Original ArticleIs the Risk of Aorta Injury or Impingement Higher During Correction Surgery in Patients with Severe and Rigid Scoliosis?
Introduction
Severe and rigid scoliosis is commonly defined as the main curve Cobb angle >90°, with flexibility <30%, which mostly presents with rapid deformity progression and poor cardiopulmonary function.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Surgical options include preoperative and/or perioperative halo-gravity traction, anterior release and posterior instrumentation, and spinal osteotomies, such as vertebral column resection.6, 7, 8 Typically, the risk of surrounding tissue injury by misplaced pedicle screws should not be ignored, especially the aorta. Severe vertebral rotation as well as abnormal pedicle morphology make it hard to place pedicle screws exactly. Main curve rigidity requires more torsional force intraoperatively to move over, which could break out the screws. Some investigators have focused on the spatial relationship between aorta and spine in patients with scoliosis, and several cases of serious iatrogenic aortic injury caused by pedicle screw misplacement have been reported.9,10 However, only patients with a moderate primary curve (40°–70°) were included in those studies.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 It remains unknown whether those conclusions are appropriate for patients with severe and rigid scoliosis.
Severe and rigid scoliosis is often combined with challenging anatomy or other deformities, such as deformed rib cages, dysplastic pedicles, intravertebral torsion, and deformed dural sac, which could impede the precision of pedicle cannulation and screw insertion.18 Severe rotational deformity in apical levels and an angled curve could make vessels and neural elements malpositioned and easily injured. Furthermore, the aorta lay at an angle preoperatively, which was elongated and strained when the spinal column lengthened during scoliosis correction, making the aortic wall more vulnerable.19, 20, 21 Some previous studies22,23 have reported spontaneous aorta rupture from an acute angle because of severe kyphoscoliosis. Thus, the irregular position of the aorta, the complicated anatomy, and the great difficulty in correction surgery may synchronously impose increased risk on the aorta. This study evaluates the aorta position relative to the vertebra and estimates the aortic injury risk caused by pedicle screw misplacement through computed tomography (CT) scan images in patients with severe and rigid scoliosis.
Section snippets
Study Sample
A total of 27 patients with idiopathic severe and rigid scoliosis (female/male = 1.7:1) with a right thoracic or thoracolumbar main curve undergoing posterior instrumentation between January 2017 and July 2019 were recruited. Only patients with dextroscoliosis were included because of left-sided concavity and proximity to aorta. All patients had no previous spinal or aortic surgery or congenital vascular malformation. The mean age and height at surgery were 15.6 ± 6.1 years (range, 7.2–29.3
Results
Parameters measured on CT scan images are shown in Table 2. The angle β peaked at the apical vertebra level at 47.5° ± 12.3°, which indicated a declining tendency cranially and caudally, and decreased gradually to a negative value at B4. Conversely, the lowest value of EAD (22.2 ± 5.6 mm) was detected at the apical vertebra level, which showed an increasing tendency cranially and caudally, with a greater caudal increase (range, 22.2–40.0 mm) than cranial increase (range, 22.2–25.1 mm). Both
Clinical Context
Iatrogenic injury to the aorta, which is usually detected by postoperative radiology, is a relatively rare but well-recognized complication of a variety of procedures, especially in spine surgery. In patients with scoliosis, the aorta is malpositioned with the deformed spine, which increases the possibility of the aorta on the route of the pedicle screw. There have been increased concerns about the potential risk of neurologic and vascular injury resulting from pedicle screw misplacements.16
Conclusions
The aorta in patients with a severe scoliotic curve is located further away in the apical region, and the injury risk caused by pedicle screw misplacement at the apical vertebra is lower than in patients with a moderate curve. Neurospinal surgeons should be fully aware of this rare but fatal complication. Most potential risks can be minimized by carefully preoperative planning as well as intraoperative neuronavigation or robotic assistance.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Honghao Yang: Writing - review & editing, Formal analysis. Ziyang Liu: Data curation. Li Guan: Writing - review & editing. Yuzeng Liu: Writing - review & editing. Tie Liu: Writing - review & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization. Yong Hai: Supervision.
References (31)
A case of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in association with congenital kyphoscoliosis
Eur J Vasc Surg
(1993)- et al.
Aortic rupture after spinal correction for scoliosis in the presence of a thoracic stent graft
J Vasc Surg
(2010) - et al.
180 degrees kyphosis of both the vertebral column and the aorta
Spine J
(2016) - et al.
Delayed presentation of aortic injury by pedicle screws: report of two cases and review of the literature
J Vasc Surg
(2008) - et al.
Three-dimensional-printed individualized guiding templates for surgical correction of severe kyphoscoliosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis: outcomes of 9 cases
World Neurosurg
(2019) - et al.
Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study
J Orthop Surg Res
(2007) - et al.
Anterior release internal distraction and posterior spinal fusion for severe and rigid scoliosis
Spine
(2013) - et al.
Three-staged correction of severe rigid idiopathic scoliosis using limited halo-gravity traction
Eur Spine J
(2012) - et al.
Long-term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis. A study of mortality, causes of death, and symptoms
Spine
(1992) - et al.
Results of preoperative pulmonary function testing of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. A study of six hundred and thirty-one patients
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2005)
Comparison of radiographic outcomes for the treatment of scoliotic curves greater than 100 degrees: wires versus hooks versus screws
Spine
Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical procedure
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees
Spine
Malpositioned pedicle screw compressed thoracic aorta of a patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: case report and literature review
Tech Orthop
The “screwed aorta” after spinal deformity surgery
Br J Neurosurg
Cited by (3)
What is the impact of scoliotic correction on postoperative shoulder imbalance in severe and rigid scoliosis
2021, BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersUnderstanding the aorta-spine relation in idiopathic scoliosis: Value of noncontrast ct-derived curved coronal reformats and 3D volume images
2021, International Journal of Spine Surgery
Conflict of interest statement: This research was supported by Capital Medical University XSKY Program: XSKY2015162, XSKY2019172; Capital Medical University Science Foundation: PYZ2018018; Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Foundation: CYXX-2017-13.
Honghao Yang and Tie Liu are co-first authors.