Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleTumor

Safety and Neurologic Recovery of L2 Nerve Root Sacrificed in Total En Bloc Spondylectomy Involving the L2 Vertebra

Permsak Paholpak, Apiruk Sangsin, Winai Sirichativapee, Taweechok Wisanuyotin, Weerachai Kosuwon, Yuichi Kasai, Hideki Murakami and Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2021, 15 (6) 1217-1222; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8154
Permsak Paholpak
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
2 Musculoskeletal Oncology Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Apiruk Sangsin
3 Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University, Chiangmai, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Winai Sirichativapee
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
2 Musculoskeletal Oncology Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taweechok Wisanuyotin
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
2 Musculoskeletal Oncology Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weerachai Kosuwon
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
2 Musculoskeletal Oncology Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuichi Kasai
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
2 Musculoskeletal Oncology Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hideki Murakami
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya city University, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The L2 nerve root is considered part of the lumbar plexus that innervates the iliopsoas (IP) and quadricep muscles (Qd). Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) at the L2 vertebra requires bilateral nerve root transection to facilitate surgical dissection and vertebral body removal. Information regarding neurological function recovery of the IP and Qd in patients with muscle weakness before TES is lacking. We aimed to report the neurological recovery of IP and Qd after TES involving the L2 vertebra in preoperative lower extremity weakness in spinal tumor patients.

Methods We prospectively recorded all L2-involved spinal tumor patients undergoing TES between January 2018 and November 2020. As a primary outcome, we recorded the Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) grade of the IP and Qd preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Frankel neurological status, sensation impairment, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score.

Results From 8 TES-involving L2 patients, 6 (4 males) met the inclusion criteria. One patient had first-grade deterioration of the Qd MMT immediately postoperatively. All patients could ambulate independently 6 months after surgery. Five patients required follow-up for more than 1 year and could walk without any gait aids. All patients had persistent anterior groin and bilateral thigh numbness until the final follow-up.

Conclusion Neurological recovery of the IP and Qd muscles as measured by MMT can occur within 6 months of bilateral L2 nerve root transection. Bilateral L2 nerve root sacrifice can have acceptable neurological outcomes and recovery, even in patients with preoperative IP and Qd weakness.

Level of Evidence 4.

  • total en bloc spondylectomy
  • TES
  • L2 nerve root sacrifice
  • neurological function
  • neurological recovery

INTRODUCTION

Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is considered one of the surgical options for primary spinal tumors and some patients with spinal metastasis.1–6 As an aid to surgical dissection, bilateral nerve root ligation is performed at the thoracic spinal level. It is known that at the lumbar spinal level, L3 to L5 nerve root transection will result in residual deterioration of motor function of the quadriceps (Qd) and tibialis anterior, which will impair the ability to perform basic activities of daily living (ADL).7–9 What is lacking, however, is information on motor function after transection of the L1 and L2 nerve roots.

The L2 nerve root is included in the lumbar plexus and innervates the iliopsoas (IP) and Qd muscles.10,11 A study by Kato et al showed initial deterioration of IP and Qd muscle strength after bilateral transection of the L2 nerve roots, which gradually recovered.12 Kato et al, however, included only patients who had preoperative motor function of the Qd and IP of at least grade 4 (by Manual Muscle Testing [MMT]) and at least D3 (according to the Frankel neurological grade). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the neurological recovery of Qd and IP muscle function (Frankel grade A, B, and C) after performing bilateral L2 nerve root resection TES.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After securing ethics approval from our institution (registration HE611450), we prospectively recorded 38 patients who underwent TES between January 2018 and November 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) spinal tumor involving L2 vertebra, (b) bilateral L2 ligation and transection, (c) minimum follow-up time of 6 months, and (d) preoperative Frankel neurological grade of A, B, or C. The exclusion criteria were (a) no follow-up for at least 6 months and (b) preoperative Frankel neurological grade of D or E.

