Clinical StudyImpact of occupational characteristics on return to work for employed patients after elective lumbar spine surgery
Introduction
Low back pain is a leading cause of global disability [1]. Estimated costs of low back pain in the United States (US) are more than $100 billion annually, with two-thirds of the cost directly related to decreased productivity and lost wages [2]. Around 10% of all the acute pain episodes progress to chronic refractory nature and require surgical management in order to reduce their disability and regain meaningful functionality in daily life and in the workplace [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. In recent decades, there has been an exponential rise in the rates of low back surgeries. Deyo et al. reported a 15-fold increase in spinal fusion from 2002 to 2007 [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Given the increasing prevalence of these procedures and the significant costs they impose on individual patients, payers and the healthcare system as a whole, it is imperative to develop metrics to determine which patients will benefit the most from surgery and identify the modifiable risks.
Return to work (RTW) is a key metric in surgical outcomes, as it has profound implications for both individual patients and the economy at large [13]. The literature identifies around 82% of patients successfully returning to work after elective lumbar spine surgery [14]. A myriad of factors have been reported to impact a patient's likelihood of RTW after surgical management of back related disability. Chief among these are various work-related factors such as occupational intensity and worker's compensation status. However, these predictors for failure to RTW are similar to predictors identified for poor improvement in ODI (Oswestry Disability Index), satisfaction or having an adverse event after surgery and one may argue that the limited improvement in pain related disability or postoperative adverse events put the patients at risk for failure to RTW [12]. There is a paucity of literature on those that do well as measured by legacy metrics yet do not RTW.
In this study, we investigated the factors associated with RTW in patients who achieved otherwise favorable outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. We hypothesized that occupational characteristics will play a major role in determining whether patients return to work after an otherwise successful lumbar surgery.
Section snippets
Quality outcomes database registry
The Quality and Outcomes Database is a nationwide web-based registry prospectively enrolling patients undergoing surgery for degenerative spine diseases. A standardized enrollment process is used across over 86 participating sites (academic and private, high and low volume) [15]. For this study, we queried the lumbar module and extracted data for patients with complete 12-month follow-up. The average 1-year follow-up for the contributing sites was 78.5%, ranging from 66.7% to 95.3%. Full
Results
Of the total 12,435 patients that were employed at the time of surgery, 9,768 (78.6%) returned to work at 3-month and an additional 836 (6.7%) returned to work at 12-month follow-up. A total of 10,604 (85.3%) returning to work at 1-year postsurgery; 69.7% of the patients had good surgical outcomes and had no adverse events (readmissions/complications), had achieved 30% improvement in ODI and were satisfied at 3-month postsurgery, whereas 30.3% had poor surgical outcomes. Among patients who had
Discussion
Surgical management of lumbar pathology has been proven to effectively improve functionality and allow patients to RTW. However, around 25% of the surgically managed patients report minimal improvement in quality of life and up to 10% experiences a major complication or hospital readmission postsurgery [18], [19], [20], [21]. In the present age of patient-centered care and detailed emphasis on patient-reported outcomes, postsurgical RTW has been identified as an important metric. Previous
Conclusions
This study identifies two sets of risk factors for failure to RTW—those that are dependent on the outcomes and safety profile of the surgery and those that are independent of those factors. Most of the occupational risk factors identified are independent of patient reported outcomes of surgical success. Patients who were not working actively and were on leave or short-term disability, those within more physically demanding jobs, and those who had filed for worker's compensation before their
Acknowledgments
This study did not receive funding from any institution or grant. Financial support and industry affiliations: Dr. Khan reports receiving a grant from the CSRS $25,000 outside the submitted work. Dr. Archer reports personal fees from Pacira, Palladian Health, NeuroPoint Alliance, Inc., American Physical Therapy Board outside the submitted work. Dr. Shaffrey reports royalties from Medtronic, Nuvasive, Zimmer, Biomet, In Vivo, Stryker, and K2M outside the submitted work. Dr. Devin reports a
References (28)
- et al.
Management of back pain in patients with previous back surgery
Am J Med
(2008) Management of back pain in patients with previous back surgery
Am J Med
(2008)- et al.
A predictive model of complications after spine surgery: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2005–2010
Spine J
(2014) - et al.
The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study
Ann Rheum Dis
(2014) Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2006)- et al.
Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2006) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for back pain
N Engl J Med
(2007)Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(1982)- et al.
Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial
JAMA
(2006) - et al.
Treatment of refractory, chronic low back pain with botulinum neurotoxin A: an open-label, pilot study
Pain Med
(2006)
Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults
JAMA
Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis based on a randomized, controlled trial
Neurosurgery
Low back pain in older adults: are we utilizing healthcare resources wisely?
Pain Med.
An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making
J Neurosurg Spine
Cited by (34)
Workability and Life Satisfaction: Effects of Workers' Positive Perceptions on Their Return to Jobs
2022, Safety and Health at WorkCitation Excerpt :As the characteristics of their workplaces at the time of the accidents, the employment status of the workers (e.g., whether they were full-time workers or not), the features of their job (e.g., managerial or professional [15]), and the size of the workplaces/firms could also be factors that (in)directly affects the workability of workers [7,8,15,16]. Some demographic variables (e.g., age, gender, education level, marriage, income, and residence of metropolitan cities) could be influencing their return to work [7–9,15,17]. To summarize the literature review so far, emotional expectations and satisfaction about the ability or feeling to work, rehabilitation services experience, the impact of industrial accidents, and personal circumstances could be critical factors in workers' return to job markets after accidents.
Preoperative Resilience and Early Postoperative Outcomes following Lumbar Spinal Fusion
2022, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :One prior study of 12,435 patients found that 78.6% of patients return to work at 3 months. Therefore, although this follow-up period is significant to assess outcomes of surgery, future studies should assess if the same outcomes are also seen at 12 months.31 An additional limitation is other confounding variables.
Neurosurgeons Relate Heterogeneous Practices Regarding Activity and Return to Work After Spine Surgery
2022, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :To date, only a small number of studies have examined the association between recovery time and return to work time after spine surgery21,22; however, these are objective economic metrics that likely will appear more often in future publications about the topic. Most studies that have addressed this component of care have done so through the lens of retrospective analysis, with some attempting to predict factors that might influence return to work after elective spine surgery while emphasizing the role of postoperative care to various degrees23,24; however, many of these studies have emanated from social systems quite different than the United States, such as Sweden25 and Finland.26 Nonetheless, it is worth noting that there has been an increased interest in this topic in the past few years.
Effects of Workload on Return to Work After Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery
2024, Global Spine JournalWhat are the common factors that lead to the failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference after shoulder surgery? A scoping review
2024, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.
Author disclosures: IK: NeuroPoint Alliance = Level D. $25,001-50,000, Research Grant CSRS = Level C. $10,001- 25,000. KRA: NeuroPoint Alliance = Level E. $50,001- 100,000, No financial benefits from: PACIRA, Palladin Health or American Physical Therapy Board. CS: Royalties from Medtronic, Royalties: Medtronic, Nuvasive, Zimmer, Bionet, In VIVO, Stryker, K2M = Level D. $25,001-50,000. CJD: Royalties from Wright Medical; Consulting: Stryker, Medtronic Legal; Board of Directors: Defense Expert Witness; Grants: Stryker = Level D. $25,001-50,000.
IRB approval/Research Ethics Committee: The QOD project is designated as a non-research, clinical quality improvement effort and base on existing federal guidelines exempted from IRB review.