Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleTDR

Validation of Pre-operative Templating for Total Disc Replacement Surgery

Justin F.M. Hollenbeck, Jill A. Fattor, Vikas Patel, Evalina Burger, Paul J. Rullkoetter and Christopher M.J. Cain
International Journal of Spine Surgery February 2019, 6011; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/6011
Justin F.M. Hollenbeck
1Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado,
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jill A. Fattor
2Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado
MS, MS-PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vikas Patel
2Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado
BSME, MA, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evalina Burger
2Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado
MBCHB, MMED(ORTHO)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul J. Rullkoetter
1Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado,
PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher M.J. Cain
2Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado
MBBS, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objectives This was an analytic retrospective observational study. The aims were (1) to validate patient-specific templating process by comparing postoperative range of motion (ROM) with that predicted by the model, (2) to retrospectively determine the ideal implant size, height, configuration, and location to evaluate if the ROM achieved could have been improved, and (3) to correlate postoperative ROM and clinical outcome.

Background Previous research revealed that after total disc replacement surgery, 34% of patients with less than 5° of postoperative ROM developed adjacent segment disease. The match between patient anatomy (size, facet orientation, disc height) and implant parameters are likely to affect postoperative ROM and clinical outcomes.

Methods Seventeen consecutive patients were implanted with 22 ProDisc-L devices between 2008 and 2015. Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of the implanted segment were constructed from preoperative computed tomography scans and virtually implanted with the ProDisc-L implant. ROM was determined with the endpoints of facet impingement in flexion and implant contact in extension. FE templating was used to determine the optimal implant size and location. ROM was then measured directly from flexion and extension radiographs and compared to predicted ROM. Pre and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) data were used to correlate ROM with clinical outcomes.

Results No significant difference was found between the actual and predicted ROM. The computational templating procedure identified an optimal ROM that was significantly greater than actual ROM. The ROM in our cohort could have been improved by an average of 1.2° or 12% had a different implant size or position been used.

Conclusions FE analyses accurately predicted ROM in this cohort and can facilitate selection of the optimal implant size and location that we believe will increase the chance of achieving clinical success with the application of this technology.

  • low back pain
  • adjacent segment disease
  • total disc replacement
  • range of motion
  • Finite Element Modeling

Footnotes

  • Disclosures and COI: Part funding for this project was provided through a research grant from the Anschutz Foundation. The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest.

  • ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validation of Pre-operative Templating for Total Disc Replacement Surgery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Validation of Pre-operative Templating for Total Disc Replacement Surgery
Justin F.M. Hollenbeck, Jill A. Fattor, Vikas Patel, Evalina Burger, Paul J. Rullkoetter, Christopher M.J. Cain
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2019, 6011; DOI: 10.14444/6011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Validation of Pre-operative Templating for Total Disc Replacement Surgery
Justin F.M. Hollenbeck, Jill A. Fattor, Vikas Patel, Evalina Burger, Paul J. Rullkoetter, Christopher M.J. Cain
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2019, 6011; DOI: 10.14444/6011
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Total Joint Replacement of the Lumbar Spine: The Future of Motion Preservation
  • REPRINT: Surgical Treatment for Discogenic Low-Back Pain: Lumbar Arthroplasty Results in Superior Pain Reduction and Disability Level Improvement Compared With Lumbar Fusion
  • Long-Term Results of Charité Lumbar Disc Replacement: A 17-Year Follow-Up in a Workers’ Compensation Cohort
Show more TDR

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • low back pain
  • adjacent segment disease
  • total disc replacement
  • range of motion
  • finite element modeling

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire