Comparison of Applied Anatomy at L4-L5 and L5-S1 in Context of Tubular Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

AG Kulkarni, S Asati - International journal of spine surgery, 2021 - ijssurgery.com
Background Tubular over-the-top decompression is getting popular in the management of
lumbar canal stenosis (LCS). While L4-L5 is the most common level affected and operated …

Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis

T Asari, S Aburakawa, G Kumagai… - Spine Surgery and …, 2017 - jstage.jst.go.jp
Introduction: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) is a very common disease. When the
responsible level is considered to be L4/5 despite the appearance of double-level (L3/4 and …

A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral …

Y Arai, T Hirai, T Yoshii, K Sakai, T Kato, M Enomoto… - Spine, 2014 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. A prospective comparative study. Objective. To compare prospectively 2
different types of minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) …

Comparison of short-term clinical results and radiologic changes between two different minimally invasive decompressive surgical methods for lumbar canal stenosis …

S Tanaka, K Wada, G Kumagai, T Asari, S Aburakawa… - Spine, 2021 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. A multicenter, retrospective study. Objective. To clarify the clinical and
radiological effects of removing interspinous contextures in lumbar decompression surgery …

Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study

MAR Soliman, A Ali - Neurosurgical Focus, 2019 - thejns.org
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical results of
bilateral interlaminar canal decompression and classic laminectomy in lumbar canal …

[HTML][HTML] Comparative analysis between three different lumbar decompression techniques (microscopic, tubular, and endoscopic) in lumbar canal and lateral recess …

CW Lee, KJ Yoon, SS Ha - BioMed research international, 2019 - hindawi.com
Purpose. The purpose of our study is to compare the results of spinal decompression using
the full-endoscopic interlaminar technique, tubular retractor, and a conventional …

“A decade with micro-tubular decompression”: Peri-operative complications and surgical outcomes in single and multilevel lumbar canal stenosis

J Patel, V Kundnani, S Kuriya - International Orthopaedics, 2021 - Springer
Purpose We present ten years experience with micro-tubular decompression (MTD)
performed for single and multilevel lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) assessing the peri …

Shape of the spinal canal is not associated with success rates of microsurgical unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis

B Schatlo, M Horanin, S Hernandez-Durán… - World Neurosurgery, 2018 - Elsevier
Background Anatomic shape of the spinal canal (oval, round, trefoil) has been reported to
predict outcome of bilateral decompression performed in an undercutting technique via …

Factors affecting the outcome of lumbar canal stenosis surgery: a two-year follow-up study

B Mirzashahi, KFM Yaseen, S Besharaty, N Bagheri… - 2022 - sid.ir
Background: Lumbar Canal Stenosis (LCS) is the most common reason for spinal Surgery in
older patients. Identifying factors influencing the outcome of surgical management is …

[PDF][PDF] Single incision tubular decompression to treat multi-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective review

AG Kulkarni, T Yeshwanth - … of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and …, 2022 - jmisst.org
Objective To evaluate the technical feasibility and assess the clinical outcomes of tubular
decompression (TD) in cases of multilevel lumbar canal stenosis operated through a single …