All TES cases were performed by the same operator (P.P.). All patients underwent an anterior-posterior approach. The anterior retroperitoneal approach on the left side was used to identify and cut the diaphragmatic crus, which were inserted at the L2 vertebral body (Figure 1). En bloc laminectomy was then performed with a posterior approach using T-saw pediculectomy (Figure 2). The bilateral L2 nerve roots were ligated and cut at the level proximal to the dorsal root ganglion. The en bloc vertebrectomy was done using a posterior approach by cutting the adjacent intervertebral disc with an L-shape osteotome (Figure 3) and then rotating the vertebral body outward carefully to avoid any thecal sac injury. A titanium mesh cage was used for anterior column reconstruction, and spinal shortening was performed to tighten the cage and increase spinal blood flow.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

The diaphragmatic crus from left side anterior retroperitoneal approach.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

En bloc laminectomy performed with a posterior approach using T-saw pediculectomy.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

L-shaped osteotome used to perform spondylectomy through posterior approach.

The primary outcome was neurologic recovery of the IP and Qd vis-à-vis motor function according to MMT grading. The secondary outcomes were Frankel neurological status, sensation impairment, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)13,14 at the last follow-up. In terms of follow-up, a clinical evaluation was done, and a plain radiograph taken monthly until month 3. Then a clinical assessment was done, and a plain radiograph and computed tomographic (CT) image were taken of the spine every 3 months until 1 year. Finally, the clinical examination and x-ray imaging were done every 6 months until year 2. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was indicated when local recurrence of the tumor was suspected by CT. In terms of neurological status and MMT testing evaluation, all patients were assessed by the operating author (P.P.).

RESULTS

Of the 38 TES cases at our institution, 8 underwent TES at the L2 level. After screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 6 patients (4 men) remained in the study. The demographic data, presenting symptoms, and duration of symptoms for these patients are presented in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Patients’ demographics and presenting symptoms.

Immediately postoperatively, 1 patient (case no. 3) had a temporary single grade bilateral reduction in the MMT of the Qd (Table 2). All patients had bilateral anterior thigh and groin paresthesia and 1 patient (case no. 4) had transient tingling in the anterior groin. All patients at the last follow-up showed recovery of the IP and Qd MMT to at least grade 4. The ECOG score was improved in all patients. Regarding ADL, all patients could perform self-care and dependent ambulation at home by the last follow-up (Table 2). Most of the patients could perform self-ambulation with gait aids, such as a walker frame, within 5 months postoperatively. Regarding ODI, the disability status was mild (score ranges from 10% to 28%) in 5 patients and moderate in 1 patient (score ranges from 30% to 48%) at the last follow-up period. All patients had persistent bilateral numbness of the anterior thigh, but this did not disturb their ADL. Five of the 6 patients were still attending follow-up more than 12 months postoperatively. One patient died (case no.1) from the disease (cholangiocarcinoma) at 7 months postoperatively. Before his death, he could perform ADL with minimal help and was satisfied with the result of his spinal surgery.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), Frankel grading, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at the last follow-up, and Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of the iliopsoas (IP) and quadriceps (Qd) at preoperative and postoperative follow-up until last follow-up.

Regarding complications, none of the patients suffered from surgery-related complications.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 56-year-old man presented with L2 metastasis from adenocarcinoma of the lung. The MRI showed L2 destruction with soft tissue extension compressing the spinal canal, leading to bilateral weakness of the lower extremities’ muscle MMT (Figure 4). TES of L2 was performed using a combined anterior-posterior approach with L2 nerve root transection (Figure 5). The TES specimen is shown in Figure 6. At the last follow-up, the patient could walk independently and showed neurological recovery to Frankel E and an ECOG score of 1.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

MRI demonstrated single L2 level spinal metastasis with severe spinal canal compression.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

L2 Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) was performed with bilateral L2 nerve root sacrificed.

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6

L2 TES specimen (TES, total en bloc spondylectomy).

