Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleBiologics

The Effect of Amniotic Tissue on Spinal Interventions: A Systematic Review

M. Lane Moore, David G. Deckey, Jordan R. Pollock, John-Rudolph H. Smith, John M. Tokish and Matthew T. Neal
International Journal of Spine Surgery February 2023, 17 (1) 32-42; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8380
M. Lane Moore
1 Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David G. Deckey
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: deckey.david@mayo.edu
Jordan R. Pollock
1 Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John-Rudolph H. Smith
3 Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Tokish
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew T. Neal
4 Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses flowchart outlining the literature review and selection process.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Summary of literature review for amniotic membrane–derived biologic agents on postoperative outcomes following spinal surgery.

    StudyDesignTissue TypeObjectiveMethodsResults
    Animal Studies
    Bolat et al33 (2013)Retrospective animal (rat) studyHAFEvaluate effects of mitomycin-C, sodium hyaluronate, and amniotic fluid on prevention of spinal epidural fibrosisA total of 4 groups (10 each): control, mitomycin-C, sodium hyaluronate, and amniotic fluid. L5 total laminectomy performed and assessed for epidural fibrosis 4-wk postoperativeSignificant difference in amount of scar tissue (none) in experimental groups compared with control group
    Choi et al34 (2011)Experimental animal (rat) studyFAMEvaluate effects of amniotic membrane on epidural adhesions after laminectomyA total of 20 rats, 2 groups. Laminectomy with or without amniotic membrane. Assessment at 1-, 3-, and 8-wk postoperativeSignificant decrease in amount and tenacity of scar tissue in amniotic membrane group
    Cunningham et al35 (2019)Experimental animal (sheep) studyDual-layer, chorion-free amnion patch from HAMEvaluate effect of dual-layer, chorion-free amnion path following lumbar laminectomyA total of 12 sheep, 2 groups: control and amnion. Laminectomy performed with or without amnion, and half were evaluated at 4 wk, half at 10 wkSignificant decrease in amount of fibroblast infiltration and tissue tenacity with the use of amnion
    Goldschlager et al36 (2011)Experimental animal (sheep) studyAECsComparison of allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells to AECs in promoting osteogenesisA total of 29 sheep divided into 5 groups: (1) C3-C4 ACDF with autograft IC and IBC, (2) HA/TCP Mastergraft granules alone, (3) HA/TCP with 5 million MPCs, (4) HA/TCP with 5 million AECs, and (5) nonoperativeMPCs lead to significantly more fusion than any other group, and all AECs failed to have any fusion at all
    Kara et al38 (2015)Experimental animal (rat) studyHAF and HAMEvaluate effectiveness of amniotic fluid and membrane on prevention of postlaminectomy spinal epidural fibrosisA total of 27 rats underwent 2 nonconsecutive lumbar laminectomies were divided into either: (1) laminectomy alone, (2) laminectomy + AM, (3) laminectomy + AF. Sacrificed at 6 wkNo significant differences between groups in regard to epidural scar formation and mean fibroblast count
    Luo et al39 (2019)Experimental animal (rabbit) studyAmniotic suspension allograft containing particulated HAM and HAFEvaluate whether amniotic suspension allograft increases intervertebral disc height and morphology after disc degenerationA total of 12 rabbits underwent disc puncture and then 4 wk later were injected with either amniotic suspension allograft, sham control, or were left untreated. Assessed over 12 wkAt 12 wk, experimental group had significantly greater disc height, magnetic resonance imaging T2 relaxation times, and improved morphology compared with control and untreated groups
    Oner et al40 (2015)Experimental animal (rat) studyHAFAssessment of 2 different bone grafts and amniotic fluid on vertebral fusion in rat modelA total of 48 rats were randomized into 1 of 4 groups: allograft group, allograft plus AF, DBM group, or DBM plus AF. Fusion of spine was assessed at 8 wkAmniotic fluid significantly enhanced posterior spinal fusion when combined with allograft
    Tao and Fan42 (2009)Experimental animal (dog) studyFAM, CAM, and AFFEvaluate whether AM can reduce epidural scar adhesion after laminectomy in canine modelA total of 24 dogs underwent laminectomy at L1, L3, L5, and L7 with FAM, CAM, AFF, and no treatment assigned randomly to each of the 4 sites. Animals were sacrificed at 1, 6, and 12 wk postoperativeCAM group had significantly lower amounts of epidural fibrosis compared with controls
    Human Studies
    Anderson et al32 (2017)Prospective, RCTCryopreserved amniotic membrane (cAM)Compare pain, functional outcomes and recurrent herniation follow lumbar microdiscectomy w/ or w/o amniotic tissue graftA total of 80 patients randomized to either amniotic tissue or no tissue following elective lumbar microdiscectomyAM group had greater functional outcomes and no recurrent herniations at 2 years
    Kamson and Smith37 (2020)Prospective, RCTCryopreserved amniotic-derived productsComparison of PROM after use of orthobiologic supplementation during endoscopic-assisted lumbar decompression surgeryA total of 269 patients randomized to receive either amniotic membrane, bone marrow aspiration, both, or none during lumbar decompressionPatients receiving either bone marrow aspirate or amniotic membrane had significantly decreased pain at all timepoints compared with control
    Subach and Copay41 (2015)Retrospective case seriesDehydrated human amnion/chorion membraneEvaluation of AM on epidural scar formation after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionA total of 5 patients who had transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with AM who subsequently underwent epidural re-explorationFour of 5 cases had easily detachable tissue during epidural re-exploration
    Walker et al43 (2018)Retrospective case seriesHAMEvaluate HAM in the prevention of spinal retethering after detetheringA total of 14 patients received HAM after detethering. Followed for minimum of 6 moOnly 1 patient required subsequent detethering
    • Abbreviations: ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; AECs, amnion-derived epithelial cells; AF, amniotic fluid; AFF, autologous-free fat; AM, amniotic membrane; CAM, cross-linked amniotic membrane; DBM, demineralized bone matrix; FAM, freeze-dried human amniotic membrane; HAF, human amniotic fluid; HA/TCP, hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate; IBC, interbody cage; IC, iliac crest autograft; MPCs, mesenchymal precursor cells; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

    • Note: Boldface indicates the primary variables being measured or outcomes of interest in each selected study.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Summary of general stem cell terminology frequently used among selected articles.

    TermDistinctions
    Amniotic membrane epithelial cellsThese are cells that can be derived from the inner lining of the placenta after birth. As such, there are fewer ethical concerns.
    Mesenchymal stem cellsThese are cells that can be derived from a variety of sources, adult, and embryo, including bone marrow, liver, kidney, muscle, adipose, connective tissue, placenta, and the umbilical cord.
    Chorion cellsThese calls can be derived from the placenta, specifically the yolk sac, which is the outermost fetal membrane surrounding the embryo.
    Umbilical cord tissueThe umbilical cord contains large amounts of mesenchymal stem cells. These cells are distinct from the stem cells found in umbilical cord blood.
    Umbilical cord bloodThe stem cells are contained in the umbilical cord blood. However, it can be difficult to obtain a unit large enough to be used in an adult.
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Summary and unique distinctions of more specific amnion terminology used throughout the selected articles. Additional summary of spine surgery uses among the selected articles.

    TermDistinctionsPotential Uses in Spine Surgery
    HAFAmniotic fluid surrounds the embryo contained in the amniotic sac and is highly proliferative. This fluid can be obtained through amniocentesis with little risk to the fetus and the mother.Bolat et al33 used to examine the effects of HAF on spinal epidural fibrosis. Kara et al38 used to examine prevention of postlaminectomy spinal epidural fibrosis. Luo et al39 used to examine impact on intervertebral disc height and morphology after disc degeneration. Oner et al40 used to determine effect on vertebral fusion. Walker et al43 used to determine prevention of spinal retethering after detethering.
    HAMThe amniotic membrane is the inner lining of the placenta. This membrane can be harvested after cesarean section.Kara et al38 used to examine prevention of postlaminectomy spinal epidural fibrosis. Luo et al39 used to examine impact on intervertebral disc height and morphology after disc degeneration
    Freeze-dried HAMFreeze drying is more abrasive than drying alone, as the process requires drying and freezing, both of which impose stress on biomaterials.Choi et al34 used this to evaluate the effects on epidural adhesions after laminectomy. Tao and Fan42 used to reduce epidural scar adhesion after laminectomy.
    Cryopreserved HAMCryopreservation includes storing the specimen in liquid nitrogen.Kamson and Smith37 used this to study PROM after endoscopic-assisted lumbar decompression. Anderson et al32 studied the use of this to compare functional outcomes and recurrent herniation after lumbar microdiscectomy.
    Dehydrated HAMAmniotic membranes undergo a process that desiccates and removes all water from the tissue. Dried samples can be stored at room temperature and typically have a much longer shelf life.Subach and Copay41 used this to evaluate epidural scar formation after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Cross-linked amniotic membraneAmniotic membrane can be cross-linked through exposure to chemicals and radiation to increase stability of the biomolecules within the membrane.Tao and Fan42 used to reduce epidural scar adhesion after laminectomy.
    Amnion-derived epithelial cellsThese are cells that can be derived from the inner lining of the placenta after birth. As such, there are fewer ethical concerns.Goldschlager et al36 used to observe effect on promoting osteogenesis.
    Dual-layered, chorion-free, amnion patchThis is derived from HAM and consists of 2 layers of amniotic membrane stacked on top of each other.Cunningham et al35 used to follow effect following lumbar laminectomy.
    • Abbreviations: HAF, human amniotic fluid; HAM, human amniotic membrane; PROM, patient-reported outcome measures.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Summary of 10 commonly utilized amnion-derived biologic agents used in orthopedics.

