Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment

Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1478-85. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1052-3. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

Abstract

In advanced stages of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine instrumented spondylodesis is still the golden standard treatment. However, in recent years dynamic stabilisation devices are being implanted to treat the segmental instability due to iatrogenic decompression or segmental degeneration. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the stabilising effect of a classical pedicle screw/rod combination, with a moveable hinge joint connection between the screw and rod allowing one degree of freedom (cosmicMIA). Six human lumbar spines (L2-5) were loaded in a spine tester with pure moments of +/-7.5 Nm in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation. The range of motion (ROM) and the neutral zone were determined for the following states: (1) intact, (2) monosegmental dynamic instrumentation (L4-5), (3) bisegmental dynamic instrumentation (L3-5), (4) bisegmental decompression (L3-5), (5) bisegmental dynamic instrumentation (L3-5) and (6) bisegmental rigid instrumentation (L3-5). Compared to the intact, with monosegmental instrumentation (2) the ROM of the treated segment was reduced to 47, 40 and 77% in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation, respectively. Bisegmental dynamic instrumentation (3) further reduced the ROM in L4-5 compared to monosegmental instrumentation to 25% (lateral bending), 28% (flexion/extension) and 57% (axial rotation). Bisegmental surgical decompression (4) caused an increase in ROM in both segments (L3-4 and L4-5) to approximately 125% and approximately 135% and 187-234% in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation, respectively. Compared to the intact state, bisegmental dynamic instrumentation after surgical decompression reduced the ROM of the two-bridged segments to 29-35% in lateral bending and 33-38% in flexion/extension. In axial rotation, the ROM was in the range of the intact specimen (87-117%). A rigid instrumentation (6) further reduced the ROM of the two-bridged segments to 20-30, 23-27 and 50-68% in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation, respectively. The results of the present study showed that compared to the intact specimen the investigated hinged dynamic stabilisation device reduced the ROM after bisegmental decompression in lateral bending and flexion/extension. Following bisegmental decompression and the thereby caused large rotational instability the device is capable of restoring the motion in axial rotation back to values in the range of the intact motion segments.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomechanical Phenomena / physiology
  • Bone Screws*
  • Cadaver
  • Decompression, Surgical / instrumentation
  • Decompression, Surgical / methods*
  • Humans
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Internal Fixators*
  • Joint Instability / physiopathology
  • Joint Instability / surgery
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / anatomy & histology
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / physiopathology
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Movement / physiology
  • Neurosurgical Procedures / instrumentation
  • Neurosurgical Procedures / methods*
  • Range of Motion, Articular / physiology
  • Recovery of Function / physiology
  • Rotation
  • Spondylosis / pathology
  • Spondylosis / physiopathology
  • Spondylosis / surgery*
  • Zygapophyseal Joint / anatomy & histology
  • Zygapophyseal Joint / physiology