Spinal navigation

You have access
A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement Techniques Using Intraoperative Conventional, Navigation, Robot-Assisted, and Augmented Reality Guiding Systems
Kanyakorn Riewruja, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Vit Kotheeranurak, Worawat Limthongkul, Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul, Stephen J. Kerr and Weerasak Singhatanadgige

International Journal of Spine Surgery October 2024, 18 (5) 551-570; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8618
You have access
Visible Light Navigation in Spine Surgery: My Experience With My First 150 Cases
Geoffrey Stewart

International Journal of Spine Surgery October 2022, 16 (S2) S28-S36; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8274
You have access
Multimodal Applications of 3D-Navigation in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Impacts on Precision, Accuracy, Complications, and Radiation Exposure
Arvind G. Kulkarni, Pritem A. Rajamani, Sandeep Tapashetti and Tushar Sathish Kunder

International Journal of Spine Surgery August 2022, 16 (4) 585-594; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8294
Open Access
The surgical learning curve and accuracy of minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement using CT based computer-assisted navigation plus continuous electromyography monitoring – a retrospective review of 627 screws in 150 patients
Martin James Wood and Jason McMillen

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2014, 8 27; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/1027
Open Access
Surgeons’ Perceptions of Spinal Navigation: Analysis of Key Factors Affecting the Lack of Adoption of Spinal Navigation Technology
Alexander D. Choo, Gilad Regev, Steven R. Garfin and Choll W. Kim

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2008, 2 (4) 189-194; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0007-RR

Main menu

User menu

Search

Spinal navigation

Content

More Information

More

Other Services