Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleSpecial Issue

Load Share Mapping for Traditional PEEK vs Novel Hybrid PEEK With Expandable Porous Mesh Intervertebral Devices

Lisa A. Ferrara, Pierce D. Nunley and Marcus B. Stone
International Journal of Spine Surgery October 2020, 7134; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/7134
Lisa A. Ferrara
1OrthoKinetic Technologies, Southport, North Carolina
PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierce D. Nunley
2Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus B. Stone
2Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana
PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background A successful intervertebral fusion requires biomechanical stability created by the structural support of the interbody device and loading of the bone graft material to accelerate mechanotransduction and bone remodeling. The objective of this study was to generate a quantitative map of the contact area and stress profile for 2 implant designs; a rigid monolithic polyetheretherketone (PEEK) lateral cage (MPLC), and a unique hybrid interbody design, which includes PEEK terminal supports surrounding an expandable porous mesh (P+EPM) that serves to contain bone graft.

Methods The construct for each test consisted of a device sandwiched between 2 flat or shaped Grade 15 foam blocks. Pressure sensitive film and thin film sensors were placed between the device and each of the foam blocks. A series of each implant type was compressed at a rate 0.1 mm/second for 2 loads (1100 N and 2000 N) with and without bone graft. Device and bone graft contact area were analyzed for each test condition and corresponding load profiles were quantified and mapped.

Results P+EPM demonstrated 34% greater graft volume than MPLC resulting in a 28% larger area for bone exchange when filled. The load profiles for all applied loading paradigms for P+EPM demonstrated significant direct loading on the bone graft contained within the mesh, resulting in at least 170% greater loaded area than MPLC. Furthermore, the P+EPM demonstrated load sharing with the terminal PEEK supports. MPLC for all loading conditions demonstrated negligible bone graft loading.

Conclusions P+EPM allows for an optimized contact area for bone exchange and graft incorporation. The load profiles confirmed that the filled mesh does not stress shield terminal PEEK supports and will load share. The expandable, compliant, porous mesh provides a greater multiplanar area for bone exchange and allows for direct contact with the viscoelastic vertebral endplates, improving the endplate and graft interface mechanics.

  • Dacron mesh
  • lumbar spine fusion
  • biomechanics
  • pressure testing

Footnotes

  • Disclosures and COI: The authors are paid consultants from a company involved in the manufacture of a device examined in this study.

  • This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2020 ISASS
Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Load Share Mapping for Traditional PEEK vs Novel Hybrid PEEK With Expandable Porous Mesh Intervertebral Devices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Load Share Mapping for Traditional PEEK vs Novel Hybrid PEEK With Expandable Porous Mesh Intervertebral Devices
Lisa A. Ferrara, Pierce D. Nunley, Marcus B. Stone
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2020, 7134; DOI: 10.14444/7134

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Load Share Mapping for Traditional PEEK vs Novel Hybrid PEEK With Expandable Porous Mesh Intervertebral Devices
Lisa A. Ferrara, Pierce D. Nunley, Marcus B. Stone
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2020, 7134; DOI: 10.14444/7134
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor: Rasch Analysis and High Value Spinal Endoscopy—Another Perspective
  • Real-World Implementation of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning for Managing Surgical Spine Patients at 2 Academic Health Care Systems
  • Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Spine Surgery Across the Continuum of Care
Show more Special Issue

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Dacron mesh
  • lumbar spine fusion
  • Biomechanics
  • pressure testing

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire