Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: After lumbar or lumbosacral fusion for various spine disorders, adjacent segment disease has been reported. Most of the studies have focused on proximal segment disease. The author has reported sacroiliac joint degeneration in these patients. Based on our own experiences with an increasing number of patients with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) arthralgia after multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral fusion procedures, we evaluated a surgical procedure called distraction arthrodesis of the SIJ for patients with refractory severe pain of the SIJ.

Materials and Methods: Nineteen (19) consecutive patients were recruited and evaluated prospectively after undergoing distraction arthrodesis of the SIJ. The inclusion criteria for the surgical procedure were degeneration of the SIJ and failed conservative treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and CT scans were performed in all cases. The clinical outcome was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). CT scans were performed postoperatively and again at the final followup to evaluate assess fusion. The data was analyzed using the SPSS software (version 10.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL) and statistical analysis was performed. The P values were based on the Student t-test.

Results: The mean followup was 13.2 months. All patients had an instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. The overall fusion rate of SIJ was 78.9% (15/19 joints). All patients demonstrated significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores compared to preoperative values. The mean VAS score was 8.5 before surgery and was 6 at final followup, demonstrating 30% improvement. The mean ODI scores were 64.1 before surgery and 56.97 at the final followup, demonstrating 12% improvement.

Conclusions: Refractory sacroiliac pain as a result of multi-level fusion surgery can be successfully treated with minimally invasive arthrodesis. It offers a safe and effective treatment for severe SIJ pain. Careful patient selection is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshihara H. Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar/Lumbosacral fusion: Current knowledge. Eur Spine J 2012;21;1788–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liliang PC, Lu K, Liang CL, Tsai YD, Wang KW, Chen HJ. Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: Findings using dual sacroiliac joint blocks. Pain Med 2011;12;565–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park P, Garton H, Gala V, Hoff J, McGillicuddy J. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: Review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29;1938–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frigerio N, Stowe R, Howe J. Movement of the sacroiliac joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1974;100;370–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maigne J, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer E. Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21;1889–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwarzer A, Aprill C, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20;31–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ha K, Lee J, Kim K. Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: A prospective cohort study over five-year followup. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33;1192–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berthelot J, Gouin F, Glemarec J. Possible use of arthrodesis for intractable sacroilitis in spondyloarthropathy: Report of two cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26;2297–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchowski J, Kebaish K, Sinkov V. Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint. Spine J 2005;5;520–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rand J. Anterior sacro-iliac arthrodesis for posttraumatic sacroiliac arthritis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg 1985;67A: 157–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith-Petersen M, Rogers W. End-result study of arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for arthritis-traumatic and nontraumatic. J Bone Joint Surg 1926;8;118–36.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waisbrod H, Krainick J, Gerbershagen H. Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis for chronic lower back pain. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1987;106;238–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebraheim N, Coombs R, Rusin J. Percutaneous CT-guided stabilization of complex sacroiliac joint disruption with threaded compression bars. Orthopaedics 1992;15;1427–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leighton R, Waddell J. Techniques for reduction and posterior fixation through the anterior approach. Clin Orthop 1986;329;115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tile M. Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khurana A, Guha A R, Mohanty K, Ahuja S. Percutaneous fusion of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws-clinical and radiological outcome. J Bone Joint Surg 2009;91;627–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Endres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Endres, S., Ludwig, E. Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis. IJOO 47, 437–442 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.118197

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.118197

Key words

Navigation