Anterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: perioperative risk factors and 30-day outcomes

PS Upadhyayula, EI Curtis, JK Yue, N Sidhu… - International journal of …, 2018 - ijssurgery.com
Background: Operative management of lower back pain often necessitates anterior lumbar
interbody fusion (ALIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Specific …

Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database

V Goz, JH Weinreb, F Schwab, V Lafage, TJ Errico - The Spine Journal, 2014 - Elsevier
Background context Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) techniques have been used for years to
treat a number of pathologies of the lower back. These procedures may use an anterior …

A comparison of anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusions: complications, readmissions, discharge dispositions, and costs

R Qureshi, V Puvanesarajah, A Jain, AL Shimer… - Spine, 2017 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. Retrospective database review. Objective. To understand medical
complication rates, readmission rates, costs, and discharge dispositions in anterior lumbar …

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion–systematic review and meta-analysis

K Phan, GK Thayaparan, RJ Mobbs - British journal of …, 2015 - Taylor & Francis
Purpose. To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of anterior
lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) …

Variability and contributions to cost associated with anterior versus posterior approaches to lumbar interbody fusion

AM Crawford, HM Lightsey IV, GX Xiong… - Clinical Neurology and …, 2021 - Elsevier
Objective Lumbar interbody fusions are being performed with increased frequency in the last
decade. Anterior and posterior interbody techniques have demonstrated relatively similar …

Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study

C Seng, MA Siddiqui, KPL Wong, K Zhang, W Yeo… - Spine, 2013 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Objective. To compare
midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open …

[HTML][HTML] A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) …

J Rathbone, M Rackham, D Nielsen, SM Lee… - European Spine …, 2023 - Springer
Purpose The rate of elective lumbar fusion has continued to increase over the past two
decades. However, there remains to be a consensus on the optimal fusion technique. This …

Single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation at L5/S1

KC Jacob, MR Patel, MA Ribot, AW Parsons… - World Neurosurgery, 2022 - Elsevier
Objective To compare outcomes between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar
interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5/S1. Methods …

Radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

RM Ajiboye, H Alas, GM Mosich, A Sharma… - Clinical Spine …, 2018 - journals.lww.com
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: Compare the radiographic
and clinical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) to transforaminal lumbar …

Minimally invasive transforaminal versus direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion: effect on return to work, narcotic use, and quality of life

T Verla, L Winnegan, R Mayer, J Cherian, N Yaghi… - World neurosurgery, 2018 - Elsevier
Background Direct lateral (DLIF) and transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusions have
been shown to produce satisfactory clinical outcomes with significant reduction in pain and …