ABSTRACT
Background: Placement of a syringo-subarachnoid shunt as a surgical management for syringomyelia has been well described in the literature. Good results in terms of clinical and radiological improvement have been documented especially for posttraumatic syringomyelia. Traditionally, this has been performed using open approaches which are fraught with risks of cerebrospinal fluid leak, delayed wound healing, and increased postoperative pain. With the help of minimally invasive techniques that are currently being used to treat various degenerative spinal disorders, most of these complications may be minimized. However, few reports in literature describe similar approaches for accessing intradural intramedullary spinal cord lesions and especially for syringomyelia.
Methods: Retrospective case review: using a 22-mm tubular retractor, a laminotomy was performed, durotomy done, and spinal cord identified. Myelotomy was performed at the dorsal root entry zone, syrinx visualized and entered, followed by placement of syringo-subarachnoid shunt.
Results: Three male patients aged 44, 57, and 37 underwent placement of syringo-subarachnoid shunts using minimally invasive fixed tubular retractors. Indications included posttraumatic or postsurgical spinal cord syrinx. Follow-up period was 1 year in all cases. There were no neurological or technique-related complications. All patients showed clinical improvement upon subsequent follow up.
Conclusions: Our clinical experience on the treatment of syringomyelia via a minimally invasive fixed tubular retractor is presented. We find that this is an ideal approach for placement of syringo-subarachnoid shunts, as it provides direct access to the lesion with minimal collateral damage and wound-related complications.
Level of Evidence: 4
Clinical Relevance: Relevant – in demonstrating the effectiveness of an already established procedure through a novel, minimally invasive approach which has the potential to significantly reduce the overall morbidity, in view of the inherent approach-related benefits as compared to conventional open approaches.
Footnotes
Disclosures and COI: There are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication, and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. This manuscript is original, has not been published before, and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
- ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
- This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2020 ISASS.