Elsevier

Seminars in Spine Surgery

Volume 28, Issue 4, December 2016, Pages 233-238
Seminars in Spine Surgery

BMP-2 with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical usage and recent controversies

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semss.2016.08.006Get rights and content

Abstract

BMP-2 in the spine was first introduced as an adjunct to anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). The best available evidence suggests increased fusion rates with BMP-2, which has led many to view it as a replacement for iliac crest autograft. It may also be beneficial in patients who are at higher risk for pseudarthrosis. In either case, only a few studies have shown a favorable cost–benefit ratio. The complication profile of BMP-2 has come under recent scrutiny, dependent not only on its biologic properties but also the dosage, carrier properties, surgical approach, and graft containment technique. Recently highlighted issues such as retrograde ejaculation, heterotopic ossification, and radiculitis have been associated with its use in the lumbar spine. An understanding of the benefits, risks, and costs of BMP-2 use in ALIF can help identify patients who are most likely to benefit from it and promote informed decision-making.

Introduction

Since discovery of the osteogenic potential of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) in the 1960s, there has been interest in its potential for clinical application in orthopedic surgery.1 BMP-2, in its recombinant human form (rhBMP), has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with a titanium metallic cage. However, off-label application has spread widely to a variety of cervical and lumbar interventions.2

Given initial positive results and the reported low risk of adverse effects, the use of the BMP-2 increased significantly during the 2000s. It was used in less than 1% of all spine surgery in 2002 and greater than 50% of ALIFs and 40% of posterolateral lumbar fusions in 2007.3 Since then, however, greater awareness of potential complications associated with its use has led to judicious reassessment of the role of BMP-2 in ALIF, and in spine surgery as a whole.4, 5 Decision-making regarding the use of BMP-2 continues to evolve with greater understanding of its benefits and complications. The goal of the current review is to characterize the best case use of rhBMP-2 in ALIF and to explore some of the more commonly associated complications: retrograde ejaculation, heterotopic ossification, and radiculitis.

Section snippets

Review of best use case

The introduction of rhBMP-2 into spine surgery began with its very specific FDA approval in 2002 for application in a single-level ALIF using a titanium, threaded, tapered interbody cage at L4-5 or L5-S1. Several studies have evaluated the radiographic outcomes of ALIF with use of rhBMP-2. Figure 1 shows postoperative radiograph of patient who underwent single-level ALIF with a cage. In a small prospective randomized trial of 14 patients undergoing ALIF, Boden et al.6 showed a 100% fusion rate

Retrograde ejaculation

Manipulation of the superior hypogastric plexus during ALIF can lead to development of retrograde ejaculation (RE) with rates reported from 0.5% to 10%.18, 22, 23, 24 Initial studies showed no adverse RE events with use of rhBMP-2. However, FDA reports did acknowledge a slightly higher but statistically insignificant higher risk of RE. BMP-2 is postulated to increase risk of RE by promoting a local inflammatory response near the disc space or by formation of ectopic bone in the region of the

Radiculitis

Postoperative radiculitis is defined as worsening leg pain in a dermatomal distribution that is not necessarily associated with nerve compression. Although limited by the scope and quality of previous studies, in a meta-analysis of five randomized trials of BMP-2 in ALIF as part of the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) project, Fu et al.18 found no difference in worsening leg pain or radiculitis in the immediate and later postoperative period. They appropriately noted that, “adverse events

Heterotopic ossification

In patients undergoing ALIF with BMP-2, heterotopic ossification (HO) can occur presumably when the biological agent leaks from the collagen carrier into the extradiscal space. The formation of heterotopic ossification is usually triggered by an inducing trauma to bone or musculature, formation of a hematoma containing mesenchymal progenitor cells, and an environment conducive to osteogenesis.41 BMP induces the undifferentiated mesenchymal cells to enter a pathway for the development of bone,

Conclusions

The introduction and adoption of BMP-2 with ALIF (and spine surgery in general) has led to increased scrutiny of its benefits and risks. Although harvesting iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) has been portrayed as a potentially painful and disabling procedure, a review of prospective randomized control studies have shown no clinical difference in health-related functional outcome measures in patients treated with BMP-2 and ICBG.48 The best available evidence does suggest increased fusion rates with

References (48)

  • M.R. Urist

    Bone: formation by autoinduction

    Science

    (1965)
  • K.L. Ong et al.

    Off-label use of bone morphogenetic proteins in the United States using administrative data

    Spine

    (2010)
  • S.D. Boden et al.

    The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report

    Spine

    (2000)
  • J.K. Burkus et al.

    Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages

    J Spinal Disord Tech

    (2002)
  • F. Galimberti et al.

    A systematic review of lumbar fusion rates with and without the use of rhBMP-2

    Spine

    (2015)
  • J.K. Burkus et al.

    Is INFUSE bone graft superior to autograft bone? An integrated analysis of clinical trials using the LT-CAGE lumbar tapered fusion device

    J Spinal Disord Tech

    (2003)
  • J.K. Burkus et al.

    Influence of rhBMP-2 on the healing patterns associated with allograft interbody constructs in comparison with autograft

    Spine

    (2006)
  • J.K. Burkus et al.

    Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2

    Spine

    (2002)
  • T.J. Kleeman et al.

    Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2: a prospective study of clinical and radiographic outcomes

    Spine

    (2001)
  • E. Behrbalk et al.

    Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2

    Eur Spine J

    (2013)
  • R. Vaidya et al.

    Interbody fusion with allograft and rhBMP-2 leads to consistent fusion but early subsidence

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2007)
  • J.K. Burkus et al.

    Six-year outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis with use of interbody fusion cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2009)
  • C.P. Hofstetter et al.

    Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and morbidity of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal arthrodesis surgery

    J Neurosurg Spine

    (2016)
  • R. Fu et al.

    Effectiveness and harms of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in spine fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Ann Intern Med

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text