Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Reliability and Clinical Usefulness of Current Classifications in Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature

I. CURFS, M. SCHOTANUS, W.L.W. VAN HEMERT, M. HEIJMANS, R.A. DE BIE, L.W. VAN RHIJN and P.C.P.H. WILLEMS
International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2020, 14 (6) 956-969; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/7145
I. CURFS
1Zuyderland Medical Centre, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Heerlen, Netherlands
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. SCHOTANUS
1Zuyderland Medical Centre, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Heerlen, Netherlands
2Research School CAPHRI
MSC, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.L.W. VAN HEMERT
1Zuyderland Medical Centre, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Heerlen, Netherlands
MD, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. HEIJMANS
3Zuyderland Medical Centre, Zuyderland Academy Heerlen, Netherlands
MSC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.A. DE BIE
2Research School CAPHRI
4University of Maastricht, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht, Netherlands
PT, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.W. VAN RHIJN
2Research School CAPHRI
5Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Maastricht, Netherlands
MD, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.C.P.H. WILLEMS
2Research School CAPHRI
5Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Maastricht, Netherlands
MD, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background: A validated classification remains the key to an appropriate treatment algorithm of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Considering the development of many classifications, it is remarkable that consensus about treatment is still lacking. We conducted a systematic review to investigate which classification can be used best for treatment decision making in thoracolumbar fractures.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane using the following search terms: classification (mesh), spinal fractures (mesh), and corresponding synonyms. All hits were viewed by 2 independent researchers. Papers were included if analyzing the reliability (kappa values) and clinical usefulness (specificity or sensitivity of an algorithm) of currently most used classifications (Magerl/AO, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score [TLICS] or thoracolumbar injury severity score, and the new AO spine).

Results: Twenty articles are included. The presented kappa values indicate moderate to substantial agreement for all 3 classifications. Regarding the clinical usefulness, > 90% agreement between actual treatment and classification recommendation is reported for most fractures. However, it appears that over 50% of the patients with a stable burst fracture (TLICS 2, AO-A3/A4) in daily practice are operated, so in these cases treatment decision is not primarily based on classification.

Conclusion: AO, TLICS, and new AO spine classifications have acceptable accuracy (kappa > 0.4), but are limited in clinical usefulness since the treatment recommendation is not always implemented in clinical practice. Differences in treatment decision making arise from several causes, such as surgeon and patient preferences and prognostic factors that are not included in classifications yet. The recently validated thoracolumbar AO spine injury score seems promising for use in clinical practice, because of inclusion of patient-specific modifiers. Future research should prove its definite value in treatment decision making.

Level of Evidence: 2.

Clinical Relevance: Without the appropriate treatment, the impact of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures can be devastating. Therefore it is important to achieve consensus in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

  • thoracolumbar spine
  • fractures
  • classification
  • clinical usefulness
  • reliability
  • AO spine
  • TLICS

Footnotes

  • Disclosures and COI: The authors have no disclosures, and did not receive any funding. The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical devices or drugs.

  • This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2020 ISASS
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 14, Issue 6
1 Dec 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reliability and Clinical Usefulness of Current Classifications in Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reliability and Clinical Usefulness of Current Classifications in Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature
I. CURFS, M. SCHOTANUS, W.L.W. VAN HEMERT, M. HEIJMANS, R.A. DE BIE, L.W. VAN RHIJN, P.C.P.H. WILLEMS
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2020, 14 (6) 956-969; DOI: 10.14444/7145

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reliability and Clinical Usefulness of Current Classifications in Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature
I. CURFS, M. SCHOTANUS, W.L.W. VAN HEMERT, M. HEIJMANS, R.A. DE BIE, L.W. VAN RHIJN, P.C.P.H. WILLEMS
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2020, 14 (6) 956-969; DOI: 10.14444/7145
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Appendix
    • APPENDIX 2. SEARCH PROCESS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Segmental Lordosis and Disc Height Discrepancies in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages
  • Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
  • Association Between Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Use and Surgical Outcomes Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Medical Claims Database Analysis
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • thoracolumbar spine
  • fractures
  • classification
  • clinical usefulness
  • reliability
  • AO spine
  • TLICS

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire