Similar Articles
-
Uniportal Endoscopic Interlaminar Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review
Kuang-Yuan Goh, Jui-Chen Hsu, Ching-Yu Lee, Tsung-Jen Huang, Chien-Min Chen and Meng-Huang Wu- International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2021, 15 (suppl 3) S54-S64;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8164
-
Therapeutic sustainability and durability of coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a four year assessment
Hyun W. Bae, Carl Lauryssen, Greg Maislin, Scott Leary and Michael J. Musacchio- International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2015, 9 15;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/2015
-
Evaluation of Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization Compared with Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 5-year Follow-up of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Michael J. Musacchio, Carl Lauryssen, Reginald J. Davis, Hyun W. Bae, John H. Peloza, Richard D. Guyer, Jack E. Zigler, Donna D. Ohnmeiss and Scott Leary- International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2016, 10 6;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/3006
-
Paired Comparison Survey Analysis Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT Code 0202T
Morgan Lorio, Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski, Matthew T. Yeager, Kelli Hallas, Richard Kube and James Yue- International Journal of Spine Surgery March 2024, 18 (2) 130-137;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8587
-
Full Endoscopic Lumbar Stenosis Decompression: A Future Gold Standard in Managing Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis
Asrafi Rizki Gatam, Luthfi Gatam, Phedy, Harmantya Mahadhipta, Ajiantoro and Dina Aprilya- International Journal of Spine Surgery October 2022, 16 (5) 821-830;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8338
-
Comparative Analysis of Learning Curve, Complexity, Psychological Stress, and Work Relative Value Units for CPT 62380 Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Decompression vs Traditional Lumbar Spine Surgeries: A Paired Rasch Survey Study
Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski, Heber Humberto Alfaro Pachicano, Rossano Kepler Alvim Fiorelli, John C. Elfar, Stefan Landgraeber, Joachim Oertel, Stefan Hellinger, Álvaro Dowling, Paulo Sérgio Teixeira De Carvalho, Max R. F. Ramos, Helton Defino, João Paulo Bergamaschi, Paul Houle, Nicola Montemurro, Christopher Yeung, Marcelo Brito, Douglas P. Beall, Gerd Ivanic, Zhang Xifeng, Zhen-Zhou Li, Hyeun-Sung Kim, Jin-Sung L. Kim and Morgan P. Lorio- International Journal of Spine Surgery April 2024, 18 (2) 138-151;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8594
-
Indirect Decompression for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
Peter B. Derman, Donna D. Ohnmeiss, Abbey Lauderback and Richard D. Guyer- International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2021, 15 (6) 1066-1071;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8192
-
Spinal Stenosis in the Absence of Spondylolisthesis: Can Interlaminar Stabilization at Single and Multi-levels Provide Sustainable Relief?
- International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2018, 12 (1) 64-69;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/5011
-
The 2-Level Experience of Interlaminar Stabilization: 5-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Experience Compared to Fusion for the Sustainable Management of Spinal Stenosis
RACHEL B. SIMON, CHRISTINA DOWE, SAMUEL GRINBERG, FRANK P. CAMMISA and CELESTE ABJORNSON- International Journal of Spine Surgery August 2018, 12 (4) 419-427;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/5050
-
Restoring Segmental Spinal Alignment in Mini-Open Lateral Spinal Deformity Surgery—Determiners of Radiographic Outcome
Alexander Spiessberger, Nicholas Dietz, Basil E. Gruter, Justin Virojanapa and Peter Hollis- International Journal of Spine Surgery June 2022, 16 (3) 540-547;
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8246