DISCUSSION

TES is a surgical procedure that achieves total removal of a spinal column-containing tumor.10,11,15–17 To facilitate complete removal of the tumor and the vertebral column, bilateral nerve root transection at the affected vertebra is recommended. At the thoracic level, bilateral nerve root ligation causes dermatomal numbness and weakness of the paravertebral muscle, which does not much alter ADL.4,6,18,19 However, at the lumbar level, especially at L3 to L5, the nerve root sacrificed can cause significant deterioration in ambulation and dependence on other people for normal ADL.1,7,8,20 The L2 nerve root forms part of the lumbar plexus, which contributes to innervation of the IP and Qd muscles.10,11Sacrificing the bilateral L2 nerve root in spinal surgery raises the possibility of post-operative neurological deterioration of the IP and Qd muscles.

Kato et al12 reported a period of temporary MMT deterioration of the IP and Qd postoperatively after sacrificing the bilateral L2 nerve root during TES (ie, MMT grading at least 4, and Frankel D2 to E). All 13 patients in the study by Kato et al returned to preoperative MMT of the IP and Qd with no impairment in ADL at their last followup. In our study, an improvement in MMT grading of the IP and Qd was demonstrated over time when the preoperative IP and Qd MMT grading was less than grade 3. All the patients in our study showed almost completely independent ambulation (ECOG of 1 and 2) and no impairment in ADL at their last follow-up (Frankel D3C to E) (Table 2). Our results confirm that the L2 nerve root plays some part in the innervation of Qd and IP along with L3 and L4. Even with sacrifice of the bilateral L2 nerve root, the MMT of the IP and Qd recovered after surgery, albeit over time. All patients in our study experienced persistent bilateral numbness at the anterior thigh, but this did not significantly disturb ADL. Evidence suggests L2 nerve root transection during L2-involving TES can have satisfactory outcomes.

The limitations of our study were (a) the small number of patients and (b) the relatively short period of postoperative follow-up. Our study had several strengths: (a) only L1 and L2 transection cases were included, and (b) despite the short period of follow-up, the study demonstrated recovery of MMT of the IP and Qd.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that L2-sacrificing TES can be safely performed, and acceptable neurological results can be expected in terms of MMT recovery of the IP and Qd vis-à-vis preoperative Frankel A to C. Considering the small number of patients, further study with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients, the Department of Orthopedics and the Faculty of Medicine for their support, and Mr. Bryan Roderick Hamman under the aegis of the KKU Publication Clinic for assistance with the English language presentation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Funding This study received support grants from the Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University (IN64135) and Research and Graduate Studies, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

  • Declaration of Conflicting Interests The authors report no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

  • This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2021 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Li Z ,
    2. Lv Z ,
    3. Li J
    . Total en bloc spondylectomy for the fifth lumbar solitary metastasis by a posterior-only approach. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:235–239. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.054.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Shimizu T ,
    2. Murakami H ,
    3. Demura S , et al
    . Total en bloc spondylectomy for primary tumors of the lumbar spine. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(37):37:e12366. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000012366.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jones M ,
    2. Holton J ,
    3. Hughes S ,
    4. Czyz M
    . Total en bloc spondylectomy. J Spine Surg. 2018;4(3):663–665. doi:10.21037/jss.2018.06.12.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Domenicucci M ,
    2. Nigro L ,
    3. Delfini R
    . Total en-bloc spondylectomy through a posterior approach: technique and surgical outcome in thoracic metastases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(7):1373–1376. doi:10.1007/s00701-018-3572-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sciubba DM ,
    2. De la Garza Ramos R ,
    3. Goodwin CR , et al
    . Total en bloc spondylectomy for locally aggressive and primary malignant tumors of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(12):4080–4087. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4641-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kato S ,
    2. Murakami H ,
    3. Demura S , et al
    . More than 10-year follow-up after total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(4):1330–1336. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3333-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Dai T ,
    2. Pan T ,
    3. Zhang X ,
    4. Chen G ,
    5. Lu P ,
    6. Shi K
    . Feasibility of total en-bloc spondylectomy on L5 by a posterior-only approach: an autopsy study. J Bone Oncol. 2019;14:100204. doi:10.1016/j.jbo.2018.10.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lin B ,
    2. Chen ZW ,
    3. Wang N ,
    4. Guo ZM ,
    5. Liu H ,
    6. Zeng M
    . Total en bloc spondylectomy of L3 vertebra for histiocytic sarcoma. Orthopedics. 2012;35(4):e610–4. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120327-38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gallia GL ,
    2. Suk I ,
    3. Witham TF , et al
    . Lumbopelvic reconstruction after combined L5 spondylectomy and total sacrectomy for en bloc resection of a malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(2):E498–502. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000382972.15422.10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Khan A ,
    2. Arian A
    . Anatomy, bony pelvis and lower limb, anterior thigh muscles. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bordoni B ,
    2. Matthew V
    . Anatomy, bony pelvis and lower limb, Iliopsoas Muscle. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kato S ,
    2. Murakami H ,
    3. Demura S , et al
    . Motor and sensory impairments of the lower extremities after L2 nerve root transection during total en bloc spondylectomy. Spine. 2019;44(16):1129–1136. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003032.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Fairbank JCT
    . Oswestry disability index. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(2):239–241. doi:10.3171/2013.7.SPINE13288.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fairbank JC ,
    2. Pynsent PB
    . The oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940–2952. doi:10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kawahara N ,
    2. Tomita K ,
    3. Murakami H ,
    4. Demura S
    . Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: surgical techniques and related basic background. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2009;40(1):47–63. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2008.09.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Murakami H ,
    2. Kawahara N ,
    3. Abdel-Wanis ME ,
    4. Tomita K
    . Total en bloc spondylectomy. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2001;5(2):189–194. doi:10.1055/s-2001-15679.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tomita K ,
    2. Kawahara N ,
    3. Baba H ,
    4. Tsuchiya H ,
    5. Fujita T ,
    6. Toribatake Y
    . Total en bloc spondylectomy. A new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors. Spine. 1997;22(3):324–333. doi:10.1097/00007632-199702010-00018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kato S ,
    2. Murakami H ,
    3. Demura S , et al
    . Patient-reported outcome and quality of life after total en bloc spondylectomy for a primary spinal tumour. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(12):1693–1698. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.33832.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Murakami H ,
    2. Kawahara N ,
    3. Demura S ,
    4. Kato S ,
    5. Yoshioka K ,
    6. Tomita K
    . Neurological function after total en bloc spondylectomy for thoracic spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(3):253–256. doi:10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Yang X ,
    2. Yang J ,
    3. Jia Q , et al
    . A novel technique for total en bloc spondylectomy of the fifth lumbar tumor through posterior-only approach. Spine. 2019;44(12):896–901. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 15, Issue 6
1 Dec 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety and Neurologic Recovery of L2 Nerve Root Sacrificed in Total En Bloc Spondylectomy Involving the L2 Vertebra
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Safety and Neurologic Recovery of L2 Nerve Root Sacrificed in Total En Bloc Spondylectomy Involving the L2 Vertebra
Permsak Paholpak, Apiruk Sangsin, Winai Sirichativapee, Taweechok Wisanuyotin, Weerachai Kosuwon, Yuichi Kasai, Hideki Murakami, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2021, 15 (6) 1217-1222; DOI: 10.14444/8154

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Safety and Neurologic Recovery of L2 Nerve Root Sacrificed in Total En Bloc Spondylectomy Involving the L2 Vertebra
Permsak Paholpak, Apiruk Sangsin, Winai Sirichativapee, Taweechok Wisanuyotin, Weerachai Kosuwon, Yuichi Kasai, Hideki Murakami, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2021, 15 (6) 1217-1222; DOI: 10.14444/8154
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • CASE PRESENTATION
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Predicting Survival in Patients Presenting With Spinal Epidural Metastases: The Limburg Spinal Metastasis Score
  • Preoperative Predictors of Survival in Patients With Spinal Metastatic Disease
  • Laminectomy vs Fusion for Intradural Extramedullary Tumors
Show more Tumor

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • total en bloc spondylectomy
  • TES
  • L2 nerve root sacrifice
  • neurological function
  • neurological recovery

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire