Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Indirect Decompression for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis

Peter B. Derman, Donna D. Ohnmeiss, Abbey Lauderback and Richard D. Guyer
International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2021, 15 (6) 1066-1071; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8192
Peter B. Derman
1 Texas Back Institute, Plano, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donna D. Ohnmeiss
2 Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abbey Lauderback
1 Texas Back Institute, Plano, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard D. Guyer
3 Center for Disc Replacement at Texas Back Institute, Plano, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Overview of the study population.

    Characteristics and VariablesMeanRange
    Age (years)50.119–81
      N %
    Gender
     Female30153.0%
     Male26747.0%
    Symptoms
     Radiculopathy50889.4%
     Neurogenic claudication132.3%
     Both478.3%
    Level operated
     L2-310.2%
     L3-450.9%
     L4-514325.2%
     L5-S141973.8%
    Fusion technique
     Stand-alone ALIF24743.5%
     ALIF + PI32156.5%
    • ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; PI, posterior instrumentation.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Comparison of patients for whom indirect decompression was successful vs those who underwent subsequent reoperation for direct decompression

    VariableIndirect Success
    (n = 545)
    Failed Indirect
    (n = 23)
    P Value
    Mean age (years)49.856.6<0.025
    Mean preop ODI43.846.5>0.50
    Mean preop VAS back pain6.36.4>0.50
    Mean preop VAS leg pain4.95.6>0.30
      N (%) N (%) 
    Gender>0.05
     Female288 (95.7%)13 (4.3%) 
     Male257 (96.3%)10 (3.7%) 
    Symptoms>0.05
     Radiculopathy489 (96.3%)19 (3.7%) 
     Neurogenic claudication13 (100.0%)0 (0.0%) 
     Both43 (91.4%)4 (8.5%) 
    Level operated> 0.05
     L2-31 (100.0%)0 (0.0%) 
     L3-45 (100.0%)0 (0.0%) 
     L4-5139 (97.2%)4 (2.8%) 
     L5-S1400 (95.6%)19 (4.4%) 
    ODI Section 7a >0.05
     Score 0–2377 (95.9%)16 (4.1%) 
     Score 3–5143 (95.3%)7 (4.7%) 
    Fusion technique>0.05
     Stand-alone ALIF235 (95.1%)12 (4.9%) 
     ALIF + PI310 (96.7%)11 (3.4%) 
    • aPreoperative ODI Section 7 response not available for 2 patients.

    • ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; PI, posterior instrumentation; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Preoperative and postoperative ODI and VAS scores for patients undergoing stand-alone ALIF vs ALIF With posterior instrumentation.

    Stand-Alone ALIFALIF + PI
    Outcome MeasurePreopPostopPreopPostop
    ODI44.027.343.827.5
    VAS back pain6.32.86.23.0
    VAS leg pain5.01.95.02.1
    • Note: The mean scores in both groups improved significantly on all 3 measures (all P < 0.01) with no significant differences between the 2 groups on any of the measures preoperative or postoperative (all P > 0.50).

    • ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; PI, posterior instrumentation; VAS, visual analog scale.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 15, Issue 6
1 Dec 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Indirect Decompression for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Indirect Decompression for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
Peter B. Derman, Donna D. Ohnmeiss, Abbey Lauderback, Richard D. Guyer
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2021, 15 (6) 1066-1071; DOI: 10.14444/8192

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Indirect Decompression for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
Peter B. Derman, Donna D. Ohnmeiss, Abbey Lauderback, Richard D. Guyer
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2021, 15 (6) 1066-1071; DOI: 10.14444/8192
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, 360° Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Arthroplasty for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Focus on Nerve Decompression and Painful Spinal Instability Resolution
  • Association Between Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Use and Surgical Outcomes Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Medical Claims Database Analysis
  • Postoperative Brace Prescription Practices for Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Questionnaire-Based Study of Spine Surgeons in Japan
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • indirect decompression
  • spinal stenosis
  • lumbar spine
  • anterior lumbar interbody fusion
  • clinical outcome
  • re-operation

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire