Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Decompressive Laminectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

For Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), both decompression alone and decompression with fusion are effective surgical treatments. Which of the two techniques is superior is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after decompression alone versus decompression with fusion for Grade I DLS

Materials and Methods

139 patients who underwent surgery for Grade I DLS at L4–L5 were prospectively enrolled. Decompression alone was used to treat 74 patients, and decompression with fusion was used to treat 65 patients. Six patients in the first group and four patients in the second group were lost during the 2-year followup. Demographic data were recorded. Operation time, perioperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Back pain and functional outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively

Results

Baseline demographic data were not different between the two groups. Operation time, blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, and length of hospital stay were all significantly greater in the fusion group than in the decompression group. This would be expected because fusion is the more invasive procedure. VAS scores were not different up until 6 months postoperatively. Twelve months after surgery, however, VAS scores were significantly lower in the fusion group. The same results were shown in terms of ODI. Although ODI decreased in both groups over time, the fusion group showed better functional outcomes than did the decompression group

Conclusions

Although both decompression alone and decompression with fusion improved functional outcomes for Grade I DLS, fusion surgery resulted in better results compared to decompression alone. Therefore, fusion should be considered as the treatment of choice for Grade I DLS

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, Monrad H, Gebuhr P. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: An epidemiological perspective: The copenhagen osteoarthritis study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:120–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Iguchi T, Wakami T, Kurihara A, Kasahara K, Yoshiya S, Nishida K. Lumbar multilevel degenerative spondylolisthesis: Radiological evaluation and factors related to anterolisthesis and retrolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsunaga S, Ijiri K, Hayashi K. Nonsurgically managed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: A 10- to 18-year followup study. J Neurosurg 2000;93 2 Suppl: 194–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brisby H. Nerve root injuries in patients with chronic low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 2003;34:221–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalichman L, Hunter DJ. Diagnosis and conservative management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 2008;17:327–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:802–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O’Brien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:461–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sigmundsson FG, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B. Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: A register study of 1,624 patients. Spine J 2015;15:638–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jang JW, Park JH, Hyun SJ, Rhim SC. Clinical outcomes and radiologic changes after microsurgical bilateral decompression by a unilateral approach in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis with a minimum 3-year followup. Clin Spine Surg 2016;29:268–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Amin-Hanjani S, Barker FG nd, Harrington JF, Magge SN, et al. Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:267–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K, Reilly J. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1978;3:319–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berlemann U, Jeszenszky DJ, Bühler DW, Harms J. The role of lumbar lordosis, vertebral end-plate inclination, disc height, and facet orientation in degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 1999;12:68–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Blood EA, Tosteson AN, et al. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Lee HM, Kang KT, Lee CK, Chang BS, et al. The biomechanical influence of the facet joint orientation and the facet tropism in the lumbar spine. Spine J 2013;13:1301–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ha KY, Chang CH, Kim KW, Kim YS, Na KH, Lee JS. Expression of estrogen receptor of the facet joints in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:562–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsui Y, Mirza SK, Wu JJ, Carter B, Bellabarba C, Shaffrey CI, et al. The association of lumbar spondylolisthesis with collagen IX tryptophan alleles. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:1021–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2257–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eismont FJ, Norton RP, Hirsch BP. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014;22:203–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Simmonds AM, Rampersaud YR, Dvorak MF, Dea N, Melnyk AD, Fisher CG. Defining the inherent stability of degenerative spondylolisthesis: A systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 2015;23:178–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Resnick DK, Watters WC 3rd, Sharan A, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, Wang JC, et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: Lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Park JH, Hyun SJ, Roh SW, Rhim SC. A comparison of unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression and fusion surgery in the treatment of grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1205–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasegawa K, Kitahara K, Shimoda H, Ishii K, Ono M, Homma T, et al. Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is not always unstable: Clinicobiomechanical evidence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:2127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Phan KH, Daubs MD, Kupperman AI, Scott TP, Wang JC. Kinematic analysis of diseased and adjacent segments in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine J 2015;15:230–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kristof RA, Aliashkevich AF, Schuster M, Meyer B, Urbach H, Schramm J. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis-induced radicular compression: Nonfusion-related decompression in selected patients without hypermobility on flexion extension radiographs. J Neurosurg 2002;97 3 Suppl: 281–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sato S, Yagi M, Machida M, Yasuda A, Konomi T, Miyake A, et al. Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: Minimum 5-year followup. Spine J 2015;15:1536–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Kurd MF, Vaccaro AR, Hsu WK, Patel AA, et al. Rationale for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:E1161–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Rihn JA, Albert TJ, et al. National trends in the use of fusion techniques to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:1584–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boden SD. Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27 16 Suppl 1:S26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ha KY, Lee JS, Kim KW. Bone graft volumetric changes and clinical outcomes after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: A prospective cohort study with a five-year followup. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1663–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to In-Soo Oh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, SI., Ha, KY., Kim, YH. et al. A Comparative Study of Decompressive Laminectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. IJOO 52, 358–362 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_330_16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_330_16

Keywords

MeSH terms

Navigation