Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
CorrectionCorrections

Corrections

International Journal of Spine Surgery September 2023, 8083cxx; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8083cxx

Radcliff K, Zigler J, Braxton E, et al. Final long-term reporting from a randomized controlled IDE trial for lumbar artificial discs in single-level degenerative disc disease: 7-year results. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(4):612-632. https://doi.org/10.14444/8083

The authors report that an error appeared in this article. On page 614, the data listed in the following sentences were incorrect: “The mean Physical Component Summary improved by 13.1 points and 11.4 points, for the activL and ProDisc-L patients, respectively (P ‼ .0001). Moreover, the mean Mental Component Summary also significantly improved compared with baseline (P ‼ .0001) (activL, 17.2 points; ProDisc-L, 18.3 points).”

The sentence should have appeared as follows: “The mean Physical Component Summary improved by 17.2 points and 18.3 points, for the activL and ProDisc-L patients, respectively (P ‼ .0001). Moreover, the mean Mental Component Summary also significantly improved compared with baseline (P ‼ .0001) (activL, 13.1 points; ProDisc-L, 11.4 points).” (doi:10.14444/8083cxx)

  • Copyright © 2023 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire