Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleEndoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery

Revisiting the Posterior Approach for Cervical Radiculopathy Utilizing Endoscopic Techniques: A Favorable Short-Term Outcome and Cost Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Campbell Liles, Hani Chanbour, Alexander T. Lyons, Emma Ye, Omar Zakieh, Robert J. Dambrino, Iyan Younus, Soren Jonzzon, Richard A. Berkman, Julian G. Lugo-Pico, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman and Raymond J. Gardocki
International Journal of Spine Surgery August 2024, 18 (4) 431-440; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8629
Campbell Liles
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
2 Vanderbilt Policy and Costs in Surgery (VPaCS) Research Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hani Chanbour
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander T. Lyons
3 Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Ye
3 Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omar Zakieh
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert J. Dambrino IV
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iyan Younus
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soren Jonzzon
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Berkman
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian G. Lugo-Pico
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amir M. Abtahi
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Byron F. Stephens
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MDMSCI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott L. Zuckerman
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: scott.zuckerman@vumc.org
Raymond J. Gardocki
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    A 44-year-old man with several months of worsening left C7 radiculopathy despite conservative management was found to have large paramedian C6–C7 disc rupture seen on parasagittal (A) and axial magnetic resonance imaging (B). The patient underwent a right-side anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with structural allograft (C and D) followed by complete resolution of his radicular symptoms 5 weeks after the operation.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    A 46-year-old man with a history of fibromyalgia and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome presented with 10 months of left C7 distribution radiculopathy with left triceps and wrist extension weakness despite conservative management. Preoperative imaging showing bony left C6–C7 foraminal stenosis due to uncovertebral joint hypertrophy on sagittal oblique and axial cervical spine computed tomography (A and B) with concomitant stenosis from a C6–C7 paracentral disc bulge on axial and sagittal oblique magnetic resonance imaging (C and D). The patient underwent full endoscopic left C6–C7 posterior foraminotomy (E) with subsequent improvement in C7 radicular pain and full motor recovery at 90 days postoperatively.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Total initial anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) vs endoscopic foraminotomy cost (mean ± 95% CI total surgical costs for each cohort).

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Sensitivity analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) vs endoscopic foraminotomy shows the potential impact of surgical costs and revision rates on overall cost differences between ACDF and endoscopic cervical foraminotomy ($0 on X-axis). No input variability brought ACDF costs below endoscopic cervical foraminotomy costs. Median surgical costs were used as base values with variation between the highest (gray) and lowest (black) studied costs in each variable. Revision rate base values was the percentage of each cohort undergoing revision surgery with variation tested at ±10 absolute percentage points. For sensitivity analysis, all surgical failures were eventually assumed to undergo ACDF revision. Modeled incremental cost after including revision rates was higher for ACDF (+$16,743 [$28,557 ACDF vs $11,814 endoscopic foraminotomy/discectomy]).

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Break-even analysis. Univariate sensitivity analysis testing endoscopic cervical foraminotomy failure rates (x axis) against the total cost of surgical care (y axis, including revisions), showed that break-even costs between initial ACDF and endoscopic foraminotomy occurred at a 64% endoscopic foraminotomy failure rate (solid gray line, x axis). Analysis assumes no ACDF failures and that every endoscopic foraminotomy failure was ultimately treated with an ACDF. Dashed gray lines show the currently observed endoscopic foraminotomy failure rate (x axis, 5.9%) and the corresponding modeled weighted-average total endoscopic foraminotomy cost including revisions with ACDF after failure ($11,814).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographics and preoperative variables.

    Demographics and Preoperative VariablesACDF (N = 38)Endoscopic Foraminotomy (N = 17) P
    Age, mean ± SD46.8 ± 9.457.6 ± 10.3 0.002
    Sex, woman, n (%)20 (52.6%)3 (17.6%)0.076
    Race, white, n (%)31 (81.6%)12 (70.6%)0.482
    BMI, mean ± SD29.7 ± 5.929.6 ± 5.40.951
    Calcification, n (%)10 (26.3%)3 (17.6%)0.517
     Diabetes2 (5.3%)1 (5.9%)>0.999
     Coronary artery disease1 (2.6%)1 (5.9%)0.527
     Hypertension15 (39.5%)11 (64.7%)0.143
     Congestive heart failure1 (2.6%)0>0.999
     COPD1 (2.6%)0>0.999
     Osteoporosis00-
    Smoker7 (18.4%)2 (11.8%) 0.043
    Insurance, n (%)0.206
     Private30 (78.9%)13 (76.5%)
     Public4 (10.5%)4 (23.5%)
     Uninsured4 (10.5%)0
    • Abbreviations: ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    • Note: Mean ± SD or 95% confidence interval tested with 2-tailed t test; n (%) differences tested with Fisher’s exact test. Boldface indicates statistically significant findings.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Perioperative and postoperative outcomes.

    OutcomesACDF (N = 38)Endoscopic Foraminotomy (N = 17) P
    Perioperative
     Duration of symptoms, mo, mean ± SD6.3 ± 5.219.1 ± 33.30.737
     Disc location, n (%)0.248
      Central2 (5.3%)1 (5.9%)
      Paramedian11 (28.9%)2 (11.8%)
      Lateral20 (52.6%)*14 (82.4%)
     Disc bulging/herniation, n (%)38 (100.0%)17 (100.0%)-
     Operative time, min, mean ± SD167.7 ± 22.0142.7 ± 27.4 <0.001
     Estimated blood loss, mL, mean ± SD32.2 ± 47.69.9 ± 11.6 <0.001
     Outpatient, n (%)016 (94.1%) <0.001
     Discharge home, n (%)38 (100.0%)17 (100%)-
     Length of stay, d, mean ± SD (range)1.1 ± 0.51–4 0.1 ± 0.2 (0–1) <0.001
    Postoperative
     Neurological/pain improvement at 6 wk, n (%)38 (100.0%)17 (100.0%)-
     Postoperative opioid use, n (%)30 (78.9%)0 <0.001
     Follow-up, mo, mean ± SD11.5 ± 10.77.1 ± 7.40.247
     Readmission, n (%)01 (5.9%)0.309
     Reoperation, n (%)1 (2.6%)1 (5.9%)0.527
     Complications, n (%)3 (7.9%)00.544
     Total initial surgical cost, mean ± 95% CI$27,782 ± $2011$10,103 ± $720 <0.001
    • Note: Mean ± SD or 95% confidence interval tested with 2-tailed t test; n (%) differences tested with Fisher’s exact test. Boldface indicates statistically significant findings.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Univariate and multivariable drivers of cost.

    Independent VariablesUnivariate Analysis (P)Multivariable Cost Analysis
    ACDFForaminotomyAllβ (±95% CI) P
    Preoperative variables     
     BMI0.2430.8010.549--
     Age 0.091 0.006 <0.001 --
     Race (white)0.505 0.072 0.211- 
     Gender0.6750.559 0.049 --
     Insurance (private)0.529 0.026 0.297--
    Operative variables     
     LOS (nights)0.604- <0.001 --
     Operative minutes0.427 0.122 <0.001 --
    Surgical procedure     
     ACDF-- <0.001 $17,723 ± $3065 <0.001
     Endoscopic (reference)---$10,103 ± $2537 <0.001
    • Abbreviations: ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; BMI, body mass index; LOS, length of stay.

    • Note: Univariate analysis performed with 2-tailed t test for binary independent variables and simple linear regression for independent continuous variables with a cutoff at alpha = 0.2. Multivariable stepwise regression including any significant univariate variables was performed with a significance cutoff at alpha < 0.05. Boldface indicates statistically significant findings.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Complication and revision characteristics.

    Outcome MeasureACDFEndoscopic
    Complications n = 3 n = 0
     Description
    • Mild dysphagia causing coughing and choking, though regular diet was still advised, lasting for 3 mo

    • Superficial infection treated with oral antibiotics

    • Postoperative pneumonia requiring oral antibiotics

    Reoperations n = 1 n = 1
     DescriptionRight C6 radiculopathy after C5–C6 ACDF—lead to removal of instrumentation at C5–C6 and redo ACDF C5–C7Right C4–C5 soft disc herniation leading to C5 radiculopathy and weakness in the deltoid/biceps (2/5–3/5)—lead to C4–C5 cervical disc arthroplasty
    • Abbreviation: ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 18, Issue 4
1 Aug 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Revisiting the Posterior Approach for Cervical Radiculopathy Utilizing Endoscopic Techniques: A Favorable Short-Term Outcome and Cost Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Revisiting the Posterior Approach for Cervical Radiculopathy Utilizing Endoscopic Techniques: A Favorable Short-Term Outcome and Cost Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Campbell Liles, Hani Chanbour, Alexander T. Lyons, Emma Ye, Omar Zakieh, Robert J. Dambrino, Iyan Younus, Soren Jonzzon, Richard A. Berkman, Julian G. Lugo-Pico, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman, Raymond J. Gardocki
International Journal of Spine Surgery Aug 2024, 18 (4) 431-440; DOI: 10.14444/8629

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Revisiting the Posterior Approach for Cervical Radiculopathy Utilizing Endoscopic Techniques: A Favorable Short-Term Outcome and Cost Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Campbell Liles, Hani Chanbour, Alexander T. Lyons, Emma Ye, Omar Zakieh, Robert J. Dambrino, Iyan Younus, Soren Jonzzon, Richard A. Berkman, Julian G. Lugo-Pico, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman, Raymond J. Gardocki
International Journal of Spine Surgery Aug 2024, 18 (4) 431-440; DOI: 10.14444/8629
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Patient Perspectives on Awake Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Surgery Outcomes
  • Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A French National Survey on Practices, Motivations, and Challenges
  • Effective Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery Technique With Better Facet Joint Preserving for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis
Show more Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ACDF
  • foraminotomy
  • minimally invasive
  • open
  • endoscopic
  • cost
  • outcomes

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire