The content and accuracy of radiographic interpretations by radiologists was assessed to determine the reports' ability to provide sufficient information necessary to make clinical treatment decisions. A retrospective review was performed of 371 radiographic studies (211 consecutive patients) and their reports which had been generated by three Board-certified radiologists. Data were collected regarding fracture assessment and description as well as the description and assessment of orthopedic implants. These descriptions were categorized by their ability to be used clinically (precise) or not (general). Fracture descriptions were considered complete for 85% of reports, while their assessment of alignment and displacement (necessary to determine fracture care) was complete on only 9%. Orthopedic implants were described precisely on 12% of reports with 7% of the descriptions in error. The effect and position of orthopedic implants were described precisely for only 27% and 25% of cases, respectively, while implant stability was assessed precisely in only 4% of cases. For 61% of preoperative studies, the radiologist's report was not available until after the surgical procedure had already been performed. For all variables considered, an average of 3% of descriptions contained an error. Radiologists' reports of radiographs of these patients undergoing orthopedic procedures did not contain sufficient descriptive information to be used clinically, were not promptly available, and contained an error for 3% of variables studied. The attending orthopedic surgeon has traditionally interpreted such radiographs and should continue to do so to provide patients with more immediate and complete clinical evaluation and management.