    Product (Company)CompositionGrowth FactorsProcessingStorageShelf LifeAvailable ConfigurationsProposed Effects and Uses
    Affinity (Organogenesis); Canton, MA, USAFresh amniotic membraneNLNLRefrigeratorNLLiquid
    • Tendon repair

    • Cartilage and osteochondral defect repair

    • Wound healing

    • Protective barrier formation

    Allogen (ViVex); Atlanta, GA, USAFrozen allograft derived from amniotic fluidTIMP-2, HGF, IL-6, TIMP-1, IL-1ra, GRO-a, TGF-B1, TGF-B2, TIMP-4NLAmbient conditions, refrigerator, or frozen2 y at −40°C for frozen configuration and 2 y at 2–30°C in liquid configuration
    • AlloGen: frozen

    • AlloGen liquid

    • Joint cushioning and preservation

    • Wound healing

    • Skin regeneration

    AlloWrap DS (Allosource); Centennial, CO, USAAmniotic membraneTGF-B1-B3, TGF-A, EGF, KGF, HGF, bFGF, IL-1, IL-2, IL-10, MMP-1–4NLAmbient conditions2 y
    • Sheet/membrane

    • Decrease scar and adhesion formation

    • Anti-inflammatory

    Amniofix (MiMedx Group Inc); Marietta, GA, USAAmniotic tissue membrane compositeEGF, KGF, HA, IL-6PURION processa Ambient conditions5 y
    • Sheet/membrane

    • Wrap

    • Particulate

    • Reduce postsurgical scar formation

    • Anti-inflammatory

    • Enhances soft tissue healing

    • Barrier for scar formation

    • Surgical, neurologic, soft tissue, and tendon applications

    Clarix Surgical Matrix (Amniox Medical Inc); Miami, FL, USACryopreserved human amniotic membraneEGF, KGF, HA, IL-6CRYOTEK processb Refrigerator or freezer3 mo at 1–10°C; 1 y at −49 to 0°C; 2 y at −85 to −50°C
    • Sheet/membrane

    • Particulate

    • Surgical covering/barrier

    • Modulates wound environment to reduce scar formation

    FloGraft (Applied Biologics); Scottsdale, AZ, USAAmnion and amniotic fluidNLNLRefrigerator or freezerNLLiquid
    • Soft tissue trauma

    • Tendinitis/tendinosis

    • Wound healing

    • Anti-inflammatory

    • Muscle, ligament, and tendon strains or partial tears

    NuCel (Organogenesis); Canton, MA, USAAmnion and amniotic fluidNLNLNLNLLiquid
    • Promotion of tissue growth and healing

    • Inhibits scar formation

    • Anti-inflammatory

    PalinGen Flow/Sports Flow (Amnio Technology); Phoenix, AZ, USAAmnion and amniotic fluid componentsFGF, EGF, PDGF A and B, VEGF, TGFβNLFreezerNLLiquid
    • Anti-inflammatory

    • Improved wound healing

    • Decreased scar formation

    ReNu (Organogenesis); Canton, MA, USACryopreserved amniotic suspension allograftNLNLFreezerNLLiquid
    • Soft tissue healing

    • Knee osteoarthritis

    • Anti-inflammatory

    ViaShield (Globus Medical); Audubon, PA, USAChorion-free, dual-layer amnion patchNLNLNLNLSheet/membraneNL
    • Abbreviations: bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; GRO, growth regulated protein alpha; HA, hyaluronic acid; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; IL, interleukin; KGF, keratinocyte growth factor; MMP, matrix matalloproteinase; NL, not listed; PDGF A and B, platelet derived growth factor alpha and beta; TGF, transforming growth factor; TIMP-2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

    • ↵a The PURION process of cleaning, dehydration, and sterilization safely and carefully separates placental tissues, cleans and reassembles layers, and subsequently dehydrates the tissue to preserve the key elements associated with healing. The amniotic membrane scaffolding is protected while blood components are removed, so an intact extracellular matrix is left behind. No chemical cross-linking or decellularization occurs during the process.

    • ↵b The CRYOTEK process uses cryopreservation (deep freezing) to maintain the innate biological and structural integrity of the natural tissue while maintaining its natural hydrated state.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 17, Issue 1
1 Feb 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effect of Amniotic Tissue on Spinal Interventions: A Systematic Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Effect of Amniotic Tissue on Spinal Interventions: A Systematic Review
M. Lane Moore, David G. Deckey, Jordan R. Pollock, John-Rudolph H. Smith, John M. Tokish, Matthew T. Neal
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2023, 17 (1) 32-42; DOI: 10.14444/8380

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Effect of Amniotic Tissue on Spinal Interventions: A Systematic Review
M. Lane Moore, David G. Deckey, Jordan R. Pollock, John-Rudolph H. Smith, John M. Tokish, Matthew T. Neal
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2023, 17 (1) 32-42; DOI: 10.14444/8380
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Stem Cells Therapy as a Treatment for Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
  • Does Bone Morphogenetic Protein Use Reduce Pseudarthrosis Rates in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgeries?
  • Demineralized Bone Matrix and Fibers in Spinal Fusion
Show more Biologics

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • amniotic membrane
  • chorionic membrane
  • umbilical cord
  • epidural injection
  • microdiscectomy
  • Intervertebral disc
  • disc herniation
  • epidural fibrosis
  • spinal dysraphism

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire