"Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;112(1-2):62-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01402455.

Abstract

The "conservative" microsurgical lumbar discectomy described by Williams for the treatment of herniated lumbar disc is compared in a retrospective study with the standard microsurgical technique of Caspar and Loew. In order to enable such a retrospective comparison, a special randomization had to be chosen. The data concerning outcome are based on a questionnaire, in which the patient can describe his actual health situation. The result in the group of 56 patients operated on by the Williams technique with a mean follow-up of 27 months is excellent or good in 89% vs. 74% in the standard technique group. Reoperations due to a recurrence were identical in both groups (3.6% and 3.9%).

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / surgery*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae*
  • Male
  • Microsurgery / adverse effects
  • Microsurgery / methods*
  • Middle Aged
  • Random Allocation
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome