Skip to main content
Log in

Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The most appropriate fusion levels remains challenging, especially in Lenke type 5 curves. In Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) generally fusion includes the lower end vertebra (LEV). This study determines whether it is appropriate to fuse mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves to LEV-1, if possible.

Materials and Methods

Forty-two patients with mild to moderate Lenke 5 AIS that underwent posterior fusion were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative goal was to stop the instrumentation at LEV-1 in all patients if possible. However, the final decision was made intraoperatively according to the alignment of the disc below lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). In 19 patients, this goal was achieved and LIV was LEV-1, whereas 23 patients were fused to LEV. Hence, two groups occurred and they were compared in terms of coronal, sagittal, and LIV related parameters at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. Surgical times were also noted. Clinical outcomes were assessed using scoliosis research society (SRS-22) and Short Form-36 questionnaires.

Results

Two groups were well matched according to preoperative values. Postoperative radiographic results were also similar, except LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which were significantly higher in LEV-1 group at 1 and 3 years followup (P < 0.05). Surgical times were significantly longer in LEV group (P = 0.036). No significant correction loss was observed between 1 and 3 years followup. There were no significant differences regarding postoperative clinical outcomes except the activity domain of SRS-22, which was significantly higher in LEV-1 group, but the significance was weak (P = 0.045).

Conclusions

Fusion to LEV-1was associated with the higher amount of LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which did not cause coronal and sagittal imbalance and decreased the quality of life scores. Hence, if intraoperatively a level disc below LIV can be achieved, fusion to LEV-1 may be an option in mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves, to save one more mobile segment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trobisch PD, Ducoffe AR, Lonner BS, Errico TJ. Choosing fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013;21:519–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83-A: 1169–81.

  3. Rose PS, Lenke LG. Classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Treatment guidelines. Orthop Clin North Am 2007;38:521–9, vi.

  4. Sanchez-Raya J, Bago J, Pellise F, Cuxart A, Villanueva C. Does the lower instrumented vertebra have an effect on lumbar mobility, subjective perception of trunk flexibility, and quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated by spinal fusion? J Spinal Disord Tech 2012;25:437–42.

  5. Sun Z, Qiu G, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zhang J, Shen J, et al. Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection for selective posterior fusion of moderate thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis: Lower-end vertebra or lower-end vertebra+1? Eur Spine J 2014;23:1251–7.

  6. Hong JY, Suh SW, Yang JH, Park SY, Han JH. Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures: Comparison of the 4 available methods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E1684–90.

  7. Perdriolle R, Vidal J. A study of scoliotic curve. The importance of extension and vertebral rotation (author’s transl). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1981;67:25–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Halm H, Niemeyer T, Link T, Liljenqvist U. Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2000;9:191–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ, Clark CE. The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Posterior shortening and pedicle screw. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:269–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geck MJ, Rinella A, Hawthorne D, Macagno A, Koester L, Sides B, et al. Comparison of surgical treatment in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle fixation surgery: A comparison of two practice. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1942–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li M, Ni J, Fang X, Liu H, Zhu X, He S, et al. Comparison of selective anterior versus posterior screw instrumentation in lenke5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosi. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1162–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Z, Guo J, Zhu Z, Qian B, Sun X, Xu L, et al. Role of the upper and lowest instrumented vertebrae in predicting the postoperative coronal balance in Lenke 5C patients after selective posterior fusion. Eur Spine J 2013;22:2392–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li J, Hwang SW, Shi Z, Yan N, Yang C, Wang C, et al. Analysis of radiographic parameters relevant to the lowest instrumented vertebrae and postoperative coronal balance in Lenke 5C patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1673–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lark RK, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Newton PO, Harms Study Group. Adding thoracic fusion levels in Lenke 5 curves: Risks and benefit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders AE, Baumann R, Brown H, Johnston CE 2nd, Lenke LG, Sink E, et al. Selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in adolescents: When can the associated thoracic curve be left unfused? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:706–13.

  16. Okada E, Watanabe K, Pang L, Ogura Y, Takahashi Y, Hosogane N, et al. Posterior correction and fusion surgery using pedicle-screw construct for Lenke Type 5C Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2014;40:25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Y, Bünger CE, Zhang Y, Wu C, Li H, Dahl B, et al. Lowest instrumented vertebra selection for lenke 5C scoliosis: A minimum 2-year radiographical followup. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E894–900.

  18. Courvoisier A, Garin C, Vialle R, Kohler R. The change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2015;31:2325–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee MC, Õunpuu S, Solomito M, Smith BG, Thomson JD. Loss in spinal motion from inclusion of a single midlumbar level in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E1405–10.

  20. Takayama K, Nakamura H, Matsuda H. Low back pain in patients treated surgically for scoliosis: Longer than sixteen-year followu. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2198–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Green DW, Lawhorne TW 3rd, Widmann RF, Kepler CK, Ahern C, Mintz DN, et al. Long term magnetic resonance imaging followup demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosi. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1948–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marks M, Newton PO, Petcharaporn M, Bastrom TP, Shah S, Betz R, et al. Postoperative segmental motion of the unfused spine distal to the fusion in 100 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosi. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:826–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Emre Ketenci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ketenci, I.E., Yanik, H.S., Ulusoy, A. et al. Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra?. IJOO 52, 657–664 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_579_16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_579_16

Keywords

MeSH terms

Navigation