Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleCervical Spine

Reoperation Rates Following Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty

John A. Rodriguez-Feo, Daniel Leas, Susan M. Odum, Marc Angerame, Mark Kurd, Bruce V. Darden and R. Alden Milam
International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2018, 5094; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/5094
John A. Rodriguez-Feo
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Leas
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan M. Odum
2OrthoCarolina Research Institute Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Angerame
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Kurd
3Thomas Jefferson University & Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce V. Darden
4OrthoCarolina Spine Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Alden Milam
4OrthoCarolina Spine Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Laminoplasty is a safe and effective procedure for multilevel degenerative cervical stenosis causing myelopathy, that allows for motion preservation. The purpose of this study was to determine the reoperation rate and associated risk factors after cervical laminoplasty.

Methods We present a retrospective consecutive series of patients who underwent a laminoplasty procedure between January 1, 2005, and October 31, 2012, and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic data were collected and operative records were reviewed to determine the cervical levels involved in the laminoplasty procedure, any concomitant procedures, and estimated blood loss. Clinical records were reviewed and telephone interviews were conducted on those patients with less than 2-year in-person follow-up. Patients requiring reoperations and the reason for the reoperations were determined, as well as the incidence of postoperative C5 palsy.

Results A total of 222 of 266 patients (83%) with a minimum 2-year follow-up had an average follow-up of 4.97 years. Overall, 26 patients underwent 30 reoperations (13.5%). A total of 15 patients underwent 16 reoperations (7.2%) in the acute postoperative period for infection requiring at least 1 irrigation and debridement, hardware-related issues, or posterior cervical wound issues. A total of 13 patients had 14 reoperations (6.3%) outside of the acute postoperative period for the development of a new radiculopathy, recurrent myelopathy, neurologic symptoms with a kyphotic deformity, or a posttraumatic focal kyphotic deformity. Patients who had a concomitant laminectomy demonstrated a significantly (P = .03) higher reoperation rate than those who did not. There were no other statistically significant associations. The C5 palsy rate was 8.1% (18 of 222).

Conclusions Although the preserved motion following laminoplasty may allow for the development of new neurologic symptoms, the reoperation rate continues to compare favorably with laminectomy and fusion and remains a reasonable option for the surgical management of multilevel cervical stenosis causing myelopathy.

Level of Evidence 4.

  • laminoplasty
  • cervical spondylotic myelopathy
  • OPLL
  • cervical spine
  • degenerative cervical myelopathy
  • cohort study
  • anterior cervical spine
  • reoperation
  • readmission
  • complications

Footnotes

  • Disclosures and COI: The authors received no funding for this study and report no conflicts of interest.

  • ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue 3
1 Jun 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reoperation Rates Following Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reoperation Rates Following Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty
John A. Rodriguez-Feo, Daniel Leas, Susan M. Odum, Marc Angerame, Mark Kurd, Bruce V. Darden, R. Alden Milam
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2018, 5094; DOI: 10.14444/5094

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reoperation Rates Following Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty
John A. Rodriguez-Feo, Daniel Leas, Susan M. Odum, Marc Angerame, Mark Kurd, Bruce V. Darden, R. Alden Milam
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2018, 5094; DOI: 10.14444/5094
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cervical Myelopathy Secondary to Bilateral Atlantoaxial Pseudoarticulations in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report
  • Innovation and Adversity in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective
Show more Cervical Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • laminoplasty
  • cervical spondylotic myelopathy
  • OPLL
  • cervical spine
  • degenerative cervical myelopathy
  • cohort study
  • anterior cervical spine
  • reoperation
  • readmission
  • complications

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire