Lateral lumbar interbody fusion using expandable vs static titanium interbody cages: a prospective cohort study of clinical and radiographic outcomes

CW Huo, GM Malham, DT Biddau, T Chung… - International Journal of …, 2023 - ijssurgery.com
Background Expandable cages are a recent development employed to reduce subsidence
and improve fusion compared with static cages as they alleviate the need for repeated …

Expandable versus static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cages: 1-year radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes

J Woodward, L Koro, D Richards, C Keegan… - World Neurosurgery, 2022 - Elsevier
Objective Expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages capable of
multidirectional in situ expansion have gained popularity as they increase axial surface area …

Comparison of surgical outcomes between lumbar interbody fusions using expandable and static cages: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S Lee, JG Kim, HJ Kim - The Spine Journal, 2023 - Elsevier
Background: The use of static cages for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can cause
complications such as endplate violation, graft subsidence, and nerve injury. Therefore …

[HTML][HTML] Does the application of expandable cages in TLIF provide improved clinical and radiological results compared to static cages? A meta-analysis

GX Lin, JS Kim, V Kotheeranurak, CM Chen… - Frontiers in …, 2022 - frontiersin.org
Purpose: This study aimed to provide a direct meta-analysis of the evidence comparing
outcomes between expandable cages and static cages in patients with transforaminal …

[HTML][HTML] Effects of the cage height and positioning on clinical and radiographic outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study

C Wu, H Bian, J Liu, D Zhao, H Yang, C Chen… - BMC Musculoskeletal …, 2022 - Springer
Background The proper cage positioning and height in lateral lumbar interbody fusion
(LLIF). This study evaluated their effects on clinical and radiographic outcome measures in …

Long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

CC Chang, D Chou, B Pennicooke, J Rivera… - … of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2020 - thejns.org
OBJECTIVE Potential advantages of using expandable versus static cages during
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are not fully established. The authors aimed to …

[HTML][HTML] Expandable Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review

SB Lee, J Yoon, SJ Park, DS Chae - Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024 - mdpi.com
Lumbar fusion surgery for treating degenerative spinal diseases has undergone significant
advancements in recent years. In addition to posterior instrumentation, anterior interbody …

[HTML][HTML] Clinical and radiographic analysis of expandable versus static lateral lumbar interbody fusion devices with two-year follow-up

RF Frisch, IY Luna, DM Brooks, G Joshua… - Journal of Spine …, 2018 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background Utilization of static and expandable interbody spacers for minimally invasive
lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) offers favorable clinical results. However …

Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation

RR Shah, S Mohammed, A Saifuddin, BA Taylor - European spine journal, 2003 - Springer
The availability of lumbar interbody cages has fuelled renewed interest in interbody fusion.
Despite this, there is no consensus regarding the best non-invasive method for evaluation of …

Predictors of Subsidence and its Clinical Impact After Expandable Cage Insertion in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

T Subramanian, RK Merrill, P Shahi, S Pathania… - Spine, 2023 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. Retrospective review of prospectively collected multisurgeon data. Objective.
Examine the rate, clinical impact, and predictors of subsidence after expandable minimally …