protective of preventing additional VCFs during this follow-up period.

Conclusion

This is the first single-center review of a large cohort of patients who underwent additional-level kyphoplasty for symptomatic VCFs after an index kyphoplasty procedure. Our results suggest that patients with a VCF who use chronic oral steroids should be carefully monitored for the presence of additional symptomatic VCFs that may need surgical intervention. Patients with prior thoracic VCFs who have additional back pain should be reevaluated for a possible adjacent-level fracture.

Introduction

Evidence & Methods

Additional compression fractures following vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty commonly occur. Some of these may be treated with vertebral augmentation. This article assesses possible risk factors that may predict augmentation procedures.

The authors found that 22% of patients had additional compression fractures that were treated with kyphoplasty. Steroid use was found to be a risk, but other common sources of osteoporosis were not.

The fact that nearly a quarter of the patients had additional procedures is an important benchmark. Other questions remain: how many patients had additional fractures that were not treated with kyphoplasty? Would a baseline bone mineral density assessment have been the greatest determinant of risk? Was the study underpowered to detect minor predictors? And what impact did surgical decision making (choosing or being told to undergo kyphoplasty) have on the observed future events?

—The Editors

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are estimated to affect 44 million Americans each year with an annual health-care cost of 440 million dollars [1], [2]. The morbidity of VCFs is well documented and includes back pain, decreased ambulation, prolonged bed rest, decreased pulmonary function, and decreased ability to live independently [2], [3]. Risk factors for VCFs include steroid use, prior VCF, smoking, female gender, and local kyphosis [4], [5], [6].

Several reports have shown that patients with symptomatic VCFs can benefit with respect to pain relief and functional improvement with minimally invasive procedures such as kyphoplasty [7], [8]. However, up to 50% of patients can experience further VCFs, usually at levels adjacent to prior fractures [9], [10].

To date, no study has adequately evaluated the prevalence of additional symptomatic VCFs in a large cohort of patients after kyphoplasty procedures. Furthermore, there is limited documentation about important risk factors, such as the specific vertebral levels involved or correlation with the sagittal spinal alignment in patients who develop additional VCFs after kyphoplasty.

Our hypothesis is that medications that decrease the strength of the vertebral body or residual sagittal spinal malalignment (thoracic kyphosis and/or loss of lumbar lordosis) would predispose patients to additional symptomatic VCFs. Other factors, such as bisphosphonate use, are hypothesized to be negative risk factors for additional symptomatic VCFs. This study sought to assess the impact of these predictive factors on the rate of additional VCFs in a large population of patients undergoing kyphoplasty for their initial fracture.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective review of 510 patients who sustained symptomatic fractures that underwent kyphoplasty procedures for osteoporotic compression fractures at a single institution from 2000 to 2007. Institutional review board approval was obtained before initiation of the study. All patients included in the study had a 1-year period of follow-up after their initial procedure, and their medical charts were thoroughly reviewed.

The location of the study was a Level 2 medical center that

Results

A total of 510 patients underwent vertebral augmentation at this study location from 2000 to 2007. Of these, 315 patients underwent kyphoplasty procedures. Fifty-nine patients were excluded either because of tumor (35 of 59, 60%), prior posterior spinal fusion (16 of 59, 27%), coronal deformity >10° (5 of 50, 8%), and high-energy trauma (3 of 59, 5%). Thus, a total of 256 (193 female and 63 male) patients were analyzed for this study. The mean age of study subjects was 79.5 years. Fifty-seven

Discussion

Vertebral cement augmentation, via vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, has been a successful treatment for symptomatic VCFs with good pain relief and improved disability scores [1], [4], [5], [9], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Although the rate of additional VCFs has been reported to be as high as 50%, some of these fractures are asymptomatic. The incidence of symptomatic VCFs ranges from 4.2% to 37% over a 6- to 12-month time span [4], [5], [7], [9], [17]. In our population, 22.2% of patients

References (30)

  • J.T. Ledlie et al.

    Kyphoplasty treatment of vertebral fractures: 2-year outcomes show sustained benefits

    Spine

    (2006)
  • A.A. Uppin et al.

    Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis

    Radiology

    (2003)
  • I.A. Grafe et al.

    Reduction of pain and fracture incidence after kyphoplasty: 1-year outcomes of a prospective controlled trial of patients with primary osteoporosis

    Osteoporos Int

    (2005)
  • J.G. Grohs et al.

    Minimal invasive stabilization of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective nonrandomized comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty

    J Spinal Disord Tech

    (2005)
  • I.H. Lieberman et al.

    Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

    Spine

    (2001)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Usefulness of Fat Suppression Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Preventing Subsequent Fractures After Kyphoplasty

      2019, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Which risk factors are associated with subsequent OVFs is controversial. Although some data have implicated long-term steroid use,21 a prospective study of 726 patients failed to identify any risk factor associated with the development of subsequent OVFs,32 and 2 RCTs on balloon kyphoplasty did not examine the topic at all.7,9 Therefore, imaging modalities capable of identifying vertebrae at higher risk for subsequent fracture would be of great clinical value.

    • Use of corticosteroids is not associated with repeated vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty within one year after the surgery in patient older than 50 years

      2017, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Risk factors for VCFs include steroid use, prior VCFs, smoking, the female sex, and local kyphosis.16–18 Possible risk factors for new VCFs after PVP or kyphoplasty include chronic oral steroid use, osteoporosis,19 and the treatment level being the thoracolumbar junction.20 To clarify how corticosteroid use might increase the rate of new VCFs after PVP or kyphoplasty and cause the need for repeating these procedures, we determined the incidence of and calculated the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio for repeated PVPs or kyphoplasties in a 1-year study period after the first PVP or kyphoplasty for patients with and without exposure to corticosteroids in this population-based cohort study.

    • CT Hounsfield Units as a Predictor for the Worsening of Traumatic Vertebral Compression Fractures

      2016, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Apparently, those that involve the thoracolumbar junction, show injury to the superior end plate and disc, show high levels of bone edema, and possess anterior ligamentous injury are at risk for significant segmental kyphotic deformity.17,18 Moreover, factors associated with new VCF after vertebral augmentation of an index level include osteoporosis, low BMI, number of preexisting fractures, older age, number of treated vertebrae, involvement at the thoracolumbar junction in initial VCFs, cement distraction, and steroid use.19-23 Poor bone quality has been linked with nonunion, instrumentation failure,24 tendency for vertebral fractures, and progression of vertebral fractures.

    • A combined experimental and computational study of mechanical properties after balloon kyphoplasty

      2021, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

    Author disclosures: ACC (speaking/teaching arrangements, DePuy Spine, K2M; fellowship support, DePuy Spine); RAH (royalties, DePuy, Seaspine; private investments, including venture capital, start-ups, Spineconnect; consulting, DePuy, Medtronic, Baxano; speaking/teaching arrangements, AO, DePuy, Kyphon, Medtronic; trips/travel, Synthes; research support: staff/materials, DePuy; grants, Medtronic; fellowship support, DePuy); RLT (speaking/teaching arrangements, Stryker Spine; trips/travel, Stryker Spine).

    View full text